Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Was this combo an option?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 08:58 PM
  #16  
94MustangGT's Avatar
94MustangGT
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: NC
Allow me to think out loud for a minute... What do you drive now? And will you be keeping the '89?

If it's going to be used as a daily driver that tows 3500 lbs or less every now and then, have you considered a Ranger? It would be easy to find a SC Ranger with a 5 speed and 4WD. Unless you need it to haul people, the Ranger should work. Either the 3.0 or 4.0 would do well.

If you need a fullsize, have you considered a '97+ truck? You will have an easier time finding a SC with a 5 speed with 2 or 4WD. The 4.2 or the 4.6 are both great motors and would return decent mileage.(Edit- I see you already have a '99...)

Also I would not be afraid to get a 5.0/Auto truck either. I always wanted a 5.0/5speed truck, but the SCab may be harder to find in that combo, but man would it be sweet!
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 09:09 PM
  #17  
rikard's Avatar
rikard
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: North Reading Mass
I liked my 302s if they have the proper gearing. Its not as reliable as a 300 but I don't think any gas engine is. There are many more bolt on options for the 302 and it responds well to any improvement on the exhaust side. My 83 was slightly modded and lasted until 220k. i love my 300 but would have no problem with getting another 302. I would look for a MAF and roller cam.
regards
rikard
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #18  
JeffNJF150's Avatar
JeffNJF150
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
I wanted a 94-96 extended cab short bed 4x4 6cyl 5 spd. I looked for a while and found I was not going to find everything I wanted. I did see one truck with everything but 4x4. I ended up finding what I wanted, but with a 302 auto, and a 93. It has plenty of power for me, I do miss shifting the gears(Ive always had sticks in all my vehicles, and now I have 2 autos and only 1 stick!) but it has its plus' too. Gas mileage sucks, but if you look on fuel economy.gov, even when new the I6 only had a couple MPG on the 302, and it still sucked.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 10:30 PM
  #19  
Kapusta's Avatar
Kapusta
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 2,007
From: SW Washington
If the recent freeze didn't kill my 302, it should still have a lot of life left in it even with nearly 216K on it. It has 3.55's and even with the noisy M5R2 it has it gets around really good.
I had no problems with passing and it's even better when dropping a gear or two.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #20  
91chevywt's Avatar
91chevywt
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
I wouldn't shy away from the 302. It's really a good engine. The 300 is a better "truck" engine but the 302 really isn't far off..it's not a turd by comparison. I looked at a 302/5speed/extended cab/4x4 not too long ago. It drove pretty nicely and had good around-town power. As far as fuel mileage there won't be much difference between the 300. They can last a long time too. 200k miles wouldn't be uncommon.

Since the 302 is so popular, you can get them really easily, if you ever needed an engine. Parts are super cheap also. I think you're more likely to find the 302 in an extended cab truck with 4x4. Also for me, I wouldnt get anything but a manual transmission in these ford trucks..especially behind the 300. Even if it is the mazda trans. The 4 speed autos in these trucks just don't feel right to me.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 04:53 AM
  #21  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
The 302 is a good motor, but lacks low end torque. Thats why the 4.9 is actually a better motor for a truck that hauls stuff. My truck has a 302 and it does just fine, but could use more low end power.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 06:39 AM
  #22  
Newcomer's Avatar
Newcomer
Elder User
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: NC
My little 302 does not do well at all, but its no mystery as to why it struggles so much.............. Engine swap on the horizon...
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 07:25 AM
  #23  
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
From: town of less than 200 ppl
Originally Posted by 94MustangGT
Allow me to think out loud for a minute... What do you drive now? And will you be keeping the '89?

If it's going to be used as a daily driver that tows 3500 lbs or less every now and then, have you considered a Ranger? It would be easy to find a SC Ranger with a 5 speed and 4WD. Unless you need it to haul people, the Ranger should work. Either the 3.0 or 4.0 would do well.

