Towing capabilities
99% of Peeps are Sheeples. They don't read the fine print. They take advertising as gospel. Most ad's say something like "with a properly equipped truck"
Chevy has about the only verbal disclaimer that I've ever heard. Jim Rome states on the radio ad that the Big Tow rating advertised, is for Single Cab Dual Rear Wheel ONLY.
Peeps seem to want a 6500Lb Platinum SCrew, and an 11K trailer. It seems the sales People at Ford Dealerships don't care to tell them that that combination doesn't work.
As Tim said, the 11K tow rating is for a Reg Cab
2011 Ford F-150 | View Towing Specifications | Ford.com
99% of Peeps are Sheeples. They don't read the fine print. They take advertising as gospel. Most ad's say something like "with a properly equipped truck"
Chevy has about the only verbal disclaimer that I've ever heard. Jim Rome states on the radio ad that the Big Tow rating advertised, is for Single Cab Dual Rear Wheel ONLY.
Peeps seem to want a 6500Lb Platinum SCrew, and an 11K trailer. It seems the sales People at Ford Dealerships don't care to tell them that that combination doesn't work.
As Tim said, the 11K tow rating is for a Reg Cab
http://www.ford.com/trucks/f150/specifications/payload/
You can get 11,200lbs towing in any cab/bed configuration as long as you have the right engine and gearing. Options come off of the GVWR and GCVWR. I wouldn't hesitate towing anything within capacity as long as it was properly set up with a WD hitch. Yes you get less payload with the 150 vs 2/350 but that's the trade off for decent MPG and road manners when not towing.
Also as far as I know, the yellow stick states max payload and doesn't have anything on it in regard to towing capacity.
Mike
The engine is IMO the least important thing. The 5.4 and any of the new engines will do fine to pull any rated load as a safe speed. Just look at the HP and torque to weight of the 5.4 in a 17,100lb GCVWR F150 vs an 80,000lb semi with a Cummins 600HP/2050TQ engine.
Mike
The engine is IMO the least important thing. The 5.4 and any of the new engines will do fine to pull any rated load as a safe speed. Just look at the HP and torque to weight of the 5.4 in a 17,100lb GCVWR F150 vs an 80,000lb semi with a Cummins 600HP/2050TQ engine.
Mike
It made a huge difference in the ride, stability, especially with 5ers.
They were also fun when empty. At stoplights, using the controls, making the back end rise then lower, then first the left side up and the right side down. Watching the folks behind me in the mirrors was always entertaining.
Great product, well worth the price and it was a great way to add an on board air compressorand tank.
I actually ran 'train horns' off the Ride Rite air tank, another self entertaining addition.
But I am easily amused
Last edited by BudMan5; Mar 18, 2011 at 08:34 AM. Reason: typo
I carried everything. I had my truck plated for 25,999 pounds although I never carried that much.
I did pull 40 foot Raptors that had a "ship" weight of 13,5K with a tongue weight of 2800 pounds. These were the three axle models and the Ride Rite easily corrected for the weight.
The heaviest hitch I pulled was a portable bathroom trailer that was both men and women rooms with porcelin fixtures and tile walls and floors. My dispatcher assured me it weighed less then 10,000 pounds buty when I crossed the scales in Wisconsin (I was commercial so I had to stop at weigh stations) the truck and trailer came to just over 25K. The Wisconsin State trooper gleefully ordered me around back for inspection and then weas disappointed that my truck was not only licensed for the weight but I had a Class A CDL.
The truck with the 6.0L turbo diesel moaned and groaned with that much weight but the load stayed level with the Ride Rite. Absolutely great product and worth way more than the actual cost.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Sorry for jumping in so late. Just signed up to the forum.
I have always been told that for safety never tow over 80% of your towing capacity. If you are rated at 8,000 lbs don't try to tow over 6,400 lbs. Remember you have to be able to stop not just pull!
docgj
I'm in the market for a truck, and up until this point, I was convinced that I wanted a F250 with the 6.7. I've spent the past countless months following threads in the 6.7 forum. I'm coming from an Excursion that had a 6.0 PSD. For the record, I typically tow fairly light loads as most people would consider them, which consists of a 3500lb 21ft boat "dry". I figured with trailer, 5 passengers, and plenty of gear, I'm roughly double that weight, but I've never hit a scale to verify, which I'm now very curious about. On rare occasion (few times of year), I'll tow a heavier dump trailer (probably 8-9Klbs+ loaded). I went from a gas (5.4 IIRC) Expedition to the diesel Excursion "just becuase". I was under the impression at the time that the diesel was the better option for such a big vehicle, that diesel fuel would ultimately cost less than regular (obviously not true), and would generally provide a better tow experience than the Expedition (which it did).
