2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

CAR AND DRIVER'S 5.0 VS. 3.5 EB...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-03-2016, 09:35 AM
liquidlounge's Avatar
liquidlounge
liquidlounge is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 284
Received 24 Likes on 10 Posts
CAR AND DRIVER'S 5.0 VS. 3.5 EB...

Just got the my new issue of Car and Driver and they had a nice little comparo of 2 similarly equipped F150's; one with 3.5 Eco and the other with the 5.0 V-8. I don't have a link, so you will probably have to wait to read on line. The only real surprise was how much the EB dominated in towing performance. Everything else, including MPG's was pretty close. Surprisingly, they did pick the V-8 as the vehicle they would drive everyday unloaded because the writers thought the EB throttle seemed a little touchy. I came away with I would rather have the 3.5 EB over the V8 given its extra capability with no mileage penalty because I like to tow a pretty good load several times a year. If you don't tow heavy and want to save $650.00, it sounds like V8 might be your choice.
 
  #2  
Old 05-03-2016, 10:02 AM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,245
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
See that's the dilemma I'm kind of having. Only way I can get the truck in my configuration is with either the 5.0 or the 3.5EB since I need 4x4 crew cab 6.5' bed. It's kind of surprising that there isn't any mpg penalty going with either of these engines that much. Probably stay the same with the 10 speed later on.

On a quick off topic, anyone know who supplies the electronic locker for the F150 if it's like Eaton or someone else?
 
  #3  
Old 05-03-2016, 10:16 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,077
Received 454 Likes on 331 Posts
My experience is with the previous generation trucks, but I agree, for towing, the 3.5 EcoBoost is the best gas engine available from any manufacturer. It's amazingly effortless with a load behind it. It beats any gas V8.

That being said, it does drive "different", especially when unloaded. A lot of folks like the feel of a V8, and the sound, and that 5.0L is an excellent motor.
 
  #4  
Old 05-03-2016, 10:24 AM
GuyGene's Avatar
GuyGene
GuyGene is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Clay Country, GA, NE MS
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just your description is one of the best comparisons I've read, liquid! I'd about flip a coin to choose.
 
  #5  
Old 05-03-2016, 03:21 PM
liquidlounge's Avatar
liquidlounge
liquidlounge is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 284
Received 24 Likes on 10 Posts
The article also stated that the 5.0 (in the pick-up truck) wasn't long for this world. I know that the V8 is a sweetheart of a motor, but the 2.7 EB is competitive with it in power and capability and does surpass it by a decent amount in real world fuel economy. Although yet to be proven; I think that the 5.0 V8 would have a lower cost of ownership in the latter half of its service life than its higher tech EB brothers. If you want the V8, you better not wait too long
 
  #6  
Old 05-03-2016, 04:09 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,223
Received 1,231 Likes on 808 Posts
Originally Posted by liquidlounge
The article also stated that the 5.0 (in the pick-up truck) wasn't long for this world. I know that the V8 is a sweetheart of a motor, but the 2.7 EB is competitive with it in power and capability and does surpass it by a decent amount in real world fuel economy. Although yet to be proven; I think that the 5.0 V8 would have a lower cost of ownership in the latter half of its service life than its higher tech EB brothers. If you want the V8, you better not wait too long
Great thread starter sir, thanks for sharing. However, history has already debunked your theory on reliability. The 5.0 is a great motor and I'd proudly own one but the older models have had some serious issues as well as some 3.5's to boot. The 3.5L EB makes up 45% of all F-150 sales since 2011. Over 1,000,000 have been produced for F-150's to date. Pretty stout little engine.

Reps sent for the article.
 
  #7  
Old 05-04-2016, 05:20 AM
Excelerater's Avatar
Excelerater
Excelerater is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Old schoolers like me will opt for the 5.0,its got the power I want and sounds awsome
at WOT . I cant see any EB set up going for hundreds of thousands of miles without
a turbo parts failure or other ecoboost related gizmos kicking the bucket. V8s just need oil and gas and they go forever .
 
  #8  
Old 05-04-2016, 05:28 AM
Larietpsd's Avatar
Larietpsd
Larietpsd is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I would love see to see ford bump the 5.0 up a bit maybe 400hp-415-420 torque.
 
  #9  
Old 05-04-2016, 06:10 AM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,245
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Excelerater
Old schoolers like me will opt for the 5.0,its got the power I want and sounds awsome
at WOT . I cant see any EB set up going for hundreds of thousands of miles without
a turbo parts failure or other ecoboost related gizmos kicking the bucket. V8s just need oil and gas and they go forever .
There's a few over 200,000 and 300,000 miles. I'm more concerned about how parts handle over 10+ years. Miles doesn't mean crap, it's the actual age that really matters in my book and how it was maintained.
 
  #10  
Old 05-04-2016, 12:14 PM
Excelerater's Avatar
Excelerater
Excelerater is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Frdtrkrul
There's a few over 200,000 and 300,000 miles. I'm more concerned about how parts handle over 10+ years. Miles doesn't mean crap, it's the actual age that really matters in my book and how it was maintained.
good to know,most TD truck engines go loads of miles but need
turbos ,egrs and lots of other junk along the way
 
  #11  
Old 05-04-2016, 08:53 PM
Curt's05's Avatar
Curt's05
Curt's05 is offline
Wiser by FTE

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,826
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Excelerater
good to know,most TD truck engines go loads of miles but need
turbos ,egrs and lots of other junk along the way
Lots of plumbing, complicated and they are hotter under the hood, that's why i went with the V8
 
  #12  
Old 05-04-2016, 09:08 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,431
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
I'm very curious to see how things play out with the 5.0L. I used to think that the simpler design was a better long-term bet for reliability, but in the last six months we've seen a startling number of 5.0L engine failures. Very curious to see if this is an issue that was rectified in the last few model years or not.

Not trying to start a war here, just that things aren't always what they seem.
 
  #13  
Old 05-04-2016, 09:51 PM
gpm414's Avatar
gpm414
gpm414 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia River Gorge, OR
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I chose the 5.0 in my new 2016 F150 for different reasons. I bought a new F350 Superduty in '04 and after 12 years I've had my fill of turbos, EGR systems, oil coolers, and high tech injection systems. We no longer carry a big camper while towing a loaded cargo trailer, so a diesel isn't needed.

The F150 with the 5.0 will pull our small trailer and has great handling and a comfortable ride. Our hope is that the 5.0 will gives us long term reliability and easy maintenance. I know there are few certainties in life, but at this time we're thrilled with our new F150 and off to a great start and not looking back.
 
  #14  
Old 05-04-2016, 10:03 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,433
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
I'm very curious to see how things play out with the 5.0L. I used to think that the simpler design was a better long-term bet for reliability, but in the last six months we've seen a startling number of 5.0L engine failures. Very curious to see if this is an issue that was rectified in the last few model years or not.

Not trying to start a war here, just that things aren't always what they seem.
Startling number of 5.0 failures?

If anything it is the 2.7 that is seeing failures over at F150forums...

Josh
 
  #15  
Old 05-04-2016, 10:26 PM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,245
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
Startling number of 5.0 failures?

If anything it is the 2.7 that is seeing failures over at F150forums...

Josh
Just saw reports of shudder at low miles, failed oil pump at low miles...all during break in period on the 2.7L.

Kind of surprised how early this is happening but not considering its a clean slate design with a lot of new features for Ford. Hopefully these will be addressed...but considering timing chain issues are a problem up until 2015 on the 3.5L and several TSBs later to fix it, I won't hold my breath.
 


Quick Reply: CAR AND DRIVER'S 5.0 VS. 3.5 EB...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.