K&N vs. Kool Blue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-08-2004, 12:32 PM
FiveO's Avatar
FiveO
FiveO is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K&N vs. Kool Blue

I have heard both of these are good filters, but which is better? and why? I live out in the country and drive dirt roads alot so I need one that traps dirt really well (just as good or better than stock).
 
  #2  
Old 05-11-2004, 08:10 AM
ranchero77's Avatar
ranchero77
ranchero77 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: in a house
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they are both better than stock paper elements. I think the kool blue filters smaller particles but in my opinion they are close enough that its just a prefernce in color. I have only used the K&N but have friends who have used both without complaints from either.
 
  #3  
Old 05-11-2004, 09:39 PM
jkorreck's Avatar
jkorreck
jkorreck is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cloth filters like k&n are higher flow but they let a small ammount more dirt through than a good paper filter, I read a study about this once, don't remember where though, if I run accross it again, I'll post it up here.
 
  #4  
Old 05-12-2004, 08:37 PM
ga302p's Avatar
ga302p
ga302p is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the numbers I have seen show the cloth filters catch smaller particles than the paper, when the cloth filter is PROPERLY OILED. If they are not oiled enough, they will let some pretty large stuff through.
 
  #5  
Old 05-13-2004, 10:19 AM
Bob Ayers's Avatar
Bob Ayers
Bob Ayers is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ga302p
All the numbers I have seen show the cloth filters catch smaller particles than the paper, when the cloth filter is PROPERLY OILED. If they are not oiled enough, they will let some pretty large stuff through.
Not true, K&N now offers a "precharger" filter to use with their regular filter in dusty conditions. The OEM paper filter will filter out smaller dirt particles.....
 
  #6  
Old 05-16-2004, 08:52 PM
ga302p's Avatar
ga302p
ga302p is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Ayers
Not true, K&N now offers a "precharger" filter to use with their regular filter in dusty conditions. The OEM paper filter will filter out smaller dirt particles.....
I am not exactly sure what the precharger is, I know what the K&N "pre filter" is. If it is what I am thinking it is, They have been using those for years at the dirt track. Moroso has made those things forever. They catch the larger particles and keep the actual filter cleaner to keep its flow up. You change the pre-filter between every round. Wash them and the real filter when you get back to the race shop.
 
  #7  
Old 05-19-2004, 08:38 PM
Cloim's Avatar
Cloim
Cloim is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ga302p
I am not exactly sure what the precharger is, I know what the K&N "pre filter" is.
Marketing.
"Now that you have our filter would you like to buy a filter for it?"
or
"Now that you have our filtercharger, would you like a precharger?"

Version A makes it sound like the filter isn't good enough.
Version B makes it sound like the added filtering will increase power.

They have four prefilters that I've seen.
The precharger is a polyester wrap.
The airforce precleaner is a foam wrap.
The wetsuit is a silicone treated foam wrap.
The drycharger is a silicone treated polyester wrap.

The silicone treatment is for repelling water in marine applications.

Originally Posted by ga302p
They catch the larger particles and keep the actual filter cleaner to keep its flow up.
There is another reason for them as well. K&N recommends that the prefilter be used in dusty environments. It isn't just to keep the filter clean. The dust will "wick" the oil out of the filter, thereby reducing it's ability to work.

At least that's the spin they put on it.

Originally Posted by K&N Instructions
CAUTION:
Extreme fine dust in agriculture or off-road use will pull the oil
from the element. Frequent re-oiling of the element's clean side might be required.
 
  #8  
Old 05-27-2004, 12:14 AM
72RADFORD72's Avatar
72RADFORD72
72RADFORD72 is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have not used a Kool Blue filter before but i do know one thing that you can probably find this cheaper than the KN...performance wise i put an KN on my 360 and i instantly felt a better throttle response i don't know about power but i could tell the difference instanty over the paper filter it replaced
 
  #9  
Old 05-27-2004, 09:42 AM
460me's Avatar
460me
460me is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 736
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
  #10  
Old 05-28-2004, 09:19 PM
ga302p's Avatar
ga302p
ga302p is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate to say it, but I believe the Fram "Air Hog" is better than both of them. I dont like Fram, as a rule.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LARIAT 85
Garage & Workshop
2
11-03-2015 04:01 PM
Turbo Dog
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
7
09-23-2015 10:55 AM
tilopa
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
09-21-2014 09:50 PM
grnlzrd
Electrical Systems/Wiring
3
06-03-2009 04:57 PM
durk
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
7
04-08-2006 03:54 PM



Quick Reply: K&N vs. Kool Blue



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.