Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

''VIDEO'' 2011 F-150 5.0L vs Tundra 5.7L Drag Race

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 07-17-2012, 03:54 PM
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke
2ndStroke is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,545
Received 42 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Rompeculo5.0
Well I have a 2012 f150 fx2 5.0 screw with 3.31 gears and I just got home today from the track and I raced a 2012 tundra 5.7 and raped him by like a truck or two. Both bone stock. Let me see if I can upload the video. Sorry I'm new to this
Ya I would say you spanked the tundie lol
 
  #32  
Old 07-17-2012, 07:23 PM
NASSTY's Avatar
NASSTY
NASSTY is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ME
Posts: 2,474
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by tseekins
Unless you sit there and spool the turbos while waiting for the green light, I think the 3.5L may be a little slower on launch than the 5.0L / 5.7L.
If they aren't boost launching in a drag race they're doing it wrong.
Originally Posted by parkland
6.2 vs ecoboost - YouTube


The 6.2 makes a little headway at first, but really the eco boost holds up pretty close.
That's because they were doing it wrong. This is what happens when you boost launch.
6.2 vs ecoboost - YouTube
 
  #33  
Old 07-17-2012, 10:48 PM
parkland's Avatar
parkland
parkland is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
That is a very very close race to the 6.2, as was the previous....

Boosted launch or not, the 3.5 ecoboost is awesome for what it is and what it does, and certainly out performs the 5.0.

I would even go so far as to say it out performs the 6.2..... Very close performance and a ton better mileage, worth something.
 
  #34  
Old 07-19-2012, 10:23 AM
muddripper's Avatar
muddripper
muddripper is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my ecoboost beats my cousins 5.0 bad and he has a superchips programer and dual exhaust and mine is stock. i also raced a reg cab 5.7 tundra and beat it.
 
  #35  
Old 07-19-2012, 04:26 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by muddripper
my ecoboost beats my cousins 5.0 bad and he has a superchips programer and dual exhaust and mine is stock. i also raced a reg cab 5.7 tundra and beat it.
The 5.0L and Ecoboost are actually pretty close as seen here...

2011 ecoboost vs 2012 5.0 F150 race 1/4 pt 2 - YouTube

And here...

2011 ecoboost vs 2012 5.0 F150 race 1/4 pt4 - YouTube

In the first video the Ecoboost wasn't spooled properly, however it was spooled properly in the second one. Both trucks are crew cabs and the 5.0L has 3.55 gears to the Ecoboosts 3.73's. If anything comparing these video clips to the 6.2L vs Ecoboost clips, I would say that at the very least the 5.0L performs just as strongly as the Ecoboost and 6.2L, sure the Ecoboost might tow a little better because of its Turbo's and the 6.2L might tow a little better because of its sheer displacement, but I'm talking about regular unloaded and/or lightly loaded driving.

Also here's another clip of a 5.0L racing a Hemi Ram and a 5.3L Chevrolet Silverado. According to the description the 5.0L has a K&N drop in air filter and duel exhaust, The Hemi has a K&N CAI and duel exhaust, and the 5.3L Chevy is factory stock. It should also be noted that the Hemi Dodge in this clip is a 2012 model with the 6-Speed auto.

2011 F-150 vs 2012 Ram vs 2012 Silverado - YouTube

And here's a clip of a lightly modded F-150 5.0L racing a stock (I beleive) 5.7L Tundra.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y83Fq4BI4iM
 
  #36  
Old 07-19-2012, 04:55 PM
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke
2ndStroke is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,545
Received 42 Likes on 23 Posts
lol that chevy should stay home next time
 
  #37  
Old 07-20-2012, 11:50 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 2ndStroke
lol that chevy should stay home next time
Yeah, its kinda like picking on your little brother.
 
