302 flywheel confusion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-08-2006, 09:09 PM
mh822's Avatar
mh822
mh822 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 302 flywheel confusion

how do i identify a 302 flywheel? i bought a used 302 that was bolted to an automatic tranny. i took the flexplate to the junkyard and found a flywheel that matched it in diameter and bolt pattern and put it in my truck and now the starter doesn't hit the damn flywheel. i have another flywheel but don't know if its the right one either. the number on it is RF-EIZR6380-A2A.from what i understand the 302 is externally balanced and will shake itself apart w/ the wrong flywheel. can anyone help?
 
  #2  
Old 02-08-2006, 10:29 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
TigerDan is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 12,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Hi and welcome to FTE! Please take a moment to check out the guidelines, they contain important info that you'll need when posting here.

There are a few things to be aware of when undertaking your search. Yes, the 302 is externally balanced, and there were two different imbalances used. All engines in the 90º-V family had a 28oz. imbalance up to 1981. At that time it was changed to 50oz. for the 302/5.0 but remained at 28oz. for the 351W/5.8 while keeping the same bolt pattern. So mixing the imbalance is not a good idea if you value your engine. The 300-6 used the same pattern as well but is a zero balance flywheel so it fits, but won't work balance-wise.
So, if your engine is pre-1981 you want a 28oz. imbalance, if '81 or newer you want 50oz.

There are several different diameters of flywheel as well. You need to count the number of teeth on the flywheel, the most common ones have a tooth count of 157 and 164. There was a smaller one, I think it was 147 that was used on the Mustang II with the 302. A bit rare as you can imagine. The bellhousing has to match the flywheel for size as well. If you use a 157-tooth flywheel in a bellhousing designed for a 164, the starter won't engage but will simply spin free. If the reverse, the Bendix will slam against the flywheel but not engage the teeth.

The number you give above identifies that flywheel as an '81, so it should be right on the changeover and should be 50oz. Make sure that it has a counterweight cast into the back for the imbalance. Here's a 50oz flywheel off of an '88 5.0:



Note the imbalance weight on the back. A 28oz. imbalance is about half that wide.

Now here's a pair of block plates side by side:



The one on the left is for that same 157 tooth '88 5.0 that the flywheel came off of. The one on the right is an older one for a 164-tooth flywheel belhousing.

Here's what they look like when they're overlayed and the block mounting bolt holes lined up:




You can clearly see the difference in the starter mounting location beteen the two.
Hope this all is of some little help to you. Please feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

NOTE: If anyone is having problems viewing the images due to slow loading, let me know and I'll change them to links.
 

Last edited by TigerDan; 02-08-2006 at 10:33 PM.
  #3  
Old 02-09-2006, 08:07 AM
312's Avatar
312
312 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you can also have the wrong end on your starter.a standard has a different end than the automatic.
 
  #4  
Old 02-09-2006, 09:12 PM
mh822's Avatar
mh822
mh822 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tiger dan,if i was gay i'd ask you to marry me. your a genius!! i've been asking every so called ford guy the same question for so long i can't even remember when i started. this project has been put on the back burner time and time again over a stupid freaking flywheel.i obviously need to use the two 157 tooth 28 & 50 oz flywheels that i have for giant paper weights and get the right damn flywheel so i can put this truck back on the road. thanks a billion.
 

Last edited by TigerDan; 02-10-2006 at 06:50 PM.
  #5  
Old 02-09-2006, 09:26 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
TigerDan is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 12,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Whoa, hold on there big fella! Appreciation is one thing, but let's not get carried away...!

Hopefully, it all works out for you. Keep us posted!
 
  #6  
Old 02-09-2006, 10:22 PM
mh822's Avatar
mh822
mh822 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry, i got excited. for the first time in years i see an end to my project. well wait, i doubt i'll ever see the end. but maybe i'll be driving soon
 
  #7  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:47 PM
Q 5.0L's Avatar
Q 5.0L
Q 5.0L is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
=[ help

i have an 81 ford f150 with the 302....i also have a 1991 ford thunderbird sport with the 302 engine....im changing the tbird from automatic to manual, the tranny and everything else is great except im having 2 problems....the 91 tbird 5.0s didnt come stick, so the parts are hard to come by......i want to know if the flywheel from the 81 f150 will work with the 91 tbird??? i have 2 numbers from hollanders 57th interchange book for the flywheel....they are as followed E9SE-BC PART#846 and E9SE-CB PART#847 .....the last one is the flywheel for the 302 in the tbird, except its been discontinued. i believe the flywheel i need needs to be 13.3 in diameter, and 157 tooth?????

also in the tbird i need the high pressure plastic line that goes from the master cylinder to the slave cylinder...anyone know where to get it? ive tried everywhere....or maybe knows an alternative???

sorry i seem so lost about all this, ive been around cars my whole life and havent done anything like this yet, its my entrance project for Universal Technical Institute. If anyone has any answers or advice then please either reply to this post or email me at SpiralOfChaos420@aol.com anytime....thank you =] =] =]
 
  #8  
Old 04-22-2008, 05:28 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The flywheel may or may not work depending on the balance - I believe it changed in the middle of '81. Although - and hopefully someone can confirm this since I'm not 100%- as long as you change the harmonic balancer to the correct weight imbablance you can use either the 28 or 50 oz. imbalance flywheel on any engine. Right?

Which tranny are you installing? I'd suggest harvesting a Mustang for the conversion parts.

The size/teeth depends on what bellhousing you've got. Just go to Napa or whatever and get the correct one for your tranny donor vehicle.
 
  #9  
Old 04-22-2008, 08:20 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
TigerDan is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 12,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Hi Q 5.0L and Welcome to the site!

As BVA suggested above, you can source most of the parts you need from a Mustang as the drivetrain was basically the same between the 'Stang and the 'Bird. Look for early '80s to mid '90s 5.0 Mustangs for parts, lots of them out there.

As for whther or not your F150 flywheel will work in the 'Bird, look first at the imbalance pad on the back of the flywheel and compare it to the pic below. Since '81 was right on the changeover, it could go either way:



On the left is the earlier 28oz. imbalance flywheel, on the right the later 50oz. If that checks out okay and you have a 50oz. flywheel, then check the tooth count. It should be 157 for a 5.0 Mustang T-5 which is what I presume you're using (you are using a World Class T-5, aren't you?) Provided it meets these two criteria, then you should be good to go, If not, then you'll need to find another flywheel.

Originally Posted by BaronVonAutomatc
...and hopefully someone can confirm this since I'm not 100%- as long as you change the harmonic balancer to the correct weight imbablance you can use either the 28 or 50 oz. imbalance flywheel on any engine. Right?
'Fraid not. The crankshafts are balanced differently so you must match flywheel and dampener imbalance to the correct crankshaft.

As for the plastic hydraulic line, the Mustang used a cable-operated clutch. What are you using for a pedal assembly in the T-bird that calls for a hydraulic clutch?

You may be able to source the line you need from a Ford Ranger, as they used a hydraulic clutch with the plastic line. When I installed a 5.0 in my Ranger, I converted the 5.0/T-5 to hydraulic clutch and used the stock Ranger M/C assembly with a Jeep Cherokee slave cylinder, and used various fittings from the local parts store to connect the Ranger plastic line to the Cherokee hard line.

Hope there's some help for you in all of this...
 
  #10  
Old 09-26-2008, 04:05 PM
justshootme84's Avatar
justshootme84
justshootme84 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiger Dan, that's great info and makes me feel I'm on the right track with the same problem. While it's not a truck, this site feels more at home since I've been a member for awhile. Back to the question at hand;

I have a 66 Mustang, with a later-model 302 and C6 auto. the C6 went out, and I swapped a 4-sp manual in place. The casting numbers on the engine block are;

D90E-8015-E3A

Shows to be a 79/80 model 302 from like an LTD II. With a 28 oz flywheel and damper on it, the engine vibrates bad above 2000 rpm. Without pulling the motor and checking the cranskhaft, do you think a newer, 50 oz flywheel will solve the vibration problem/ The engine ran fine with the C6 and it's flexplate bolted up, and the vibes only started after the tranny swap. JSM84
 
  #11  
Old 09-26-2008, 04:45 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
TigerDan is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 12,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
It should be 28oz. Do you still have the original flexplate? It would be worth taking a look at, just as with a flywheel the imbalance weights on a 50oz. flexplate are noticeably larger than the 28oz. weights. Are you using the same dampener on the front that you were before?


28oz. (on left) vs. 50oz. (on right) dampeners



50.oz. (on left) vs. 28oz. (on right) flexplates

I'm thinking that by looking at the old flexplate you can tell for sure what your imbalance is, rather than dropping the tranny to swap in a 50oz. without being sure.
 
  #12  
Old 09-26-2008, 05:42 PM
justshootme84's Avatar
justshootme84
justshootme84 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the comparo pics!!! looking at both the old damper and flexplate show them to be for the 50 oz version. I removed the new flywheel today, and confirm that it's the 28 0z model, as well s the 'new'damper that wsa put on after the swap.
 
  #13  
Old 09-26-2008, 06:40 PM
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Beanscoot is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: May 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 2,030
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Well that must be a 50 oz in engine built using a D90E-8015-E3A block from the factory, or else it's a rebuild that used the earlier block with later internals.
Can you tell us the date code from the block? It should be just above the casting number.
 
  #14  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:27 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Beanscoot
Well that must be a 50 oz in engine built using a D90E-8015-E3A block from the factory, or else it's a rebuild that used the earlier block with later internals.
Can you tell us the date code from the block? It should be just above the casting number.
The casting number is D9OE-6015-E3A, not 8015. The engine group numbers are in the 6000's, the 8000 numbers refer to the cooling system.

D9OE-B3A = EOAZ-6010-A .. 302 Bare Block / Ford retrofitted this block for use in 1974/78's as a service part replacement, it also fits 1979 thru 1982's & 1983's before 12/1/1982.
 
  #15  
Old 09-29-2008, 01:53 PM
justshootme84's Avatar
justshootme84
justshootme84 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beanscoot
Well that must be a 50 oz in engine built using a D90E-8015-E3A block from the factory, or else it's a rebuild that used the earlier block with later internals.
Can you tell us the date code from the block? It should be just above the casting number.
The casting number is 100% definitely D90E-8015-E3A. I also thought that '6015' was the standard Engine Id series number. We did find a tag while cleaning the engine stating that it is a reman. from Ford dated 1993. So that would explain the 50 oz flexplate/ flywheel issue. Thanks for all the help, JSM84
 


Quick Reply: 302 flywheel confusion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.