Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

351 Port Size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #1  
TX92F150's Avatar
TX92F150
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Republic of Texas
351 Port Size

I replaced an exhaust manifold on my 1992 F-150 5.8 a couple of weeks ago and noticed that the exhaust ports (and I assume the intake ports as well) are extremely small. I always thought this engine ran out of steam really early in the RPM band, and now I know why. The ports seem freakishly small. I can't imagine ever being able to make any kind of power using these heads.

Not that I'll ever modify the truck from stock, but what do you that modify these engines use for heads? From what I can see, and head swap must be the foundation of any performance build for these engines.

If I ever run into head issues with this engine, I'll be on the hunt for something better than a direct replacement for these bricks.

Just wondering what everyone does.

Thanks,

JD
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 10:33 AM
  #2  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yes the heads are WAY too small for this motor, but the stock cam is a TQ grind and the 5.8 intake becomes restrictive pretty early too, so even with an upgraded cam the motor runs out of steam at around 4500rpm. The heads are one of the major reasons why it produces such low power numbers, but larger heads are of no use without a larger volume intake and higher capacity fuel system(injectors, pump), and then to make all that cooperate the computer needs to be upgraded and/or reprogrammed, so this isn't exactly a simple change. I have most of the parts collected to do this with my 5.8, the cam has already been upgraded, I have Dart Iron Eagle heads that flow about double what the stock E7TEs do, I have a Typhoon intake system, 24lb injectors, a mass air EFI system and a tuner. All totaled there is $3000+ in it so far not counting the basic engine and I still need a throttlebody and some other small parts to make it work, but when it's done it should make about 350hp.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
mean green 91's Avatar
mean green 91
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Wasilla Alaska
bout to port and polish mine. they are extra on the garage floor so im not out anything. we'll see if there's much improvement.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 09:59 PM
  #4  
TX92F150's Avatar
TX92F150
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Republic of Texas
Thanks for the feedback on the heads. I'm glad to hear I don't still have issues with my engine. I just spent a few weeks and a few bucks correcting all the drivability issues on my truck, so I'm happy (I guess) to hear "that's just the way they are". I just can't believe how early in the RPM's it starts to lay down. I can readily see that it would take re-vamping the entire intake and exhaust side to get flow and horsepower.

I fool with Thunderbird Super Coupes, and was amazed at how much better the heads are on their 3.8L V-6 than on my big 'ol 5.8! Those heads look like they can make decent power, and they do for the size of engine. But, I guess with a blower, they need to handle more airflow.

Conanski, it definately sounds like you're on the right track to making power with your 351. You seem to have all the right pieces in place. I'm sure it will be a "night and day" difference.

mean green 91, good luck with your porting project. You're right, I don't think it will hurt anything. At least you can add better parts to the upstream and downstream sides if needed once the heads are done.

Thanks!

JD
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 11:49 PM
  #5  
mean green 91's Avatar
mean green 91
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Wasilla Alaska
well i already have some shorty headers (not the best i know but the price, free, was right) and they make a noticeable difference just themselves. the heads would im sure make some more help but the 2.5" into 2.5" single has to just kill it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 11:24 AM
  #6  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by TX92F150
I just can't believe how early in the RPM's it starts to lay down. I can readily see that it would take re-vamping the entire intake and exhaust side to get flow and horsepower.
These motors were always heavily restricted from the factory to meet emissions and noise restrictions, but because of that there are lots of ways to get a little bit more power here and there in incremental steps, you don't necessarally have to go whole hog and replace the complete top end. Despite the size of the heads they do flow enough for about 275hp and the stock EFI system will support that without any mods. And getting to that power level which is quite a jump from stock and very noticable by the seat-o-the-pants dyno simply involves opening the valves more and removing the gases from the engine. Depending what version of this engine you're dealing with you could add 1.7 rockers or replace the cam, and all of the stock exhaust is restrictive so replacing any part of it pays dividends. The timing can also be advanced more than stock too, and high voltage ignition parts will also work better. I had my 5.8 modified to this level and it was definitely much more fun to drive, it really pushed the truck around with authority.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 03:43 PM
  #7  
mean green 91's Avatar
mean green 91
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Wasilla Alaska
275 would be perfect. i'm planning on port and polish and the 1.7 rockers. i have the ho coil, i just need the wires and cap. from what i understand you just use autolites and gap em to 55 then set the timing to about 14? from there i just need a decent exhaust and i should be good to go. id like to do maf conversion but i dont know if its even necessary with 275 hp. does the torque curve stay low with all this stuff? i like torque

i need to keep it emissions legal so the exhaust might be tricky
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE