goodbye spartan

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 5, 2010 | 10:24 AM

#31

MD05

Senior User

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 144

Likes: 0

Off idle, rapid rise to peak flat to 1500/1800 rpm.

Nov 5, 2010 | 03:29 PM

#32

RUFFSTUFF

Senior User

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 257

Likes: 0

From: Kingsland, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD05

Off idle, rapid rise to peak flat to 1500/1800 rpm.

Then your last 2 posts in this thread contradict each other.

Nov 5, 2010 | 04:10 PM

#33

Machinator

Senior User

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 111

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by fg250

did you have dpf/doc delete? and how much do you want for the spartan?

I know what dpf stands for but what is doc?
Scott

Nov 5, 2010 | 07:06 PM

#34

2010F350

Senior User

Joined: Jul 2010

Posts: 208

Likes: 0

doc is the cat....

Nov 6, 2010 | 04:04 PM

#35

MD05

Senior User

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 144

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by RUFFSTUFF

Then your last 2 posts in this thread contradict each other.

No at all. One is about make the 6.4 run efficently, the other is an answer to your question..... They do not relate to each other......

Nov 6, 2010 | 05:37 PM

#36

RUFFSTUFF

Senior User

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 257

Likes: 0

From: Kingsland, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD05

No at all. One is about make the 6.4 run efficently, the other is an answer to your question..... They do not relate to each other......

Oh sorry... I thought you said "...our trucks (Navistar engines) do not produce low end torque..." and then said low end torque was "Off idle, rapid rise to peak flat to 1500/1800 rpm."

Must be the gap between idle and turbo output.

My Bad.

Nov 7, 2010 | 04:16 PM

#37

MD05

Senior User

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 144

Likes: 0

No worries, I have too many years with Big Cummins and Cat Motors, bu tthey do fit real well in our size (Super Duty) rigs.

Nov 8, 2010 | 05:13 AM

#38

Neil64

Senior User

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 424

Likes: 0

MPG

On various other forums, people running the KEM 345 tune are reporting phenomenal MPG - 24 highway, empty, hand calculated. The way I understand it, the tune does not make large boost numbers below 2000 rpms at light throttle.

Spartan is working on a 300 tune that may offer some better MPG from what I've heard.

FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Michael S. Palmer

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Verdad Gallardo

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Joe Kucinski

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Brett Foote

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Joe Kucinski

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

Brett Foote

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Michael S. Palmer

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Verdad Gallardo

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Joe Kucinski

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Brett Foote

Nov 8, 2010 | 12:31 PM

#39

StanleyZ

Logistics Pro

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 3,787

Likes: 102

From: Georgia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil64

surely thats not a 345 HP tune, right?

Nov 8, 2010 | 02:48 PM

#40

Neil64

Senior User

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 424

Likes: 0

MPG

There is a lot of info on KEMs 345 on Powerstrokenation. com. The below is just one of them and the page you'll go to has an owner stating why that tune is capable of such good MPG. Again, I have no first hand experience with any of these tunes, just found the info very interesting.

KEM 345 tune - Page 38 - Powerstroke Nation