Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

speed density roller 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-27-2015, 01:46 AM
fordboy97's Avatar
fordboy97
fordboy97 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
speed density roller 5.0

My truck is a '90 f150 2wd regular cab 8 foot bed. I recently installed a remanufactured '94-up f150 roller 5.0. It has a few mods such as long tubes, timing bump, msd ignition, etc. It has the original AOD trans. I have a few q's for you guys concerning performance. Keep in mind this truck is a dd.

I am currently saving up to get my transmission rebuilt (or buy a monster transmission) and shortly after installing 4.10 gears in the rear. My question here is would it be worth it to go with a higher stall torque converter (2300-2500 rpm) to help with off the line power? Or stick with the stock stall speed?

Next question is about the cam. From research I have learned that this engine already has a decent camshaft and when paired with 1.7 rr's is very close to the specs of the off the shelf speed density friendly cams. I currently have the stock rocker arms, would it be worth the money to swap to the 1.7's? Or should I go with an aftermarket camshaft?
 
  #2  
Old 03-27-2015, 09:31 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,966
Likes: 0
Received 984 Likes on 776 Posts
Once you get 4.10 gears you won't need a high stall converter IMO, it would also impact fuel milage. A longer duration cam will push peak power up into higher rpms and soften low rpm power which will also impact fuel milage, but 1.7 rockers will boost the powerband you have now.
 
  #3  
Old 03-27-2015, 10:18 AM
fordboy97's Avatar
fordboy97
fordboy97 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok cool. I think I'm gonna go with these rockers http://m.summitracing.com/parts/crn-44746-16
 
  #4  
Old 03-27-2015, 07:54 PM
fordboy97's Avatar
fordboy97
fordboy97 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another question... my truck has way more power when the engine is cool, or right before it reaches operating temp. Its nice and snappy off the line and then when it warms up sometimes it feels kind of doggy. Is this due to the engine just being colder or is it something to do with the enrichment cycle at cold startup?
 
  #5  
Old 03-27-2015, 10:10 PM
impish's Avatar
impish
impish is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When cold, PCM (computer) ignores emissions, richens up mix to ensure engine does not stall, like they did in the old days.


So, yes, it might just be snappier when cold. impish
 
  #6  
Old 03-27-2015, 10:21 PM
fordboy97's Avatar
fordboy97
fordboy97 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if there is a way to keep it this way..or would that negatively effect mpg?
 
  #7  
Old 03-28-2015, 09:36 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,966
Likes: 0
Received 984 Likes on 776 Posts
If you unplug a sensor it will stay in open loop but you can expect fuel milage to go right in the tank.
 
  #8  
Old 03-28-2015, 09:44 AM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,070
Received 135 Likes on 114 Posts
the less time you spend in open loop the better for mpg. you can get resistors for the IAT to make the engine think its cold all the time, its ghetto and results vary wildly, but it is noticeable sometimes. that way you can run closed loop but the computer always thinks its cold so itll richen a little, or perhaps not at all. all depends on conditions.
 
  #9  
Old 03-28-2015, 11:40 AM
fordboy97's Avatar
fordboy97
fordboy97 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I could try unplugging the sensor (the one below the throttle body) just for the heck of it. Just to see what happens

Edit: is this the iat sensor?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rb2
Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide & Water/Methanol Injection
4
07-06-2014 11:49 AM
USMC0351fordtruckin
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
03-12-2011 02:51 PM
Fordenthusiasts
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
26
12-11-2008 10:42 PM
jav409
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
8
10-31-2005 01:18 PM
Justin89
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
20
07-07-2002 11:50 PM



Quick Reply: speed density roller 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.