powerstroke in an f-100
#16
#17
i have a '83' ranger and i can tell you that you won't be happy with the 2.2 ranger engine, it only has 56 hp. 0-60 is about 28 sec's. on a good day.
i've been checking into a 3.3 or a 3.9 4bt cummins. the difference between the two. is the 3.9 is 200 lbs and 3" higher and 3" longer than the 3.3.
also the 3.3 is a comon rail system.
cc
i've been checking into a 3.3 or a 3.9 4bt cummins. the difference between the two. is the 3.9 is 200 lbs and 3" higher and 3" longer than the 3.3.
also the 3.3 is a comon rail system.
cc
#18
I saw a diesel in a '56 years ago at the 1st Supernationals I made. The owner said it came out of a delivery truck and got about 45 MPG. I don't know what he had as a frame.
The last few years I've seen crewcab modifications (there were 2 at last years Smoky Mt. F100 run - right?) but I think they are always on the Superduty frame. I don't know what kind of modifications the body would need to get that done! Putting an extra 3'+ in the cab to make it crew would be enough to talk me out of it!!
The last few years I've seen crewcab modifications (there were 2 at last years Smoky Mt. F100 run - right?) but I think they are always on the Superduty frame. I don't know what kind of modifications the body would need to get that done! Putting an extra 3'+ in the cab to make it crew would be enough to talk me out of it!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maribou912
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
10-10-2011 08:45 AM