  #38  
Old 07-20-2012, 07:01 PM
King Ranch's Avatar
King Ranch
King Ranch is offline
Laughing Gas

Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sorry but these videos are useless
 
  #39  
Old 07-21-2012, 01:19 AM
stephen.osborne1's Avatar
stephen.osborne1
stephen.osborne1 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Idaho
Posts: 2,350
Received 178 Likes on 126 Posts
That Chev 5.3 is a gutless turd. Not even in the same ball park as the competition. I'm happy with any of the new Ford motors, though I'd hate to pay the gas bill for the 6.2.
 
  #40  
Old 07-21-2012, 01:01 PM
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke
2ndStroke is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,545
Received 42 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by stephen.osborne1
That Chev 5.3 is a gutless turd.
I'm kinda surprised, 5.3 is a decent size! I don't know much about chev, I think I will keep it that way
 
  #41  
Old 07-21-2012, 01:35 PM
parkland's Avatar
parkland
parkland is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The 4.8 chev motor is tougher that some people realise.

Theres an article somewhere and they got 1000 HP out of it with turbochargers and the engine was basically stock.
 
  #42  
Old 07-24-2012, 02:56 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by King Ranch
I'm sorry but these videos are useless
Useless in the sence that these trucks aren't designed for drag racing outta the box? I agree 100%.

But what these videos do provide is a good visual representation of how one truck stacks up to another. At the very least the provide some entertainment value. The 5.0L vs Ecoboost clip is a good one for comparison though, The trucks are for the most part equally equipped and each clip shows a race with an improperly spooled turbo and a properly spooled turbo, vs the N/A 5.0L.
 
  #43  
Old 07-24-2012, 03:04 PM
Pool Runner's Avatar
Pool Runner
Pool Runner is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
One person in this thread remarked on how much heavier an F-150 is over the Tundra. I've often wondered this as I have parked my F-150 next to a bone stock '07+ Tundra and was amazed how small the Tundra makes my F-150 look. It's almost like parking an F-150 net to a Ranger or Dakota Lol.

I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
 
  #44  
Old 07-24-2012, 03:14 PM
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke
2ndStroke is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,545
Received 42 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Pool Runner
One person in this thread remarked on how much heavier an F-150 is over the Tundra. I've often wondered this as I have parked my F-150 next to a bone stock '07+ Tundra and was amazed how small the Tundra makes my F-150 look. It's almost like parking an F-150 net to a Ranger or Dakota Lol.

I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
Maybe it is an illusion caused by the tundie's over-bloated body lines
 
  #45  
Old 07-24-2012, 03:37 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Pool Runner
One person in this thread remarked on how much heavier an F-150 is over the Tundra. I've often wondered this as I have parked my F-150 next to a bone stock '07+ Tundra and was amazed how small the Tundra makes my F-150 look. It's almost like parking an F-150 net to a Ranger or Dakota Lol.

I agree about the weight though, as I've driven a newer Tundra, it's "feels" lighter than it looks like it should.
Its simply an illusion as stated above.

Got the spec's right here.

(Tundra Crewmax 2X4)
Overall height - 75.6
Overall width - 79.9
Overall length - 228.7
Wheelbase - 145.7

Curbweight = 5243lbs

(F-150 Supercrew 2X4)
Overall height - 76.7
Overall width - 79.2
Overall length - 231.9
Wheelbase - 144.5

Curbweight = 5345lbs

Pulled these off both manufactures websites. Of course its all circumstantial, but the point is that both trucks are practically equal in both size and weight when configured the same. I do agree that the Tundra's bloated looking body probably contributes to the illusion that its a bigger vehicle when its actually not.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
640 CI Aluminum FORD
2009 - 2014 F150
68
04-17-2013 09:08 PM
MKEBoost
Ford vs The Competition
11
04-28-2012 03:01 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD
Ford vs The Competition
32
01-11-2012 10:20 PM
tseekins
5.0L Coyote
11
12-15-2011 05:17 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD
2009 - 2014 F150
40
08-19-2011 06:48 AM



Quick Reply: ''VIDEO'' 2011 F-150 5.0L vs Tundra 5.7L Drag Race



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.