2008 Election Thread
#1
#2
My first question to the membership is: As we did NOT discuss the position of Assistant Chapter Leader at our last meeting, do we continue to pursue this position for this election? I think we need to clearify this to let it continue. I also think that if anyone (else) wants to put their name in the hat for this position, we should reopen the nomination for another week for this position only. What say you, the membership?
#3
Originally Posted by BPofMD
My first question to the membership is: As we did NOT discuss the position of Assistant Chapter Leader at our last meeting, do we continue to pursue this position for this election? I think we need to clearify this to let it continue. I also think that if anyone (else) wants to put their name in the hat for this position, we should reopen the nomination for another week for this position only. What say you, the membership?
#4
#6
#7
Originally Posted by BPofMD
I DO NOT think it should be an appointed position as it would foster collusion or only the appearance of it. All those in favor of opening the nomination of Asst CL for a week, please post now. I vote yes, open for 1 week....to close on midnight, April 2nd, 2008.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by BPofMD
I DO NOT think it should be an appointed position as it would foster collusion or only the appearance of it. All those in favor of opening the nomination of Asst CL for a week, please post now. I vote yes, open for 1 week....to close on midnight, April 2nd, 2008.
If you remember when I said something about it I
did say "If I could nominate Bud as Asst. CL".
Although seeing as it has been posted and not
challenged it could stand, but I guess the right
thing to do would be open it up.
#11
#13
#15