Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4410 lb front end ? 92 F250

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 12-12-2014, 09:55 AM
we287gn's Avatar
we287gn
we287gn is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Golden Helmet
My '92 SCLB 7.3 idi has the 4410lb dana 50 front end, i'll post a picture of the door jam sticker when I get home
Just curious how many leafs do you have up front and what is your spring code?
 
  #17  
Old 12-12-2014, 11:34 AM
FordxFour's Avatar
FordxFour
FordxFour is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Apex, N.C.
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ford has clearly de-rated the front ends of these trucks. Look at the front tire pressures compared to the rear.

Here are mine FYI...

Spring Code 75F
Rear GAWR 6084....80psi
Front GAWR 3850...44psi
GVWR 8600
 
  #18  
Old 12-12-2014, 11:37 AM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad
Isn't it funny.

The total axle GVWs is 10,494lbs but the trucks GVW is only 8800lbs
Worse than that, on my '85 F-250HD (351W, 4 spd manual, 3.54 gears) the GVWR was something like 8,600 lbs but the GCWR was something like 7,600 lbs. So I guess I could only load the truck to it's max if I was towing a trailer that weighed -1000 lbs (maybe a trailer full of hot air???)
 
  #19  
Old 12-12-2014, 12:58 PM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by we287gn
Just curious how many leafs do you have up front and what is your spring code?
ALL F250s/F350s of this era came with only 2 leafs. Any more and it was added
 
  #20  
Old 12-12-2014, 01:09 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
my '85 F-250HD (351W, 4 spd manual, 3.54 gears) the GVWR was something like 8,600 lbs but the GCWR was something like 7,600 lbs.
lol.what? id just guess your manual/literature was misprinted.
 
  #21  
Old 12-12-2014, 04:18 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT
lol.what? id just guess your manual/literature was misprinted.
It was the combination of the 3.54 gears and manual trans. Both really hurt the GCWR. An auto with the 3.54s would have given me 10,000 lbs. I just never really worried too much about GCWR when I owned that truck.
 
  #22  
Old 12-12-2014, 04:20 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
i understand how a manual trans is less than an auto,and the 3.55 would be lower than the 4.10 option as well.however the trucks combined rating can't be less than it's weight weighting.
 
  #23  
Old 12-12-2014, 04:25 PM
FordxFour's Avatar
FordxFour
FordxFour is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Apex, N.C.
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT
i understand how a manual trans is less than an auto,and the 3.55 would be lower than the 4.10 option as well.however the trucks combined rating can't be less than it's weight weighting.
LOL...maybe the engineers came up with these figures by hooking the trailer to the front of the truck.
 
  #24  
Old 12-12-2014, 05:04 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT
i understand how a manual trans is less than an auto,and the 3.55 would be lower than the 4.10 option as well.however the trucks combined rating can't be less than it's weight weighting.
I figured the GVWR was based on the axles, springs and frame, and the GCWR was based on the engine, trans and gear ratio. Then they just plugged in the inputs and out came the answer. It didn't have to make sense, it was RIGHT.

Besides, they had incentive to offer the higher GVWR then because if it was over 8400 lbs they didn't need the catalytic converter.
 
  #25  
Old 12-12-2014, 05:13 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
yeah but it's still got to move the weight of 8600 lbs.what the truck can weigh.it's curb + payload.
you can't say it's combined weight,what the trucks curb + payload + trailer and it's payload needs to weigh less than the 8600 lbs.
to not be able to tow,they need to at least say the combined is 8600lbs cus it's got to be built to move this much weight no matter what.
does anyone have the '85 literature? are you just messing with us?
(my old man used to use that exact combo to tow a 34' 5ver for many years.his was an '84.he bought her brand new in '83.no wait,i remember his had the 4.10's though.)
 
  #26  
Old 12-12-2014, 06:26 PM
250FOREVER's Avatar
250FOREVER
250FOREVER is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: N E Pa.
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a friend that ordered a F 550 a few years ago , when it got to the dealers he had them send it out to a spring shop for additional springs , an additional sticker was added with raised rating . A lot of documentation from Ford and Spicer was necessary , but my point is brakes were part of this equation .
 
  #27  
Old 12-12-2014, 10:13 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT
yeah but it's still got to move the weight of 8600 lbs.what the truck can weigh.it's curb + payload.
you can't say it's combined weight,what the trucks curb + payload + trailer and it's payload needs to weigh less than the 8600 lbs.
to not be able to tow,they need to at least say the combined is 8600lbs cus it's got to be built to move this much weight no matter what.
does anyone have the '85 literature? are you just messing with us?
(my old man used to use that exact combo to tow a 34' 5ver for many years.his was an '84.he bought her brand new in '83.no wait,i remember his had the 4.10's though.)
I'm not messing with you. And yes, I understand that Gross Vehicle Weight Rating means truck + payload and that Gross Combined Weight Rating means truck + payload + total trailer weight = GVW + total trailer weight. It's saying that the truck wasn't rated to move as much as it was rated to carry. I'm not saying it makes any sense. It sounded as stupid to me when I read it back in late '84 when I got the truck as it sounds to you now. But it is what I read. And sorry, no, I don't still have any of the manuals or the door sticker or anything. I sold that truck 16 years ago.

I never towed all that much with it, and rarely hauled HEAVY loads. I put about 4K of pressure-treated lumber in the bed once, that was probably the only time I was over the GVWR. It rode pretty mushy with that load. And I towed my Model A and my CJ5 with it, maybe 4500 lbs max trailer weight. It handled that fine, even stopping it with no trailer brakes. But acceleration with about 180 hp and 3.54 gears was not exactly exhilarating.
 
  #28  
Old 12-12-2014, 10:23 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
she sure wasn't the 460/e40d/4.10 combo hey?
 
  #29  
Old 12-12-2014, 10:30 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT
she sure wasn't the 460/e40d/4.10 combo hey?
No, but the thing is, the carbed 351 / NP235 / 3.54 gears performed satisfactorily as far as I was concerned. Sure my current truck can spin a tire when starting around a corner carrying my slide-in camper. But I'd give ability that up in a heartbeat if I could get 15 mpg instead of 10 (not that I got 15 mpg with the '85...)
 
  #30  
Old 12-14-2014, 06:57 PM
we287gn's Avatar
we287gn
we287gn is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad
If anything since the diesel weighs so much, putting a plow on would go over the ratings.

All I know is my 97 F250 power stoke Crewcab Short bed152" WB(3" shorter than your truck 155" WB) has a 4800b rated front axle
I didn't realize there was such thing as a crew cab short bed ..very interesting ...
Are they rare?? I did a quick search and came up with pics of beds with two tanks... was there two fuel doors on the short beds for the crew cabs?
 


Quick Reply: 4410 lb front end ? 92 F250



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.