2003 2500 hd raerend problems
#1
2003 2500 hd raerend problems
Today i started coop at a local gmc chev pontiac dealer and i worked on a 2003 2500 hd. it has only 12 000km but already is having some pretty major rearend problems. we had to replace the clutchpacks and ring and pinion. I think this is rediculous as its almost brand new. This is just Testament to the crap quality of chev driveline's.
Last edited by inlineguy; 09-15-2003 at 04:42 PM.
#2
2003 2500 hd raerend problems
So you just started working there and you saw one truck with a problem. From that you extrapolate that chevy has crap drivelines? I owned 8 chevy trucks, the last one being an 01 2500HD 4x4 dmax/allison, before buying my 03 Excursion and I never had one driveline problem with any of them. I'd say ford has a worse track record than GM when it comes to drivelines.
#3
#4
2003 2500 hd raerend problems
Why didn't you say that in your first post? 10 would maybe indicate some kind of problem but I'm sure you'd have said that in your first post to bolster your arguement if you'd known about it. If you didn't know about all 10 of them in the first place, it wouldn't really indicate "crap quality of chev drivelines". Something doesn't add up.
I follow some big GM forums and I rarely see posts about rearend problems.
I follow some big GM forums and I rarely see posts about rearend problems.
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10
#12
2003 2500 hd raerend problems
Are you not listening?
They hold up better in the real world too. I gave my example, and thats hard to beat, because in the end all cars end up in the junkyard, and when metal comes to metal, more gm rears go into the crusher and more 9"/8.8" rears go back on the market. They hold up better.
They hold up better in the real world too. I gave my example, and thats hard to beat, because in the end all cars end up in the junkyard, and when metal comes to metal, more gm rears go into the crusher and more 9"/8.8" rears go back on the market. They hold up better.
#13
2003 2500 hd raerend problems
Originally posted by mattsbox99
Are you not listening?
They hold up better in the real world too. I gave my example, and thats hard to beat, because in the end all cars end up in the junkyard, and when metal comes to metal, more gm rears go into the crusher and more 9"/8.8" rears go back on the market. They hold up better.
Are you not listening?
They hold up better in the real world too. I gave my example, and thats hard to beat, because in the end all cars end up in the junkyard, and when metal comes to metal, more gm rears go into the crusher and more 9"/8.8" rears go back on the market. They hold up better.
But the subject is "crap quality of GM drivelines" which has not been established.
In the first post, he only mentioned one bad rearend and extrapolates that into some trend. Then it magically turns into 10 (nice round number) in a month (he'd only been there 5 days) when I call him on it. So if I walked into my ford shop and saw them putting a tranny in a newer Super Duty, can I say that's a testament to how horrible the drivelines are on Fords?
Defects happen to every brand. Take a look at the 6.0 diesel page on this forum. Brand loyalty is okay. Brand blindness is another story.
#14
2003 2500 hd raerend problems
My dad worked for a Chevy dealer when the duracrap came out, EVERY one of the first ones they sold came back because IT COULD NOT TOW! They had no power. I just watched an episode of Trucks today where they dynoed a duramax, 195hp at the wheels and 350ish torque......... That's kinda weak if you ask me......... Also the fact the scrapyard save the Ford rears and pitches the GM ones indicates which there is a market for. And yes most of the new engines in our trucks are directly related to the nascar and indy car engines. This is where most of the newer engines start out is at the track. If they do well then they get passed on the consumer.