''VIDEO'' 2011 F-150 5.0L vs Tundra 5.7L Drag Race
#31
Ya I would say you spanked the tundie lol
#32
6.2 vs ecoboost - YouTube
The 6.2 makes a little headway at first, but really the eco boost holds up pretty close.
The 6.2 makes a little headway at first, but really the eco boost holds up pretty close.
6.2 vs ecoboost - YouTube
#33
That is a very very close race to the 6.2, as was the previous....
Boosted launch or not, the 3.5 ecoboost is awesome for what it is and what it does, and certainly out performs the 5.0.
I would even go so far as to say it out performs the 6.2..... Very close performance and a ton better mileage, worth something.
Boosted launch or not, the 3.5 ecoboost is awesome for what it is and what it does, and certainly out performs the 5.0.
I would even go so far as to say it out performs the 6.2..... Very close performance and a ton better mileage, worth something.
#35
2011 ecoboost vs 2012 5.0 F150 race 1/4 pt 2 - YouTube
And here...
2011 ecoboost vs 2012 5.0 F150 race 1/4 pt4 - YouTube
In the first video the Ecoboost wasn't spooled properly, however it was spooled properly in the second one. Both trucks are crew cabs and the 5.0L has 3.55 gears to the Ecoboosts 3.73's. If anything comparing these video clips to the 6.2L vs Ecoboost clips, I would say that at the very least the 5.0L performs just as strongly as the Ecoboost and 6.2L, sure the Ecoboost might tow a little better because of its Turbo's and the 6.2L might tow a little better because of its sheer displacement, but I'm talking about regular unloaded and/or lightly loaded driving.
Also here's another clip of a 5.0L racing a Hemi Ram and a 5.3L Chevrolet Silverado. According to the description the 5.0L has a K&N drop in air filter and duel exhaust, The Hemi has a K&N CAI and duel exhaust, and the 5.3L Chevy is factory stock. It should also be noted that the Hemi Dodge in this clip is a 2012 model with the 6-Speed auto.
2011 F-150 vs 2012 Ram vs 2012 Silverado - YouTube
And here's a clip of a lightly modded F-150 5.0L racing a stock (I beleive) 5.7L Tundra.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y83Fq4BI4iM
#39
#42
Useless in the sence that these trucks aren't designed for drag racing outta the box? I agree 100%.
But what these videos do provide is a good visual representation of how one truck stacks up to another. At the very least the provide some entertainment value. The 5.0L vs Ecoboost clip is a good one for comparison though, The trucks are for the most part equally equipped and each clip shows a race with an improperly spooled turbo and a properly spooled turbo, vs the N/A 5.0L.
But what these videos do provide is a good visual representation of how one truck stacks up to another. At the very least the provide some entertainment value. The 5.0L vs Ecoboost clip is a good one for comparison though, The trucks are for the most part equally equipped and each clip shows a race with an improperly spooled turbo and a properly spooled turbo, vs the N/A 5.0L.
#43
One person in this thread remarked on how much heavier an F-150 is over the Tundra. I've often wondered this as I have parked my F-150 next to a bone stock '07+ Tundra and was amazed how small the Tundra makes my F-150 look. It's almost like parking an F-150 net to a Ranger or Dakota Lol.
I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
#44
One person in this thread remarked on how much heavier an F-150 is over the Tundra. I've often wondered this as I have parked my F-150 next to a bone stock '07+ Tundra and was amazed how small the Tundra makes my F-150 look. It's almost like parking an F-150 net to a Ranger or Dakota Lol.
I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
#45
One person in this thread remarked on how much heavier an F-150 is over the Tundra. I've often wondered this as I have parked my F-150 next to a bone stock '07+ Tundra and was amazed how small the Tundra makes my F-150 look. It's almost like parking an F-150 net to a Ranger or Dakota Lol.
I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
Got the spec's right here.
(Tundra Crewmax 2X4)
Overall height - 75.6
Overall width - 79.9
Overall length - 228.7
Wheelbase - 145.7
Curbweight = 5243lbs
(F-150 Supercrew 2X4)
Overall height - 76.7
Overall width - 79.2
Overall length - 231.9
Wheelbase - 144.5
Curbweight = 5345lbs
Pulled these off both manufactures websites. Of course its all circumstantial, but the point is that both trucks are practically equal in both size and weight when configured the same. I do agree that the Tundra's bloated looking body probably contributes to the illusion that its a bigger vehicle when its actually not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
640 CI Aluminum FORD
2009 - 2014 F150
68
04-17-2013 09:08 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD
Ford vs The Competition
32
01-11-2012 10:20 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD
2009 - 2014 F150
40
08-19-2011 06:48 AM