No topic thread,,, Part 2
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,689
Received 1,354 Likes
on
1,113 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Bay Ont Canada
Posts: 161,148
Received 5,160 Likes
on
1,689 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,689
Received 1,354 Likes
on
1,113 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Bay Ont Canada
Posts: 161,148
Received 5,160 Likes
on
1,689 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Bay Ont Canada
Posts: 161,148
Received 5,160 Likes
on
1,689 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,689
Received 1,354 Likes
on
1,113 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Bay Ont Canada
Posts: 161,148
Received 5,160 Likes
on
1,689 Posts
Evening Gerry... Today I cleaned up my jobsite/new house... Hauled a dump trailer load of garbage to the landfill site, weighed about 1k, plus the weight of the dump trailer. Driving this 5.0L compared to my Ecoboost, I wouldn't buy a 5.0L for a work truck. You can definitely notice the 40lbft of torque missing.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,689
Received 1,354 Likes
on
1,113 Posts
Good evening Gerry, hope your weather is as nice as our`s.
Too bad about the 5.0 Sherm, I was hoping it was a real rocket and good for pulling.
Yes, 6.2 is the large V8 offered. I have driven a F350 with the 6.2 (no trailer), and "seat of the pants" tells me that its no where near the torque:weight ratio of the ecoboost in the F150.
Take right from ford.ca, the F150 XLT Crew/6.5' box with with Ecoboost power weighs 5716lbs and the Ecoboost puts out 365hp/420lbft of torque. Power:weight = 0.064hp per pound, Torque:weight = 0.073lbft per pound.
F350 XLT Crew 6.5 with 6.2L weighs 6787lbs and the 6.2L puts 385hp/405lbft of torque. Power:weight = 0.057hp/pound, Torqueound = 0.06lbft/lb...
I don't know how that translates into 0-60 times when towing a similar load, but I do know the F350/gas didn't feel as perky as the Ecoboost when empty.
For poops and grins, lets look at the 6.2 in a F150. Only offered in Lariat trim, weight of 5716lbs, power/torque is 411/434. Ratios are 0.072 hp/lb, 0.076lbft/lb... Compared to the Ecoboost, a 6.2L powered truck has a "noticably better hp/lb ratio, but not much difference in the torque.
One could go further to figure out the hp/$ spent, but thats enough numbers for me I like my ecoboost, hope I get it back soon.
Take right from ford.ca, the F150 XLT Crew/6.5' box with with Ecoboost power weighs 5716lbs and the Ecoboost puts out 365hp/420lbft of torque. Power:weight = 0.064hp per pound, Torque:weight = 0.073lbft per pound.
F350 XLT Crew 6.5 with 6.2L weighs 6787lbs and the 6.2L puts 385hp/405lbft of torque. Power:weight = 0.057hp/pound, Torqueound = 0.06lbft/lb...
I don't know how that translates into 0-60 times when towing a similar load, but I do know the F350/gas didn't feel as perky as the Ecoboost when empty.
For poops and grins, lets look at the 6.2 in a F150. Only offered in Lariat trim, weight of 5716lbs, power/torque is 411/434. Ratios are 0.072 hp/lb, 0.076lbft/lb... Compared to the Ecoboost, a 6.2L powered truck has a "noticably better hp/lb ratio, but not much difference in the torque.
One could go further to figure out the hp/$ spent, but thats enough numbers for me I like my ecoboost, hope I get it back soon.