1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

What the best rear axle ratio for my '54 F100?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-02-2010, 02:58 AM
55 f350's Avatar
55 f350
55 f350 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: springfield il
Posts: 5,776
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
this comes up all the time eh guys and gals ???? LOL !!!!!! i have i think , 3.92's in the dana in my 53 with a flatty . it is not a highway hauler by no means !!! i have a 8.8 diff laying around and or a t5 now to help with that lil' issue . my 8.8 is sporting 3.08's and seems to be a fair trade off in my mind . she's not gonna be hauling a load or any a-- from the lights anymore so .... never was a race truck anyways !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! flatties are cool but they aren't as powerful as they sound LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  #17  
Old 06-02-2010, 03:02 PM
55f100tx's Avatar
55f100tx
55f100tx is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HD74
I've done a search on this topic more than once and have not found any such thing as a top loader 4 speed with the forth being overdrive. There was the T170 SROD overdrive, which would be a good choice.
As far as 3.00 or 3.25 gear set, IMHO you would have a hard time get out of your own way, least that's my experience at high altitude (5300ft or higher). I base that on a hopped up FH with a T19 tranny.
I had a 4 speed top loader with overdrive 4th is a 84 ford van with a 300 six. those transmissions are everywhere. They also came in 80's broncos. The shifter mounts on the side just like the standard ford top loader in torinos and mustangs.the srod is a later internal shift version of it. Is it as strong as the old muscle car 4 speeds? nope but its plenty strong. My father in law put one behind a ford diesel pickup back in the early 90's never had a problem. And they shift good. you can find them on craigs list for a couple hundred bucks.
 
  #18  
Old 06-05-2010, 02:50 PM
carbs & chrome's Avatar
carbs & chrome
carbs & chrome is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by snipa
Rather than going through the hastle of a new rear end how about putting overdrive in?
I have been looking @ a T5 conversion. Would it be a better option in people's opinion? If I did that would the stock rear gears be ok?

And thanks for all the help so far.
 
  #19  
Old 06-05-2010, 10:48 PM
55f100tx's Avatar
55f100tx
55f100tx is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
t 5's are great transmissions. adaptors avialible for almost any engine. i may be wrong on this but im thinking the overdrive gear is .68 it will really bring down the rev's. multiply the .68 by your axle ratio and it will give you the final drive ratio.
 
  #20  
Old 06-06-2010, 01:21 AM
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
jmadsen is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,315
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
I havent driven my truck yet, (still in pieces) but I have a T-5 Trans going in it with a 3.5 9" rear so I hope I'll have a decent set up all around. it will be powered by a 255+ Flathead also.
I have the Dwight Bonds t-5 adapter plate and the hogshead half bell.
I have extra hogs head bell's if you do end up going that route? and I'm local.

looks like a nice truck btw
 
  #21  
Old 06-06-2010, 07:06 AM
e william's Avatar
e william
e william is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.C.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi to all, havnt been on site in a while. 1954 F100

I run a 239-y (030 over) to a 1964 3-speed to the stock dana 44 with 3.92.
Runs well in city and on highway, the duals sound great and I have been known to run in the 70 + mph. range on freeway. The 239 just purrs and I,m guessing I'm in the 2800 to 3000 rpm range but I have recently installed a VDO rpm guage and will be checking the rpms soon.
Ed
 
  #22  
Old 06-06-2010, 12:08 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,802
Received 608 Likes on 378 Posts
Originally Posted by HD74
I've done a search on this topic more than once and have not found any such thing as a top loader 4 speed with the forth being overdrive. There was the T170 SROD overdrive, which would be a good choice.
As far as 3.00 or 3.25 gear set, IMHO you would have a hard time get out of your own way, least that's my experience at high altitude (5300ft or higher). I base that on a hopped up FH with a T19 tranny.
I agree about the 3.0 gears being just too tall.

Here is the 4-sp OD trans mentioned, there are actually several variations of it, SROD, SMOD yadda yadda. Dick /4TL8Ford pointed us to these some years ago. They are not really top-loaders, but had shifters mounted on top, close enough.
 
Attached Images  
  #23  
Old 06-06-2010, 12:36 PM
5 Star's Avatar
5 Star
5 Star is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jake

Sounds like you have the perfect setup, and with the 6 haveing a little more torque, the auto trans and the diff that goes with it.
I looked all over a few years back for a diff from a 51 merc that was an automaic trans car and the diff was a 3.31

just a throw in a friend of mine runs a stock Flathead V8 Pickup, with 235 75 R 16 tires and he runs the hill of PA down to Pigeon Forge.
I had asked him how it handled the hills and his reply was no problem, it worked great.

It all depends on what terrain your running on, your better off to have a little reserve than not enough.
What I'm refering to here is Prarie flatlang running is great until you get a head wind then your engine is working.
It would be great to run 3.00 but what if your in a situation as above.
Tha automatic will handle it as will the O/D with a 3.78 setup, then again its J.M.O..
 
  #24  
Old 06-07-2010, 12:48 AM
Julies Cool F1's Avatar
Julies Cool F1
Julies Cool F1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Poway, Ca.
Posts: 7,641
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
This discussion just busts me up. It's the typical "let's reinvent the wheel" type of thing.

We have had this discussion so many times in the past two year that I have been here (and probably 50 before then) I have these ratios memorized.

And LOL it always irons out to be the same result: 3.00 is a little too tall with a 3 speed but maybe ok with a 4 spd; 3.25 to 3.50 is ideal, and 3.73 is a little reaching.

You tend to get a little looney when you come here every day! (ok well that's my excuse!)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jamusfam
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
04-24-2014 06:20 PM
Herrerag92
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
05-24-2012 11:13 PM
lwclark
1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
05-01-2012 06:28 AM
mbarrad
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
02-23-2012 04:36 PM
nash22
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
10-12-2011 07:58 PM



Quick Reply: What the best rear axle ratio for my '54 F100?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.