Truck World truck comparison
#3
I'm not saying that the article is inaccurate, but it was staged by Ford at the Ford proving grounds in AZ, and some of the texts looks an awlful lot like the Ford Press Release on the SD a few weeks back.
I think that Ford PR had mucho input into the article.
Also, it would not be the 1st time that a manufacturer provided a test engine that had been highly "tuned" by the staff engineers. I doubt Ford made sure that the GM and DCX engines were running "right".
The article just has a funny smell to it. And does not strike me as being particularly objective.
I think that Ford PR had mucho input into the article.
Also, it would not be the 1st time that a manufacturer provided a test engine that had been highly "tuned" by the staff engineers. I doubt Ford made sure that the GM and DCX engines were running "right".
The article just has a funny smell to it. And does not strike me as being particularly objective.
#5
Anyone who does not believe that ANY company does not "stack the deck" in their favor is blissfully naive, no offense intended. They all do it, from pharmaceutical companies when designing studies to auto manufacturers in these "comparisons". Dodge can run the same test next week and the 600 will be the clear winner. Then it is Chevy's turn. I don't put a whole lot of credit into 0-60 times on these trucks, just do not believe that it reflects their intended purposes.
The superduty may well be the best but that blackeye from the 6.0 is still visible.
The superduty may well be the best but that blackeye from the 6.0 is still visible.
#7
A direct quote taken from the article:
The Ford, although slow out of the gate, reigned in the Dodge and Chevy within a few hundred yards. It continued to pull away through the end of the ¼-mile, besting the Dodge Cummins by two truck lengths and the Chevy by a good eight. The Ford Power Stroke and five-speed automatic really shine once the load gets rolling
So this means that everyone here who argues that the 3V 5.4 is a better motor than the Hemi because it has a slight low end advantage even though the Hemi beats it to the 1/4 mile now has to concede that the Cummins is a better motor than the 6.0 PSD for the very same reason. The Cummins obviously has the low end torque advantage over the PSD. If it is so important that the 5.4 has a slight low end advantage over the Hemi, surely it is even more critical in a 1 ton Heavy Duty truck right?
The F-250, with the gas V-10 and towing a 10,800-pound trailer, was more than two truck lengths ahead of the Chevy Silverado 2500 at the end of the quarter-mile. The Dodge Ram 2500 Hemi was more than five back.
So the 6.8, with a displacement and 2 cylinder advantage over the the other trucks was able to outpull them? I should hope so. Interestingly, it fails to say how the new 5.4 faired against the Dodge and Chevy, or what motor the Chevy had. I assume the 8.1?
The Ford, although slow out of the gate, reigned in the Dodge and Chevy within a few hundred yards. It continued to pull away through the end of the ¼-mile, besting the Dodge Cummins by two truck lengths and the Chevy by a good eight. The Ford Power Stroke and five-speed automatic really shine once the load gets rolling
So this means that everyone here who argues that the 3V 5.4 is a better motor than the Hemi because it has a slight low end advantage even though the Hemi beats it to the 1/4 mile now has to concede that the Cummins is a better motor than the 6.0 PSD for the very same reason. The Cummins obviously has the low end torque advantage over the PSD. If it is so important that the 5.4 has a slight low end advantage over the Hemi, surely it is even more critical in a 1 ton Heavy Duty truck right?
The F-250, with the gas V-10 and towing a 10,800-pound trailer, was more than two truck lengths ahead of the Chevy Silverado 2500 at the end of the quarter-mile. The Dodge Ram 2500 Hemi was more than five back.
So the 6.8, with a displacement and 2 cylinder advantage over the the other trucks was able to outpull them? I should hope so. Interestingly, it fails to say how the new 5.4 faired against the Dodge and Chevy, or what motor the Chevy had. I assume the 8.1?
Last edited by Ev2Demon; 07-13-2004 at 04:13 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Ev2Demon
The F-250, with the gas V-10 and towing a 10,800-pound trailer, was more than two truck lengths ahead of the Chevy Silverado 2500 at the end of the quarter-mile. The Dodge Ram 2500 Hemi was more than five back.
So the 6.8, with a displacement and 2 cylinder advantage over the the other trucks was able to outpull them? I should hope so. Interestingly, it fails to say how the new 5.4 faired against the Dodge and Chevy, or what motor the Chevy had. I assume the 8.1?
So the 6.8, with a displacement and 2 cylinder advantage over the the other trucks was able to outpull them? I should hope so. Interestingly, it fails to say how the new 5.4 faired against the Dodge and Chevy, or what motor the Chevy had. I assume the 8.1?
So youre conseeding that the best Ford Gass motor is beter than the best Chevy and Dodge gass motors??? It's about time you saw the light.
#10
Sure, I'd be willing to say that. I'm actually pretty disappointed that Dodge doesn't offer a larger gas motor in their heavy duty trucks. I know the V10 in my Super Duty is a better motor than the Hemi would be for it's application.
What I would like to see is how the 5.4 fairs against the Hemi in a HD application. Not everyone buys V10's you know. The motors are closely matched and it would be a good comparison. I wonder why this test didn't
show it?
Oh, and where do you see eight truck lengths? I see five. Again, where would the all powerful 3V 5.4 have placed in the same test?
What I would like to see is how the 5.4 fairs against the Hemi in a HD application. Not everyone buys V10's you know. The motors are closely matched and it would be a good comparison. I wonder why this test didn't
show it?
Oh, and where do you see eight truck lengths? I see five. Again, where would the all powerful 3V 5.4 have placed in the same test?
#11
#13
uh, I thought they still offered a Magnum as standard
Just checked Dodge.com and the base V8 is a 4.7 Magnum
http://www-5.dodge.com/vehiclecompar...pareMatrix.jam
Just checked Dodge.com and the base V8 is a 4.7 Magnum
http://www-5.dodge.com/vehiclecompar...pareMatrix.jam
Last edited by tyzf150; 07-13-2004 at 05:16 PM. Reason: add link
#14
Originally Posted by tyzf150
uh, I thought they still offered a Magnum as standard
Just checked Dodge.com and the base V8 is a 4.7 Magnum
http://www-5.dodge.com/vehiclecompar...pareMatrix.jam
Just checked Dodge.com and the base V8 is a 4.7 Magnum
http://www-5.dodge.com/vehiclecompar...pareMatrix.jam
look here:
http://www.dodge.com/ram_2500_3500/i...type=bottomImg
#15
You know I didnt get it when it said the 6.0 with 325hp and 570 lbs torque is class leading???? Maybe they need to look at the numbers again...
I might conceed that the auto 6.0 would beat the auto 600....being that the 600 is a four speed...sure bet it would be a different story with the 600 with another gear, maybe split on the high end....Id like to see the 6spds also, bet that would be a different story to...
As for the gassers, I sure would hope that the hemi wouldnt match them, its alot smaller than the v10 6.8 or the 8.1.....I think dodge needs a big HD gasser, and stop depending so much on the hype of the smaller hemi....
As for the 05 ford, looks pretty sharpe...Im sure it is a great truck...
I might conceed that the auto 6.0 would beat the auto 600....being that the 600 is a four speed...sure bet it would be a different story with the 600 with another gear, maybe split on the high end....Id like to see the 6spds also, bet that would be a different story to...
As for the gassers, I sure would hope that the hemi wouldnt match them, its alot smaller than the v10 6.8 or the 8.1.....I think dodge needs a big HD gasser, and stop depending so much on the hype of the smaller hemi....
As for the 05 ford, looks pretty sharpe...Im sure it is a great truck...