If you need a fullsize, have you considered a '97+ truck? You will have an easier time finding a SC with a 5 speed with 2 or 4WD. The 4.2 or the 4.6 are both great motors and would return decent mileage.(Edit- I see you already have a '99...)

Also I would not be afraid to get a 5.0/Auto truck either. I always wanted a 5.0/5speed truck, but the SCab may be harder to find in that combo, but man would it be sweet!
Right now I have the 99 with a 4.2l and auto trans for my DD, but it is my baby and I hate driving it on the crappy roads I have to drive every day. I will be keeping the 89, becuase right now it is the only 4x4 we have. My only concern is that the tranny is starting to slip in first gear, that is why I am more interested in a 4x4. I was wanting the 92-96 model years becuase they are a little newer, and I know they are reliable pickups. As for the ranger statement.. no I have not and will not consider one. I am 6'1" tall and 250lbs. Plus whenever we decide to do anything my buddies always like to pile in my pickup, another reason I want the ext. cab so bad. I am wanting a pre-97 truck becuase I like the body style, and they are less expensive, plus I think that they are more reliable.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 07:27 AM
  #24  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
Isn't the 99 with the 4.2 a real dog? My friend has a 2001 with the 4.2 and I have no idea why anyone would want that motor in an F150. Personally, I would replace that truck with a 92-96.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 07:39 AM
  #25  
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
From: town of less than 200 ppl
Originally Posted by TexasGuy001
Isn't the 99 with the 4.2 a real dog? My friend has a 2001 with the 4.2 and I have no idea why anyone would want that motor in an F150. Personally, I would replace that truck with a 92-96.
Not at all. I don't see why everyone thinks the 4.2 is such a bad engine. I love mine. I outran my friends duramax with it on the highway. I know there were problems with the earlier ones, but that is why I bought a 99. I don't have any complaints on the truck or the engine. Mine has given me 18k trouble free miles in the year I have owned it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #26  
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
From: town of less than 200 ppl
So I finally found exactly what I want, f150 supercab with a 4.9l and a 4x4 manual trans. Only problem is that it is 3 hours away from me and just out of reach on my price range It has 189k miles, but from the pictures the body looks like it is in great shape! So now I gotta see if I can afford a loan or if a bank will even give me one (I am a senior in highschool, so maybe with a co-signer?) And I still gotta drive 3 hours to get it, just to turn around and drive right back.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 08:45 AM
  #27  
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
From: town of less than 200 ppl
Thanks for all the input guys! The information was very helpful as usual! If there is anything I can help any of you out with let me know.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 08:53 AM
  #28  
thndrroad70's Avatar
thndrroad70
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Easter Island
Originally Posted by big-ugly
I personally don't like the 302 in pickups. My dad has one in his f150 and we have had the oil pan off of it twice since we've owned it.. I hear nothing but great things about the 300's reliability. For what I am wanting the truck for, I think the 300 six suits me perfectly, and I won't have to worry about buying a truck with 200k + miles. But who knows.. maybe this would be a good oportunity for me to get a new opinion on them. I know windsor's are known for reliability, that is one of the reasons I bought my 1989 f150 with the 351w. But with the experience I have had with the 302 I am not impressed with it at all.

I must say you are Obviously a person who has done their homework and knows what reliability is all about.. that is the Perfect combo in a truck...
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #29  
jrwhitmire's Avatar
jrwhitmire
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Just make sure you don't "fall in love" with this truck just because you've had such a hard time finding it. Look it over good before buying it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 09:18 AM
  #30  
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
From: town of less than 200 ppl
Well I like to think I have done my homework anyways. And as for falling in love, I think I may have already haha. I'm not scared of the amount of miles on it at all, from what I understand these motors are known to get well into 200k +. And I am not so worried about the rest of the truck either, it looks like the previous owner/s have taken great care of it. I know it was used for pulling trailers, but that is exactly what these trucks were built to do, so I am not concerned about that either.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 10:59:05


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE