2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

Question of the Week: Standard 10-speed - Good or Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-14-2016, 04:55 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,433
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by onug
What's the final drive ratio for the existing 6 speed? I'm running at 1,600 rpm with the 3.55 rear at 60mph, so the 3.15 rear is going to be much lower. It seems like these engines are already lugging going down the highway, so I don't see there being that much of a MPG improvement.

I'll be the forum skeptic in this. There are no magic bullets left to increase mileage. If a 10-speed could increase mileage better than moving to an AL body, Ford would have poured the resources into it first. But all we got out of the AL change was a 1mpg increase. I've been wrong before and will be again (just watch)...hopefully I'm wrong here too
The 10 speed will have nearly identical top gear as the current 6 Speed.

The 10 speed will feature a granny 1st gear and 3 OD gears.

Is it a MPG improvement? Likely not, maybe .1mpg improvement.

Josh
 
  #17  
Old 05-14-2016, 05:05 PM
bgil's Avatar
bgil
bgil is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: camano island, wa
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GlueGuy
The more gears the better as far as I am concerned. I think we'd all be in CVTs by now if they could handle high power output.

It might mean they could narrow the power band for engines and save money somehow, but that is sort of grasping at straws.
I currently have a hemi 1500 with the 8 speed transmission, and I am here to tell you its a nice transmission and the f150 will benefit from the 10 speed. More gears make downshifts much smoother and the same happens for "just getting going". You don't even know what gears you are using. they are a great compliment to these high torque engines.

I think the hemi picked up about 1 mpg going to the new tranny, but drivability improved. Like someone mentioned, any additional mpg's are going to be in small increments.

I have driven a couple of 2.7 ecoboosts and really like the engine, and will probably buy one in 2018...with the 10 speed transmission.
 
  #18  
Old 05-15-2016, 01:16 PM
foozlemonster's Avatar
foozlemonster
foozlemonster is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the 5.0 would benefit from the 10 Speed more than the Eco.
 
  #19  
Old 05-15-2016, 09:51 PM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,244
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by GlueGuy
The more gears the better as far as I am concerned. I think we'd all be in CVTs by now if they could handle high power output.

It might mean they could narrow the power band for engines and save money somehow, but that is sort of grasping at straws.
JCB Fastrac tractors have a heavy duty CVT. So it might just be that it's expensive to get the durability in the compact size pickups need. Besides they need to make the feel of them better and not sloppy.

They work great on snowmobiles and go karts, just not cars yet.
 
  #20  
Old 05-15-2016, 10:56 PM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Frdtrkrul
JCB Fastrac tractors have a heavy duty CVT. So it might just be that it's expensive to get the durability in the compact size pickups need. Besides they need to make the feel of them better and not sloppy.

They work great on snowmobiles and go karts, just not cars yet.
I disagree, wholeheartedly. I had a Nissan Murano, as does my son, my brother, cousin, and close friend. The Nissan CVT is a marvelous transmission. When you say GO you'd better be hanging on.

On the other hand, when my wife was replacing here 2001 Subie 2 years ago she wanted another Subie, so we drove two different models of them. Both had CVT's and we were shocked at how sloppy they were. Hit the throttle and the R's jumped, but not the speed, which finally started climbing slowly. I was afraid to mention it to her as I knew she wanted a Subie, but she told me should couldn't stand that transmission.
 
  #21  
Old 05-16-2016, 06:43 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,430
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
I remember being given a CR-V as a loaner with a CVT last year and really liking it. But neither the CR-V nor the Murano are rated to pull anything close to what a modern pickup is, so whether or not that kind of design would hold up is in question. I'd be all for it if they could pull it off though.
 
  #22  
Old 05-16-2016, 07:06 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
My Murano was rated for 3500 lbs, towing. But, I never towed anything with it, so I don't know how it would have done.

Actually, we had a situation come up where we needed to take a large load of furniture from OK to DE, and looked at renting a U-Haul and towing it with the Murano. But, I wasn't comfortable doing that as the total weight of the furniture probable was 1,000 and an enclosed trailer large enough to take it might be 2,000, placing us very close to the limit. Instead, my wife suggested we take Dad's truck, and I jumped at the chance. It made it fine with nary a problem, and I got to drive the truck 3,500 miles.
 
  #23  
Old 05-16-2016, 10:53 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,069
Received 441 Likes on 323 Posts
I'm looking forward to it, because I like more gears when towing. I suspect the mileage gains will be small.
 
  #24  
Old 05-16-2016, 02:47 PM
David W Jones's Avatar
David W Jones
David W Jones is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Pleasant Grove, Alabama
Posts: 369
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Given equal engines and rear gears, the new 10 speed will eke a little mileage over the current 6, but not much. MFG's are reaching for the last little bit available and more efficiency around town is going to be the 10 speeds area.
I suspect the new 10 speed will really shine when put up against the EPA's city/hwy dyno....hard to beat a couple of big numbers on the window sticker.....even if you'll never see those numbers in real life.
 
  #25  
Old 05-19-2016, 10:36 AM
LSchicago2's Avatar
LSchicago2
LSchicago2 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,684
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by foozlemonster
I think the 5.0 would benefit from the 10 Speed more than the Eco.
I agree, and hope that happens soon. That is one of the features I'm waiting for. 5.0/10 speed.
 
  #26  
Old 05-25-2016, 01:22 AM
sky Cowboy's Avatar
sky Cowboy
sky Cowboy is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Western Shuswap
Posts: 21,080
Received 250 Likes on 177 Posts
Just more gears for it to hunt around through to find the one it likes.
I am happy with the 6 speed and see no need for it.
Not long ago we all did okay with 3 and 4 gears.....6 was like a wow moment.
10 seems silly.
 
  #27  
Old 05-25-2016, 07:33 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,430
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by sky Cowboy
Not long ago we all did okay with 3 and 4 gears.....6 was like a wow moment.
10 seems silly.
I don't know, "okay" wasn't a great term to describe the old boxes compared to the 6-speed. Our Transit has the base 3.7L V6 in front of the 6R80, and it's rated to pull 4,500 lbs. We towed the boat for about 150 miles last weekend, and can say that the old 4R70W or 4R100 wouldn't have worked, the first gear wouldn't have provided the torque multiplication to get 10,500 lbs of van, boat, and passengers up some of the hills in Stillwater.



The new 10-speed would do even better with it's wider ratio spread. I could see another 1,000 lbs of towing capacity for my application because of the greater ability to get the load moving.
 
  #28  
Old 05-25-2016, 08:35 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,069
Received 441 Likes on 323 Posts
Having towed the same trailer with a four speed and a six speed, I can say that the six speed was MUCH better. If they had an option for a 20-speed, I'd choose it.
 
  #29  
Old 05-25-2016, 09:21 AM
Tnriverside's Avatar
Tnriverside
Tnriverside is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a long steep driveway. Getting my travel trailer up the drive is my biggest concern when we head out loaded. I know the 3.5 EB would do a better job then my 2009 5.4. But add to that the lower gearing of the first gear of the new ten speed and it shoul be the best combination to get my load started up the drive. I am looking forward to a test drive.
 
  #30  
Old 05-25-2016, 09:30 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,069
Received 441 Likes on 323 Posts
If the driveway is pretty straight, 4Lo is a good option on the driveway.
 


Quick Reply: Question of the Week: Standard 10-speed - Good or Bad?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.