1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

302 in a 52 f1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:13 PM
lgwitt's Avatar
lgwitt
lgwitt is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
302 in a 52 f1

I have the motor and trans just sitting in the truck for the first time.

Do I set the front of the engine to the 6 cyl or 8 cyl place for the radiator mount.

The trans mount seems to want to set on or near the original cross member.

Any advice is greatly appreciated.

Les Witt
 
  #2  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:29 PM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
52 Merc is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burbank, WA
Posts: 13,923
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,398 Posts
Congratulations on the progress of your project!

I don't think it will matter which placement your radiator is in. As long as you have room for the fan, you'll be fine. I had a 289 in a 50 F1 with a c4 trans. It was originally a 6 cylinder truck and there was a mile of clearance. If your truck was originally a V8, I don't see a problem. I used the stock rad too, and never had a cooling issue.

My c4 trans mount was also right on the crossmember. You didn't say what trans you're using, but the SBF/C4 combo is a very easy fit.
 
  #3  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:39 PM
Old F1's Avatar
Old F1
Old F1 is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Windermere Valley,B.C. Ca
Posts: 2,722
Received 66 Likes on 49 Posts
Just a nonspecific to model, generic answer.

The chances of any mount lining up with any existing mount are unlikely.

Just my way of doing this, with the fan on the engine so that you know the complete length mount the engine back almost touching the fire wall and see if you have radiator clearance. (2-3 inches). You might have to move the rad forward at this point or if lots of room move both forward if you like. The firewall / rear of engine are the determining factors being the hardest to modify, but on some applications the fire wall has to be massaged as well.
 
  #4  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:00 PM
Julies Cool F1's Avatar
Julies Cool F1
Julies Cool F1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Poway, Ca.
Posts: 7,641
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
I agree with Old F1 on the firewall distance and height. Of course if you have to move it forward an inch to use the original tranny cross mount, do it.

But, on the radiator clearance, I would mount the radiator (whether it fits onto the original mounting locations or not) about an inch from the fan clutch front, and plan to use a fan shroud!
 
  #5  
Old 05-29-2010, 08:18 PM
lgwitt's Avatar
lgwitt
lgwitt is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am just learning. Should I cut away a piece of the original cross member to make a mount ane weld in a piece to mount the transmission.

Should I be trying to mount the engine to get close to the pinion angle.

Thanks for all your help.

Les
 
  #6  
Old 05-29-2010, 10:16 PM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
52 Merc is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burbank, WA
Posts: 13,923
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,398 Posts
You can pretty much make any modification necessary to build transmission and motor mounts. Just be sure to properly brace or reinforce anything you cut to maintain structural integrity.

Ideally, you want the carburetor pad on the intake manifold to be level. In doing so, it should angle the engine back a few degrees to match the pinion angle. These are two things you want to check when doing your installation. One thing you need to avoid, though, is having the driveshaft perfectly inline between the transmission and differential. There has to be some angle in that for the u-joints to work properly. Somewhere in here is a great tutorial on how driveshafts work. You might look for it, or hopefully someone who has it bookmarked will post the link for you.
 
  #7  
Old 05-30-2010, 10:33 AM
Julies Cool F1's Avatar
Julies Cool F1
Julies Cool F1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Poway, Ca.
Posts: 7,641
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Waynes right on about the carb being level. The pinion angle can be adjusted with shims under the back springs if necessary.

Here is the write up by Jon Niolon on the drive line phasing & pinion angle. Attention should be placed on both horizontal (up down) and logitudinal (side to side) angles.

Mine was off 15 degrees and presented some substantial vibration problems. After being fixed, it was as smooth as can be.

Here's the link:

http://www.clubfte.com/users/jniolon...nephasing.html
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
calgearhead
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
08-08-2008 11:48 PM
60FordF100
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
10-14-2007 04:57 PM
Cheshire Cat
1966 - 1977 Early Broncos
6
03-15-2007 01:33 PM
dbiscayne
1966 - 1977 Early Broncos
10
01-14-2007 12:37 AM



Quick Reply: 302 in a 52 f1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.