1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Opinions needed: Dorothy's ride height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-05-2015, 07:37 AM
Bluey Zedoff's Avatar
Bluey Zedoff
Bluey Zedoff is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Shellharbour, NSW
Posts: 1,115
Received 78 Likes on 39 Posts
Opinions needed: Dorothy's ride height

Guys. First photo of Dorothy with the new Jag front in it.
Still has original rear springs as far as I can tell.
What do you reckon? Needs to come down a fair bit or leave as is?

The Mustang II front that was in it before definitely had it lower to the ground, giving it a pronounced rake (which I liked) but legally was probably a no-no.
At least now the ride is about even.



Thoughts, gents?
I would like to do something to the rear to bring it down as it does look a bit agricultural. Ideas???
 
  #2  
Old 08-05-2015, 10:00 AM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
52 Merc is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burbank, WA
Posts: 13,951
Received 2,468 Likes on 1,408 Posts
I'd vote for both ends down an inch or two. You could trim the front coils, but I have no idea how much cut makes how much lowering on jag springs (half coil?). Rear can come down with reversed eye springs or extended hangers, or both.
 
  #3  
Old 08-05-2015, 10:02 AM
drptop70ss's Avatar
drptop70ss
drptop70ss is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: in a barn
Posts: 2,577
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
I think it looks fine, maybe drop it an inch or two on both ends but I am not a big fan is the super dumped look.
Are the front upper control arms off their bump stops? In my 51 #2 build with the stock XJ6 springs my uppers are just touching but I still have to add the front sheet metal and fluids. On my truck #1 build I actually cut one coil off the front springs to lower it even more.
 
  #4  
Old 08-05-2015, 10:20 AM
emay's Avatar
emay
emay is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hampshire, IL
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like em low - but I think if you just closed up that fender gap to the top of the tire it would do a ton for the visual appeal.
 
  #5  
Old 08-05-2015, 10:51 AM
49f3dls's Avatar
49f3dls
49f3dls is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Southern SC.
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If the front end tie rods are in the proper place/angle to ground I would leave that alone. If you have original springs in rear - pull one or two - it should lower it a bit and give a better ride. At least that is what I was told to do on my F3 - but I had a lot more springs that you do. have fun - it really looks good.
 
  #6  
Old 08-05-2015, 12:25 PM
ImSoQuazy's Avatar
ImSoQuazy
ImSoQuazy is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Visalia
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good.
I now have a very good visual of what mine is going to turn out like.
But, I am of the no rake school. Prefer my truck level on all fours and hiding the inner fender gaps.
Thank you for the visual.
Paul
 
  #7  
Old 08-05-2015, 03:51 PM
Bluey Zedoff's Avatar
Bluey Zedoff
Bluey Zedoff is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Shellharbour, NSW
Posts: 1,115
Received 78 Likes on 39 Posts
Thanks guys. Bumpstops are not quite touching. Few more things to bolt up, but not much.
Glad you think it looks ok as is, as I was wondering how it was gonna turn out. I think I agree, just a couple of inches lower should be sweet.
Cheers gents.
Peter
 
  #8  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:24 PM
Bluey Zedoff's Avatar
Bluey Zedoff
Bluey Zedoff is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Shellharbour, NSW
Posts: 1,115
Received 78 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by ImSoQuazy
Looks good.
I now have a very good visual of what mine is going to turn out like.
But, I am of the no rake school. Prefer my truck level on all fours and hiding the inner fender gaps.
Thank you for the visual.
Paul
Glad to help out, Paul. I think you asked me ages ago to show you how it might look. We finally got there, mate.
 
  #9  
Old 08-05-2015, 06:15 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56
Aus56 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello Peter, looking good, down to the top of the tires would look great I reckon. What wheels and tyres are you running and sizes. I like the thin white line tyres.
 
  #10  
Old 08-05-2015, 09:02 PM
Bluey Zedoff's Avatar
Bluey Zedoff
Bluey Zedoff is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Shellharbour, NSW
Posts: 1,115
Received 78 Likes on 39 Posts
Hi Nev. Yep. A couple of inches or so should do wonders I reckon. Not bad as is, tho. Can't remember how the springs are setup underneath the old girl. Will have to check on the weekend. Weekdays for me are a write-off. Leave at 5.30am, home at 8.45 pm. Gettin tired of using a torch every time I need to do something on the truck,. Okay, rant over.
These wheels are 7's. American Racing Torque Thruster II's. Picked them up cheaply from a guy who had them on his '57 Chevy. The tyres are new Coopers, 235's. The guy imported them from the USA, he says. I am not sure of their local availability.
I think the 7's are a bit small. Would have preferred 8's, but I don't think they look too bad. They don't rub, anyway. This photo is actually the first time I have seen the wheels on the truck.



I had to get the hubs machined to accommodate the Jag. $50 each at a local wheel shop. The Jag has the same Chevy bolt pattern anyway, and the rear end is a GM 10 bolt, so that made things easier.
 
  #11  
Old 08-05-2015, 10:09 PM
41505379's Avatar
41505379
41505379 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wildwood, Mo
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Height looks good to me, but then I'm kind of an agriculture guy. Patrick
 
  #12  
Old 08-05-2015, 10:55 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56
Aus56 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info Peter, that is a nice looking combo.


It does look good at that height, but I have always liked lowered cars.
 
  #13  
Old 08-06-2015, 08:48 AM
Don Vito's Avatar
Don Vito
Don Vito is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd drop it 2 in front and 2 in back, it'd still have a slight rake to it. I like them low.
 
  #14  
Old 08-06-2015, 08:56 AM
topmoo's Avatar
topmoo
topmoo is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I like it as is, a slight downward tilt is good. Are you going to carry anything heavy at all?
 
  #15  
Old 08-06-2015, 10:34 AM
ZOOT's Avatar
ZOOT
ZOOT is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Those wheels look great. Since you asked, I'd suggest as others have, a couple of inches down would look better to me. I guess I prefer a rake, but it has it's problems like speed bumps and the end of driveways. I have a Mustang front and I'm very happy with the stance of mine. I have no idea how to lower your set up, but I thought cutting coils was a no no. Here's mine.
 


Quick Reply: Opinions needed: Dorothy's ride height



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM.