Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-15-2003, 04:29 PM
inlineguy's Avatar
inlineguy
inlineguy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: onatrio, canada
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Today i started coop at a local gmc chev pontiac dealer and i worked on a 2003 2500 hd. it has only 12 000km but already is having some pretty major rearend problems. we had to replace the clutchpacks and ring and pinion. I think this is rediculous as its almost brand new. This is just Testament to the crap quality of chev driveline's.
 

Last edited by inlineguy; 09-15-2003 at 04:42 PM.
  #2  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:53 AM
jeb's Avatar
jeb
jeb is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

So you just started working there and you saw one truck with a problem. From that you extrapolate that chevy has crap drivelines? I owned 8 chevy trucks, the last one being an 01 2500HD 4x4 dmax/allison, before buying my 03 Excursion and I never had one driveline problem with any of them. I'd say ford has a worse track record than GM when it comes to drivelines.
 
  #3  
Old 09-19-2003, 11:27 AM
inlineguy's Avatar
inlineguy
inlineguy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: onatrio, canada
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

There has been more than one truck with this problem there has been about 10 trucks in the last month with the same problem.
 
  #4  
Old 09-19-2003, 12:27 PM
jeb's Avatar
jeb
jeb is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Why didn't you say that in your first post? 10 would maybe indicate some kind of problem but I'm sure you'd have said that in your first post to bolster your arguement if you'd known about it. If you didn't know about all 10 of them in the first place, it wouldn't really indicate "crap quality of chev drivelines". Something doesn't add up.

I follow some big GM forums and I rarely see posts about rearend problems.
 
  #5  
Old 09-19-2003, 05:17 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Well if you think that Ford has worse drivelines, tell me why many race cars out there run Ford 9" and 8.8" rear ends, and why so many racers out there use C6 and C4 trannies.
 
  #6  
Old 09-19-2003, 09:13 PM
inlineguy's Avatar
inlineguy
inlineguy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: onatrio, canada
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Yeah i haven't seen to many chev raerends out there at the track or offroad under good trucks. The ford 9 inch owns all forms of racing from the strip to the oval to the dirt.
 

Last edited by inlineguy; 09-19-2003 at 09:25 PM.
  #7  
Old 09-20-2003, 08:14 AM
jeb's Avatar
jeb
jeb is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

This thread was not about racing or race cars. That's a whole different ballgame.
 
  #8  
Old 09-20-2003, 11:13 AM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Ok then, when I am at the junkyard, I see thousands of GM rears going into the crusher, and the 9"/8.8" rears being sold. Thats good enough for me.
 
  #9  
Old 09-20-2003, 02:02 PM
jeb's Avatar
jeb
jeb is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Originally posted by mattsbox99
Ok then, when I am at the junkyard, I see thousands of GM rears going into the crusher, and the 9"/8.8" rears being sold. Thats good enough for me.
Well, that's nice and all but, again, that's not the subject.
 
  #10  
Old 09-20-2003, 07:57 PM
inlineguy's Avatar
inlineguy
inlineguy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: onatrio, canada
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Yeah but it just shows that ford rearends stand up better than general motors rearends. In the end if it wins on race day it must be better to begin with.
 
  #11  
Old 09-20-2003, 09:26 PM
jeb's Avatar
jeb
jeb is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

I disagree. Are we all running NASCAR motors in our vehicles? Racing has a whole different set of demands that aren't often practical in the real world.
 
  #12  
Old 09-20-2003, 09:42 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Are you not listening?
They hold up better in the real world too. I gave my example, and thats hard to beat, because in the end all cars end up in the junkyard, and when metal comes to metal, more gm rears go into the crusher and more 9"/8.8" rears go back on the market. They hold up better.
 
  #13  
Old 09-21-2003, 06:30 AM
jeb's Avatar
jeb
jeb is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Originally posted by mattsbox99
Are you not listening?
They hold up better in the real world too. I gave my example, and thats hard to beat, because in the end all cars end up in the junkyard, and when metal comes to metal, more gm rears go into the crusher and more 9"/8.8" rears go back on the market. They hold up better.
I'm listening. Are you? Racing is not the subject. Maybe ford rearends hold up a little better than GM over the long haul. Fine. Good for the junk yard divers. I'd bet the vast majority of those GM rearends going to the crusher were still good, too. Apparently the Ford rearend, from what you say, is better for racing but they all reliably serve John Q. Public getting to work everyday.

But the subject is "crap quality of GM drivelines" which has not been established.

In the first post, he only mentioned one bad rearend and extrapolates that into some trend. Then it magically turns into 10 (nice round number) in a month (he'd only been there 5 days) when I call him on it. So if I walked into my ford shop and saw them putting a tranny in a newer Super Duty, can I say that's a testament to how horrible the drivelines are on Fords?

Defects happen to every brand. Take a look at the 6.0 diesel page on this forum. Brand loyalty is okay. Brand blindness is another story.
 
  #14  
Old 09-21-2003, 07:55 PM
pfogle's Avatar
pfogle
pfogle is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oak Harbor, OH
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

My dad worked for a Chevy dealer when the duracrap came out, EVERY one of the first ones they sold came back because IT COULD NOT TOW! They had no power. I just watched an episode of Trucks today where they dynoed a duramax, 195hp at the wheels and 350ish torque......... That's kinda weak if you ask me......... Also the fact the scrapyard save the Ford rears and pitches the GM ones indicates which there is a market for. And yes most of the new engines in our trucks are directly related to the nascar and indy car engines. This is where most of the newer engines start out is at the track. If they do well then they get passed on the consumer.
 
  #15  
Old 09-22-2003, 12:33 PM
Carlene's Avatar
Carlene
Carlene is offline
Admom
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Silver Springs
Posts: 9,400
Received 188 Likes on 116 Posts
2003 2500 hd raerend problems

Please Note - this forum is for technical information and comparisons ONLY. Lets keep it that way.
 


Quick Reply: 2003 2500 hd raerend problems



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.