With the exception of the dump trailer, I know the SD w/ 6.7 is overkill, but I wouldn't consider a gasser in that vehicle. The F150 EB has recently caught my attention with the impressive torque, etc., and I'm now wondering if it's a better all around vehicle. I drove one last night and I like the ride overall. I also think the F150's are generally much better appointed on the interiors, although nothing wrong at all with the SD Lariats. The F150s just have a little more refinement and a few more bells/whistles (which I'm a sucker for).
It really comes down to general performance & "economy" (not in the literal sense) since the vehicles are similar in size with the 6.5ft bed (I know the F150 is a little shorter/narrower), but the cab and cargo room is quite comparable on a relative basis. Obviously both engines (EB & 6.7) are vastly different, geared for different applications/use cases, and the 6.7 is more costly to operate & maintain (diesel fuel is currently more expensive, requires DEF, and requires more oil etc during changes).
I've been trying to follow the MPG threads in both forums specifically to see how comparable the vehicles are. It's tough to tell what to really expect with the EB since it hasn't been out nearly as long as the 6.7, but preliminary data suggests that both engines are within a few MPGs of each other (with the edge going to the 6.7 currently).
Based on numbers alone, it would appear that the F150 w/ EB is more than adequate for my needs, and it's been a fairly significant adjustment for me to think I should consider the 150/EB over the 250/6.7. I never liked how my Expedition struggled to maintain a decent speed while towing a boat w/o constantly "screaming", so I'll be following people's towing experiences as the EBs continue to make their way out to market. If they truly perform as a "mini diesel" from a general torque/towing/MPG perspective, it might be up for serious consideration. Just curious if anyone else is going through the same thought process.
I am out of that now and just towing a Jayco 17c which has a wet weight of 3500 lbs.
I needed a truck to tow the trailer when I finally convinced my wife that towing it with a Jeep Wrangler , even with the tow package, really sucked for want of a better term.
So we bought an F150. I started to buy a 2011 and the EcoBoost but being old (and really having been burned by that POS 6.0L diesel) I chickened out and bought a 2010 with the 5.44L gas engine. The $5500 in rabates had nothing to do with my decision, of course.
What i am trying to say is towing your boat with the Eco is probably just fine but hauling a dump trailer (and it's just my opinion) is going to be kind of iffy.
I prefer buxum women, large caliber handguns and pickup trucks with way more power than I really need.
I would not attempt an 8-9K dump trailer with a 5.4L gasser which means I also wouldn't with an Eco. Getting the dump trailer going may be possible but I would really want to be able to stop it also. A heavier truck (with plenty of power) makes that easier by going and stopping.
I am sure some of the other folks will chime in with different opinions, this was just mine
That being said, as far as considering the EB, it's a leap of faith to a degree...there is a psychological aspect to going from a diesel to a V6. While the numbers on paper look good, I'm really after real world experience. It sounds like the EB would do a great job towing the boat....would hope it does so w/o "screaming" like my 2000 Expedition did (maintaining 65mph up and down I5 to/from Shasta Lake), and with relatively good MPG performance. I should also add that I plan to lift either vehicle...I'd likely run 35s on the F150 or 37s on the F250. I know this ultimately impacts performance, MPGs, etc, but these mods should have a relatively equal impact to each vehicle (with maybe a slight advantage againg going to the 6.7 just because of the added HP/torque).
I played around with some numbers this evening from a MPG perspective. I assumed 3mpg difference (on average) between the EB & 6.7 (advantage to the 6.7), and based on a current $5K cost difference between the two (post rebate) 150 Platinum w/ EB loaded vs a 250 Lariat loaded, it still takes many years to offset on a MPG basis alone, not including the higher maintenance costs for the 6.7. In some respects, it boils down to a "pay for performance" argument.








