Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

Fuel Tank Sending Units

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 08-22-2013, 10:30 AM
OldOneTwo's Avatar
OldOneTwo
OldOneTwo is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Near Gulf Shores AL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Thanks for the tip. I'll keep that in mind when I get a chance work on it.
 
  #32  
Old 08-22-2013, 08:04 PM
Chevy_Eater's Avatar
Chevy_Eater
Chevy_Eater is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,220
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
I wish I tried pulling the bed years ago. I've always dropped the tank too, until I had a reason to pull the bed on the S15 (reason below). It was so easy I decided to try it on the F250. It was far, far easier to pull the bed then to drop the tanks. No draining fluids, overhead lifting, hooking up fuel lines and wires over the tank while holding the tank up, just easy access to everything and much cleaner.

As far as dirt and rust, I've eaten more dirt dropping a tank than pulling a bed. Rust shouldn't be an issue, just cut the 6 bed bolts off and reinstall with new ones with anti-seize for the next time.

I can see the frame rail hitches being a deterrent though.

I had dropped the tank on my S15 to replace the fuel pump. Ended up needing a new tank and sending unit as well. Got all new stuff, installed it, a sort while later I had issues with the truck starving for fuel. Went through the usual fuel filter, fuel pump relay, etc.
Finally figured it had to be in the back, either the new pump was failing already or, just possibly the fuel lines kinked when I mounted up the new tank.

Because of the latter possibility I decided for the first time to pull the bed to get access to the fuel tank. I wanted to know for sure the condition/position of the fuel lines without disturbing them. Sure enough that was the problem. Rather then return to their normal curve ALL the fuel lines were kinked.

So removing the bed not only turned out to be the easier option, but it gives me access to inspect that everything is going together correctly without guessing and letting me down later on.

Back to the Ford, I did read after the fact about that front tank sending unit being accesible without removing bed or tank and I've since inspected it and can see that's accurate. There's quite a bit of access to the right side of the tank and the sending unit is mounted on an angle/slant and not flush on the top like the rear. Shouldn't be hard to pull it.
 
  #33  
Old 08-22-2013, 09:26 PM
OldOneTwo's Avatar
OldOneTwo
OldOneTwo is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Near Gulf Shores AL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think pulling a bed on a S15 might be a little easier than the 8 foot dually bed on my F350. A lot heavier and to protect the fiberglass fenders, they would have to be removed as well as my 5th wheel hitch mounting. That would take a lot longer than the hour and half to remove or install the tank. My experience with fuel lines on my truck, is there was a set to them where kinking would be very hard to do.
With only 66K miles (I bought it new in1996) there sure was a lot of junk in the tank. My fuel filter was black with the crap.
 
  #34  
Old 08-22-2013, 09:52 PM
Chevy_Eater's Avatar
Chevy_Eater
Chevy_Eater is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,220
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Well, like I said I did the 8ft bed on my F250 later, pics on first page of this thread, but I also did agree that the frame rail hitch would probably be a game changer for me too. My '84 had a goose-neck hitch with a large plate in the bed. Looked like it had been in there since new. If I still had that truck (I wish ) I wouldn't pull that bed either.
 
  #35  
Old 08-22-2013, 10:33 PM
Bonanza35's Avatar
Bonanza35
Bonanza35 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norco,CA
Posts: 9,331
Received 140 Likes on 100 Posts
Isn't there somebody that can rebuild the sending units in the tank. Either of mine work at all. One tank goes to 1/2 full when full, and the other to 1/4 full when full. I just write down mileage to estimate before refueling.
 
  #36  
Old 08-23-2013, 07:47 AM
Chevy_Eater's Avatar
Chevy_Eater
Chevy_Eater is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,220
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Yes, this guy for one:

Fuel Senders

I haven't tried him yet, but I'm going to contact him about my front one when I get ready to pull the bed to do the rear so I can get both done at the same time.
 
  #37  
Old 08-23-2013, 12:51 PM
Bonanza35's Avatar
Bonanza35
Bonanza35 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norco,CA
Posts: 9,331
Received 140 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Chevy_Eater
Yes, this guy for one:

Fuel Senders

I haven't tried him yet, but I'm going to contact him about my front one when I get ready to pull the bed to do the rear so I can get both done at the same time.
Thank you Chet.
 
  #38  
Old 08-23-2013, 05:58 PM
OldOneTwo's Avatar
OldOneTwo
OldOneTwo is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Near Gulf Shores AL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chevy_Eater
Well, like I said I did the 8ft bed on my F250 later, pics on first page of this thread, but I also did agree that the frame rail hitch would probably be a game changer for me too. My '84 had a goose-neck hitch with a large plate in the bed. Looked like it had been in there since new. If I still had that truck (I wish ) I wouldn't pull that bed either.

Didn't mean to ignore what you said and I apologize. I know what you mean about wishing you had your older truck. I do too. Mine was a 1965 F100 with a 352 V8. I had done a lot of mods to it, but circumstances dictated getting rid off it.

Again, I apologize for not regarding your opinion about pulling the bed.
 
  #39  
Old 08-23-2013, 07:33 PM
Chevy_Eater's Avatar
Chevy_Eater
Chevy_Eater is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,220
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
That's okay, I was rather long-winded up there anyways, I probably wouldn't have read it either.
 
  #40  
Old 08-23-2013, 11:33 PM
OldOneTwo's Avatar
OldOneTwo
OldOneTwo is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Near Gulf Shores AL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Cool!! I appreciate your input whether I use it or not. Never know when a piece of info will benefit you or not.

Take care.
 
  #41  
Old 08-24-2013, 05:12 PM
jlwoods99's Avatar
jlwoods99
jlwoods99 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went to the junk yard and found one same shape as mine and it was stainless steel but had a 4 prong wire harness. I got the plug it only used 2 wires like mine and spliced it in and its worked perfect. Wish I could tell you the year but it was in the back of a truck loose.
jim
 
  #42  
Old 08-25-2013, 11:22 PM
FordOwnerJoey's Avatar
FordOwnerJoey
FordOwnerJoey is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chevy_Eater
Here's a little follow-up on this (still haven't fixed my gauges).

Here's the Cone of Failure that came off the one P/U tube:





Here's the 'fix' so I can get to that last 1/4 tank of fuel in each tank:

Im going to switch both of my sending units over to this way. I have the same problem when it reaches about 1/4 tank it starts acting up and surging and what not. But that cone thing has a little filter in it, would like a universal filter be ok to clamp on the end of the hose? as long as its rated for diesel ofcourse... I just dont want to be sucking up any loose debris in my tanks. or did you take the cone and mount it to the end of the hose?
 
  #43  
Old 08-26-2013, 07:38 AM
OldOneTwo's Avatar
OldOneTwo
OldOneTwo is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Near Gulf Shores AL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That round orifice on the side of the pickup cone has a diaphragm in that will allow fuel to be sucked in that way if the screen on the bottom ever becomes clogged. The cone is roughly the same length as that rubber hose you see as a fix.
 
  #44  
Old 08-26-2013, 10:51 AM
mf7lakes's Avatar
mf7lakes
mf7lakes is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 52
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
heard nothing but good things about these guys:

Services

they say from $75 to $150 is typical.................
 
  #45  
Old 03-13-2014, 06:09 PM
Chevy_Eater's Avatar
Chevy_Eater
Chevy_Eater is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,220
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Some extra info to add to this. The Cone of Failure is 3.5" in length. That includes the top part that the sending unit tube fits into, approx 1".




 


Quick Reply: Fuel Tank Sending Units



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.