Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Solid axle swap vs. stock TTB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-02-2014, 01:35 PM
88F15095F150's Avatar
88F15095F150
88F15095F150 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Solid axle swap vs. stock TTB

Hey guys, So I've been doing some hard thinking and researching the past few weeks about solid axle swaps and the stock TTB that comes in the 80-96 4x4s.
I purchased a Dana 44 out of a 79 F150 a few months ago with the intent to swap it into the 88 F150 which I currently own, which all of you know is equipped with the TTB stock. My question is, are they really that bad? I've used this truck for wood hauling and other off road activities and it had always performed well. What I'm asking is what is so bad about it and is really worth it to swap in the Solid Dana 44? from what I've read it is a pretty involved process. Any feedback would be much appreciated. Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 10-02-2014, 02:34 PM
Redneckfordf2502002's Avatar
Redneckfordf2502002
Redneckfordf2502002 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Backwoods of Snowflake AZ
Posts: 10,080
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
As far as I understand unless this truck is seeing offroading everyday and/or it is running over 35s then it isn't worth putting a SA under the truck. Personally I would say stay with a ttb as it sounds like you are running 31s or 235s and don't use it everyday offroading.
Trav
 
  #3  
Old 10-02-2014, 02:40 PM
88F15095F150's Avatar
88F15095F150
88F15095F150 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckfordf2502002
As far as I understand unless this truck is seeing offroading everyday and/or it is running over 35s then it isn't worth putting a SA under the truck. Personally I would say stay with a ttb as it sounds like you are running 31s or 235s and don't use it everyday offroading.
Trav
You are 100% correct. I have 31s on it now, and I everytime I use it off road it performs flawlessly. I am very pleased with these trucks, very durable and capable off road! I suppose the most logical step would be to add a locker to at least the rear axle. Thanks for input redneckford!
 
  #4  
Old 10-02-2014, 03:07 PM
Redneckfordf2502002's Avatar
Redneckfordf2502002
Redneckfordf2502002 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Backwoods of Snowflake AZ
Posts: 10,080
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have been told to only have a locker in the rear as these trucks act funny in the mud and snow when their is a locker up front.


Does the truck have LS (limited slip) or not?
If it has LS then I would say that is good enough. I had a truck that I took offroad all the time and used as a wood truck and never had a problem with it getting stuck or whatever (most of the time I was in 2wd too) and all I had was a stock LS and 31s. That truck was an 86 F150 4x4 I now have a 88 F150 4x4 and 90 F150 4x4 same set up and I plan to do light offroading and run 31s (at the most 33s) but no out in the woods with this one.
Trav
 
  #5  
Old 10-02-2014, 04:09 PM
GoinBoarding's Avatar
GoinBoarding
GoinBoarding is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Laramie, WY
Posts: 3,103
Received 161 Likes on 129 Posts
TTB 44 is strong enough for 33's, 35 is the suggested maximum.
The issues with them are more related to maintenance, as in, they require it. Replacing radius arm bushings and axle pivot bushings is something I have had to do more than I would like. Another issue is the change in camber that occurs during the cycling of the suspension (also when loaded). The above leads to funky tire wear patterns, but when maintained and properly aligned they're fine.
 
  #6  
Old 10-02-2014, 04:18 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
A coil-sprung TTB (like in an F-150) generally rides and handles as well, or better, than a solid axle. That is not true of leaf-spring TTBs (F-250s and earlier F-350s).

Both the D44 TTB and D50 TTB have strength pretty comparable to a solid Dana 44 (the D50 TTB is probably a little stronger in some ways). A D60 could be considered a reasonable upgrade if you're going with big tires or will beat on it, but a solid D44 doesn't really get you any more strength.

It's easier to get alignment screwed up on a TTB (especially with a lift), so they can be tire eaters. But with a little care that's not much of an issue either.

There are mixed opinions on this, but in my experience, none of the 4 TTBs I've had were ever vibration-free, while all 5 of the solid front axles I've owned have been smooth. But even in my experience, only one of the TTBs was objectionable.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whipple_ryan
Offroad & 4x4
9
03-11-2009 04:37 PM
jokerforever
Offroad & 4x4
7
11-17-2007 06:36 PM
tkclary
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
8
12-27-2006 04:36 PM
1970Custom
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
6
09-30-2004 11:22 PM



Quick Reply: Solid axle swap vs. stock TTB



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.