When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What I thought was more interesting was they discussed dusting and said one of the common causes was a poor fitting air filter. We all know the factory air box is less than desirable. Looks like Ford might be kind of admitting similar info.
What I thought was more interesting was they discussed dusting and said one of the common causes was a poor fitting air filter. We all know the factory air box is less than desirable. Looks like Ford might be kind of admitting similar info.
Yeah, I just saw that myself. Did you see the note on page 62 about which rod is likely to break if hydrolocked due to water ingestion? How does the CAC system make #4 more prone than any others? And why is #5 most vulnerable on non-CAC models? I can't figure that one out ...
More importantly, why would that comment even be in there? Almost as if to train the service techs with methods to claim it was owner neglect that caused certain engine failures.
Yeah, I just saw that myself. Did you see the note on page 62 about which rod is likely to break if hydrolocked due to water ingestion? How does the CAC system make #4 more prone than any others? And why is #5 most vulnerable on non-CAC models? I can't figure that one out ...
More importantly, why would that comment even be in there? Almost as if to train the service techs with methods to claim it was owner neglect that caused certain engine failures.
I did see that part and thought it was interesting too. I wasn't as concerned as it being a way for techs to deny warranty coverage since that didn't really become too big of an issue until folks started chipping the 6.0. My only guess is it has to do with the way the spider directs air (or water) flow into the intake manifold compared to the non-cac engines.
If you stare at the spider and follow the air intake path through the intercooler, you can picture how water would flow over to the driver side bank coming out of the CAC pipe. On the older trucks, it would dump into the passenger side first since there was no momentum to carry it over to the driver side. Both cylinders they call out are near center, so I'm guessing that's the reasoning.
I did see that part and thought it was interesting too. I wasn't as concerned as it being a way for techs to deny warranty coverage since that didn't really become too big of an issue until folks started chipping the 6.0. My only guess is it has to do with the way the spider directs air (or water) flow into the intake manifold compared to the non-cac engines.
If you stare at the spider and follow the air intake path through the intercooler, you can picture how water would flow over to the driver side bank coming out of the CAC pipe. On the older trucks, it would dump into the passenger side first since there was no momentum to carry it over to the driver side. Both cylinders they call out are near center, so I'm guessing that's the reasoning.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.