Carb & Manifold Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-10-2007, 07:20 PM
gilllawn's Avatar
gilllawn
gilllawn is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carb & Manifold Question

Can you increase power and gas mileage by upgrading the stoc 2v carb on my 351m (1977) engine with a 4v carb and manifold setup? Is it really worth it?
 
  #2  
Old 11-10-2007, 08:12 PM
RJR99SS's Avatar
RJR99SS
RJR99SS is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It can increase milage as long as you keep your foot off the gas....which is pretty hard to do with with a 4 barrel. You'd probably want to add headers to see the full effect.
 
  #3  
Old 11-10-2007, 11:58 PM
roger dowty's Avatar
roger dowty
roger dowty is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: western montana
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the theory, which is all i really know, is that you can gain performance and increase mileage...like jrj99ss said....keeping foot out of it.

In theory every engine/build will perform best with a specific cfm and mixture of air and fuel. A 2bbl carb will be lower cfm, maybe 450-500 or so but its all in the primary action of the carb.

A 4bbl carb will have a higher overall cfm rating...say 600 but will only give a portion of that...much less than the 2bbl...say half... in the primary and then, when requested, it will open the secondaries and dump in the other half. So if you do not request acton from the secondaries you will save fuel and if you do want more you have an additional 100cfm or so to add....which boosts performance...sometimes rather significantly.

From what i gather, many will over carb...ie a 400 would have to spin (rpm) above it's typical usefull range to use more than 600cfm...but some will use a 750 etc. Theres a a lot i don't get about how it all works as each individual build will respond in it's own way. For example, in my '72 351cj...max hp is at 4600rpm and thus, it should not benefit from a carb over 600cfm...maybe even 500 cfm. But ford put a 750 on it as it gave the engine the best numbers with the smog requirments etc at the time. I don't get it it but oh well...maybe someday.

hope this helps you understand the principle anyway.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
paige539
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
10-14-2013 01:29 AM
mdr617
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
03-13-2011 03:48 PM
wphill
New Member Introductions
1
11-09-2007 08:43 PM
rswhitmore
Flathead V8 & Flathead 6
10
10-18-2007 09:45 PM
restorit
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
1
09-15-2001 05:40 PM



Quick Reply: Carb & Manifold Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.