Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

A/C Questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-24-2010, 04:55 PM
wickedmax13's Avatar
wickedmax13
wickedmax13 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A/C Questions.

So my air went out on my 91 f150. I bought the kit from autozone and the retrofit kit with the fittings. This is probably a stupid question but which port is the low pressure port? I'm thinking it is the port on the passenger side because thats the only port the low pressure fitting fits on duh. Before I started tinkering with it the guy at autozone told me the port on the driver side was the low pressure so I pulled the valve stem out so I could fit the retrofit fittings. Come to find out the fitting was the wrong one and now my high pressure port doesnt have a valve stem in it (and i broke it when I was pulling it out) Can I buy just a valve stem somewhere or am I going to have to replace the whole assembly? As always thanks in advance.
 
  #2  
Old 07-24-2010, 05:01 PM
subford's Avatar
subford
subford is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Easton,Ks
Posts: 23,603
Likes: 0
Received 228 Likes on 177 Posts
Yes any auto parts place should have one.



/
 
  #3  
Old 07-24-2010, 05:05 PM
wickedmax13's Avatar
wickedmax13
wickedmax13 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awesome! This is exactly what I needed! Now only if I could get ahold of all of the other diagrams just like this for the entire engine compartment so I know exactly where everything is. Where did this diagram come from?
 
  #4  
Old 07-24-2010, 05:18 PM
subford's Avatar
subford
subford is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Easton,Ks
Posts: 23,603
Likes: 0
Received 228 Likes on 177 Posts
The diagram came from the Ford shop manual.
You can buy them at Helminc.
 
  #5  
Old 07-24-2010, 11:04 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,586
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
I hate to burst your bubble but those so-called retrofit kits very well may cost more money in the long run. It is a well known FACT the oils used in R-12 systems and R-134a are not compatible. The mineral oil used in R-12 systems hold residual chlorine from the refrigerant, when you introduce PAG or ester oil along with the R-134a bad things can happen.

I highly suggest to explore drop in replacements such as Freeze 12, Duracool, AutoFrost, etc. instead of of those cheap-a** kits at the retail stores. They work much better without the potential for causing catastrophic failure as a half-a**ed R-134a conversion.

But hey, it's only money.....
 
  #6  
Old 07-24-2010, 11:44 PM
lsrx101's Avatar
lsrx101
lsrx101 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lorain County, Ohio
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by rla2005
I hate to burst your bubble but those so-called retrofit kits very well may cost more money in the long run. It is a well known FACT the oils used in R-12 systems and R-134a are not compatible. The mineral oil used in R-12 systems hold residual chlorine from the refrigerant, when you introduce PAG or ester oil along with the R-134a bad things can happen.

I highly suggest to explore drop in replacements such as Freeze 12, Duracool, AutoFrost, etc. instead of of those cheap-a** kits at the retail stores. They work much better without the potential for causing catastrophic failure as a half-a**ed R-134a conversion.

But hey, it's only money.....

Actually, I would suggest doing the conversion correctly by flushing the system and adding back the correct oil.
Those "drop in replacements" (there's really no such thing) are just as bad as the cheap-a**ed kits. Each one of them has their own laundry list of potential issues too.
The only one I would even think about recommending is Freeze12, but that would only be if an alternate was absolutely necessary. It's far from a be-all, end-all, and not a "drop in" either.
 
  #7  
Old 07-25-2010, 11:52 AM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,586
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
I guess we can agree to disagree on replacement refrigerants. I have used AutoFrost successfully in several vehicles for the last 7 years. I have experienced no increase in vent temperatures or much differences in pressures from R-12. You are correct to do the job right does require a flushing regardless of which refrigerant you choose.

The last vehicle I put AutoFrost in, my current '92 F-350, I did a cheap and dirty style fill after replacing the condenser after the output fitting cracked. I replaced the receiver/driver, various 0-rings, pulled a vacuum for 90 minutes, verified it held a vacuum for over 2 hours then filled it with AutoFrost. So far so good, never did do a flush just to see what happens. I might get lucky!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sullid01
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
6
02-14-2011 03:02 PM
pitmanr2003
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
8
05-12-2009 05:08 PM
PHWLEE
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
10
12-01-2006 07:42 AM
F250reddog
Cooling, Heating, Ventilation & A/C
7
03-23-2004 09:16 AM



Quick Reply: A/C Questions.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.