What is it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-27-2017, 02:43 PM
MarkV's Avatar
MarkV
MarkV is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is it?

Hello,

I am beginning to look for my first big truck project and have my heart set on finding a 1940-1947 Ford truck. I am discovering that many folks don't know what type of truck it is that they have parked out in their field. How can you tell a 1.5 ton, 2 ton, and 3 ton truck apart? Is it just a matter of counting leaf springs or are their other differences?

Thanks,


MarkV
 
  #2  
Old 02-27-2017, 03:09 PM
tacomacream's Avatar
tacomacream
tacomacream is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Wenatchee
Posts: 1,411
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkV
Hello,

I am beginning to look for my first big truck project and have my heart set on finding a 1940-1947 Ford truck. I am discovering that many folks don't know what type of truck it is that they have parked out in their field. How can you tell a 1.5 ton, 2 ton, and 3 ton truck apart? Is it just a matter of counting leaf springs or are their other differences?

Thanks,


MarkV
Welcome to the Forum. Here is some good information:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...rd-trucks.html
 
  #3  
Old 02-27-2017, 04:51 PM
WQ59B's Avatar
WQ59B
WQ59B is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
taco~ in looking at the linked brochure COE pages, it looks like there at least the rear springs DO discern between 1.5 & 2-ton… unless I missed another feature. 2-stage springs = 2T. I got that right?
 
  #4  
Old 02-27-2017, 05:06 PM
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
willowbilly3 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I think the 1.5 ton just has a single thickness frame and the 2-3 ton have the double.
 
  #5  
Old 02-27-2017, 05:59 PM
tacomacream's Avatar
tacomacream
tacomacream is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Wenatchee
Posts: 1,411
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by WQ59B
taco~ in looking at the linked brochure COE pages, it looks like there at least the rear springs DO discern between 1.5 & 2-ton… unless I missed another feature. 2-stage springs = 2T. I got that right?
You are on track; I don't see any differences with the COE, other than the springs. Both options are heavy duty.

1.5


2
 
  #6  
Old 02-28-2017, 08:26 AM
47COE's Avatar
47COE
47COE is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Vacuum brake booster is standard on 2 ton trucks. Optional on 1.5 ton. So no booster means 1.5 ton. Trucks that have a booster are probably 2 ton but might be 1.5 ton.

My truck has no booster so it is 1.5 ton.
 
  #7  
Old 02-28-2017, 08:58 AM
tacomacream's Avatar
tacomacream
tacomacream is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Wenatchee
Posts: 1,411
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
After looking at your brochure I see that you are right! There is a lot of fine print there, lol. After all you have one of these trucks.
When reading this there was always this: ,

I am thinking that if a buyer was really wanting the truck his way, he could have it built however he wanted it to be. So there could be many combinations. I think that would happen very rarely though. Again, thanks for posting the brochure!
 
  #8  
Old 02-28-2017, 09:47 AM
47COE's Avatar
47COE
47COE is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I doubt there were many factory special orders right after the war. With pent up demand, anything that made it to a dealer probably sold as is. But yes, there were a lot of options and configurations.





And a lot of mods have probably been done in the last 70+ years. For example my truck had a Watson 3 speed transmission added at one time, probably in the 50s. A mod that I'm very thankful for given that I use my truck and live in hill country.

Tom
 
  #9  
Old 02-28-2017, 12:18 PM
MarkV's Avatar
MarkV
MarkV is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, great responses!

I read the great 1947 literature (thanks again) and it raises a couple of questions:

1. Do the descriptions given in the 1947 literature accurately represent what was available throughout the 1940-47 period? I am thinking that sometimes items that are unavailable or optional earlier become standard or optional later on. If so then I may need to consider the model year when I look at a feature on a truck to figure out if it is a 1 1/2 Ton Model or a 2 Ton Model.

2. The "small print" in the 1947 product literature seems to say that a 1 1/2 Ton Model truck could have been ordered with all the bolt-on features found on the 2 Ton Model. If so, what really distinguishes the two models?


The comment about few folks special-ordering a truck right after the war and just taking what was coming off the line is also interesting. I looked into the Army's use of these trucks during the war, and what was coming off the line during the war seems to have been the Ford 4 x 2 6-cyl. 158" w.b. Chassis truck that was rated at 1 1/2 tons. (Please let me know if I am wrong!)


Standard Military Motor Vehicles



Interestingly, the "S.M. 2451" manual on the British Army version of this truck (they were made in the USA or Canada) says "Nominal rating 1 1/2 tons. Actual rating 3 tons for road work (with the special tyre equipment, reinforced frame and auxiliary springs as being supplied on S.M. 2451)." In other words the standard British Army 3 Ton version appears to have been a Ford "1 1/2 Ton Model" truck with the bolt-on options of the heavier truck.


S.M.2451

On a related note, the 1947 product literature calls out a gross vehicle weight for the 1 1/2 Ton Model of 12,500 LBS. which appears to be more that 6,000 LBS. above the empty weight of the truck, so I am guessing this number was for a 1 1/2 Ton Model with all of the 2 Ton Model bolt-on options.


1947 Product Literature



PS - A little digging online turned up the information that trucks for use by the British in North Africa were either ordered with the V8 or had V8 crate engines swapped into them at their first major overhaul. - In case you are wondering, I am looking to restore one to its WWII British Army specs, as used in North Africa, because I have to have a V8.

MarkV
 
  #10  
Old 02-28-2017, 01:35 PM
47COE's Avatar
47COE
47COE is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not a lot of changes during the 40s because of the war. So I would expect little different between 41 and 47, at least for heavy trucks. Certainly my 41 and 47 COE trucks are about the same other than the Marmon Harrington conversion for the 41.

Military trucks are a different story. Pretty much Ford standard except for the wheels. The military standardized on 6 lug wheels so that's what Ford supplied for military trucks instead of their standard 5 lug wheels.

I don't know who pays attention to the advertised load rating of trucks. I routinely haul 3 ton loads with my 1 1/2 ton truck. A few times I've gone up to 5 tons if that meant one less trip. The empty weight of my 47 is about 6000 lbs. The licensed weight limit is 18,000 lbs. Notice that the 2 ton gvw in the brochure is a ton more than the 1 1/2 ton gvw. It may be that there is a bit more steel in the 2 ton frames. The brochure does say that there is more reinforcement in the longer wheelbase frames.

For military trucks the enemy was trying hard to destroy them, so I doubt anyone worried about wearing them out by overloading them.
 
  #11  
Old 02-28-2017, 01:41 PM
tacomacream's Avatar
tacomacream
tacomacream is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Wenatchee
Posts: 1,411
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Well, we were talking about the COE trucks. The Military trucks were built to a higher standard than the civilian units. But not all of them were. Hey, it is your thread, OK let's get back on track.
 
  #12  
Old 02-28-2017, 05:31 PM
WQ59B's Avatar
WQ59B
WQ59B is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've never seen any factory lit referencing a vacuum booster for 1940.
Hell, I have a manual shift Eaton on mine.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldrelics
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
1
08-08-2018 09:43 PM
kc0kfg
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
14
01-03-2010 08:35 AM
ford390gashog
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
03-25-2005 04:23 PM
badass_dodge74
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
04-30-2003 02:36 PM



Quick Reply: What is it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.