Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L) 3.5L Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6 and 2.0L I4 EcoBoost Engines

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2012, 07:53 PM
Jag Red 54's Avatar
Jag Red 54 Jag Red 54 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,260
Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Does anybody Have a 2.0 in an Explorer?

I have heard many people hypothesize that the 2.0 will be too small for the Explorer. However, for around town driving with no towing, I wonder if it might be fine. Any actual owners out there willing to share your impressions? jag
__________________
54 F100
55 Fairlane
68 F100
55 Crown Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2012, 07:07 AM
ltatkinson's Avatar
ltatkinson ltatkinson is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 182
ltatkinson is starting off with a positive reputation.
We have it in a Taurus and could not be happier. It is not a small car, im not sure of the weight differance between the Taurus and Explorer but I think it would be ok. Probably not what we would call fast but definitely sufficent.

Tim
__________________
2013 F150 Lariat Crew Cab, 4X4, Ecoboost, 3.55 gears, Bak Roller X tonneau cover, BFG All Terrain 285x55x20.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2012, 08:44 AM
Jag Red 54's Avatar
Jag Red 54 Jag Red 54 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,260
Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Thanks, that's good to know. Did you pay a premium price to get the 2.0? Jag
__________________
54 F100
55 Fairlane
68 F100
55 Crown Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2012, 08:19 AM
ltatkinson's Avatar
ltatkinson ltatkinson is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 182
ltatkinson is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yes I just checked and it was a $995 option. We have about 400 miles on it now. Just going by the car and the wife doesnt really do much highway driving. We are getting 26.7 miles per gallon. For 99% city driving we are very happy. I drove it last night with friends and my buddy didnt believe it was a 4 cylinder even with a turbo. Again very happy.

Tim
__________________
2013 F150 Lariat Crew Cab, 4X4, Ecoboost, 3.55 gears, Bak Roller X tonneau cover, BFG All Terrain 285x55x20.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2012, 08:51 AM
LSchicago2's Avatar
LSchicago2 LSchicago2 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,404
LSchicago2 has a great reputation on FTE.LSchicago2 has a great reputation on FTE.LSchicago2 has a great reputation on FTE.LSchicago2 has a great reputation on FTE.
My wife has a 2.0 in an Escape, and we are very happy with that too. But, you really should drive the Explorer with the 2.0. That weighs 1,000 pounds more than the Escape, so it will be a different feeling. I think for commuting it would be fine.
__________________
2011 F550 XL V10 Rollback & 2013 F150 RCSB STX 5.0. Former trucks: 09 F550 Lariat S/C V10 4x4, 05 F450 S/C 6.0 F450 & 03 F450 V10 tow trucks. Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?...81&ref=profile
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 11:01 AM
Jag Red 54's Avatar
Jag Red 54 Jag Red 54 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,260
Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Well, we went down and test drove a base unit Explorer on Friday. It had the 6 cylinder in it with most of the same options as its expensive brother the XLT. We found the ride to be rougher than expected and the seats were not comfortable. We sat in the XLT with the leather seats and they were the same; realitively hard. So, my wife has erased the Explorer from her list. Jag
__________________
54 F100
55 Fairlane
68 F100
55 Crown Victoria
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 11:01 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup