Modular V10 (6.8l)  

Replaced 05 v10 with Ram 6.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-12-2015, 12:49 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Replaced 05 v10 with Ram 6.4

Well I bit the bullet and bought new truck. It is a 2015 Ram 2500 ccsb 4x4. 6.4l "hemi". 4.10 gears. I did a pull this past weekend and it did very well. I towed our 32ft camper about an hour away. Camper weighs about 8500-9000. All in all a very stout combo. Truck does very well towing. Noticeable power improvement over the v10 and smooth delivery of power. It pulls steady through entire rpm range where my v10 would just make a lot of noise above 3k rpm. I guess that's 10 years newer for ya. Any ways I was gonna get another Ford but just liked the overall package of the ram better. I suspect someday I will be in another superduty again. It may be awhile though. Still got the 77 F 150 to haul firewood though. Just some food for thought for some people considering a new gasser.






 
  #2  
Old 10-12-2015, 03:49 PM
Diamnd1's Avatar
Diamnd1
Diamnd1 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 1,206
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts
Nice truck. Lots of advancement in every facet of automobiles in 10 Years. I would love to have a newer truck, but just cant seem to let go of one that has NO issues and is paid for. I just keep changing oil and driving it. Besides, new trucks are so stinkin expensive.
 
  #3  
Old 10-12-2015, 05:14 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Yeah I didn't want to but I didn't wanna put 4-5k into current truck either. So new one it is. I got 9ne project with the 77 I didn't want 2
 
  #4  
Old 10-13-2015, 08:43 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 298 Likes on 157 Posts
have fun with the Fiat
 
  #5  
Old 10-13-2015, 12:18 PM
ordually's Avatar
ordually
ordually is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have fun with the new ride.

I'm surprised with your V10 observations about running out of steam after 3K. My 3V pulls strong right up the HP peak at 4750 (the 3V is still making 400lb-ft at that RPM).

The Dodge (sorry, Ram) 6.4 specs are:
410hp @ 5,600, 429 lb-ft @ 4,000

So the 6.4 is making 381 lb-ft at 5600RPM. According to the numbers the 6.4 only makes more horsepower than the V10 above the V10's HP peak of 4750 (the same statement is true of the Ford 6.2L vs the 6.8L). But of course there's different transmissions and rear gears involved as well, so it's not totally that simple on the road.

I have to love that the V10 was a $600 option in 2005...$600 for 92 lb-ft and 62hp...a great bang for the buck.

Ord
 
  #6  
Old 10-13-2015, 03:57 PM
hodge5's Avatar
hodge5
hodge5 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: VA- Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 534
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by ordually
Have fun with the new ride.

I'm surprised with your V10 observations about running out of steam after 3K. My 3V pulls strong right up the HP peak at 4750 (the 3V is still making 400lb-ft at that RPM).

The Dodge (sorry, Ram) 6.4 specs are:
410hp @ 5,600, 429 lb-ft @ 4,000

So the 6.4 is making 381 lb-ft at 5600RPM. According to the numbers the 6.4 only makes more horsepower than the V10 above the V10's HP peak of 4750 (the same statement is true of the Ford 6.2L vs the 6.8L). But of course there's different transmissions and rear gears involved as well, so it's not totally that simple on the road.

I have to love that the V10 was a $600 option in 2005...$600 for 92 lb-ft and 62hp...a great bang for the buck.

Ord
The biggest difference is the management of that power- today's high tech auto's, compared to what was in his 05. Today's transmissions have changed the game.
 
  #7  
Old 10-13-2015, 06:02 PM
Budman1962's Avatar
Budman1962
Budman1962 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once Fiat took over Dodge the Quality went way up. Nice truck.
 
  #8  
Old 10-13-2015, 08:08 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
All I can say is my 05 v10 would not do much but make a lot of noise much above 3-3500 rpm. It most likely needed a tune up among other things. It only had 89000 miles on it. Yeah it may be a Fiat/Chrysler pickup. To be honest I have owned other Chrysler products. I have had nothing but good luck with them. I never had any problems with any Ford products I have had over the years either. My view point is this. The 2017 superduty is the truck Ford should have came out with 3 or 4 years ago. The boxed frame will help tons in towing comfort I can attest to that already. Also the coil springs are very nice too. Softer with no load and stiffen up when you load it down. I know Ford will most likely never put rear coils on their F250 but you never know. I wasn't going to spend my precious money on a brand new truck that would give me the same towing experience a 10 year old truck did. Being frame and suspension wise. Hell at least it's not a chevy with ifs and from what felt like to me a turd of 6.0l gas v8. Anyways I am an equal opportunity truck owner. I buy what I feel will do me the best job. It so happened to be ram this time. Down the road it could be Ford again. I figured I would give some info out there for some people who might be looking for a new gasser in the future. I will tell you this it's not a easy choice these days. The big three are all bringing very good trucks to the table. I hope this doesn't sound like a rant. The fingers just got carried away. Time for a beer!
 
  #9  
Old 10-13-2015, 08:43 PM
GHeTTo JOe's Avatar
GHeTTo JOe
GHeTTo JOe is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 50450 IOWA
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so you didnt get the air suspension ? that would be the one thing that would sway me to a ram is air ride. the fords did change the rear leafs to be longer in 2008 so its not the same as your old 05
 
  #10  
Old 10-13-2015, 11:55 PM
twigsV10's Avatar
twigsV10
twigsV10 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Honestly that's a nice looking truck and hope it treats you well, I've been rather interested in the 6.4 vs 6.2 comparison and a 6.4 vs 6.8 is also interesting to me.
I am a little bit surprised that you're 05 6.8 was lacking in power above 3k, my 06 pulls impressively well below 3k rpm and very rarely need to go above that but if you put the hammer down and let it rev it really goes when it gets around 4/5k rpm! And that's with towing a really hevy trailer.
 
  #11  
Old 10-14-2015, 02:05 AM
Bently_Coop's Avatar
Bently_Coop
Bently_Coop is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent Station, WA
Posts: 7,457
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Congratulations on the new truck. I hope it serves you well.

Ram's quality is supposed to have really picked up lately.
 
  #12  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:18 AM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
No I did not opt for air ride. I wanted to keep it simple as possible. If I am correct. I believe you only get air bags with no coil support like in a semi. I know an air bag failure would be minimal but I didn't feel I needed the extra cost or worry of another system.
 
  #13  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:28 AM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by twigsV10
Honestly that's a nice looking truck and hope it treats you well, I've been rather interested in the 6.4 vs 6.2 comparison and a 6.4 vs 6.8 is also interesting to me.
I am a little bit surprised that you're 05 6.8 was lacking in power above 3k, my 06 pulls impressively well below 3k rpm and very rarely need to go above that but if you put the hammer down and let it rev it really goes when it gets around 4/5k rpm! And that's with towing a really hevy trailer.
That's when I noticed the lack of power the most was in the high rpm. Down around 2500 it was good. But once revved out it didn't have that pull more of just revving noise. Who knows maybe it had a transmission issue I didn't know about and was slipping a bit. I tried new fuel filter but didn't help.
 
  #14  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:38 PM
KellyfromVA's Avatar
KellyfromVA
KellyfromVA is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Krewat
have fun with the Fiat
A Chrysler-Fiat product made in Mexico.
 
  #15  
Old 10-14-2015, 08:31 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by KellyfromVA
A Chrysler-Fiat product made in Mexico.
Yep you're right. I could have purchased a 6.7 powerstroke that's made in Mexico also. And they still get close to 9k for that Mexico built diesel. Along with many other parts. The truck itself assembled in Kentucky though. We all could argue all day about build quality. I honestly see no difference. Whether it's an American who doesn't appreciate his job or a Hispanic who doesn't appreciate there job. It all comes down to the worker whether they take pride in their work. Frankly I have seen a lot of Americans who don't give a crap about their workmanship. So I'll take a truck a truck assembled anywhere as long as it's put together with some pride for God's sake.
 


Quick Reply: Replaced 05 v10 with Ram 6.4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.