Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

92 f150 5.8 performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-13-2012, 05:38 PM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
92 f150 5.8 performance

Hey, so I'm new to this forum. I have a 92 F-150 with a 5.8L efi engine, automatic transmission. I have on it headers, true dual, no cats, a k&n air filter, and a mild cam. I've been told its a speed density. I was wondering what else I can do to get more performance while keeping her NA. Maybe a set of heads? The performance I'm looking for is speed! I don't haul stuff nor tow and its not 4x4. Also, should I lower the suspension? I have boss 22" rims as well.
 
  #2  
Old 09-13-2012, 07:51 PM
burnout400m's Avatar
burnout400m
burnout400m is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,179
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lower suspension will help in the corners and look nicer on a 2wd.

Look at the "6-liter" tune up and head work. With a cam and the heads a larger throttle body MAY help and possibly an aftermarket upper and lower intake manifold. Throttle body spacers and chips on these trucks won't do anything so don't throw money away on those. The only other thing I can think of is a lower gear set in the rear end for better acceleration. Most of my HP knowledge is for stock engines so I don't know how much good the TB and intake will really help.
 
  #3  
Old 09-13-2012, 08:08 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,586
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
Define "mild" cam? What are your horsepower/torque goals? The factory E7 heads will get you to the 300 FWHP range with some work and a better intake. As soon as you start down that path you will find the factory 5.8L intake is useless.

The Gen 1 Lightnings were factory rated at ~245 FWHP. They had GT40 intakes and heads as well as factory shorty headers. With a little work, mainly a better cam and a tune, the Gen 1 guys are running 300+ FWHP.

A Lightning upper and lower intake, AFR/Trickflow heads and a decent Speed Density friendly cam will take you far in your quest. The biggest limiting factor is finding someone who can tune a Speed Density truck. A factory tune, even if it is MAF, will not allow you to realize a full value return on your investment of "go-fast" parts IMHO.
 
  #4  
Old 09-13-2012, 08:15 PM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't pu in the cam. The person I bought it off of purchased it new in 92 and he put it in there. I trust his work, he was a head mechanic at a ford dealership for years. So I'm not sure on the brand but you can hear it and feel it when you get to higher rpm's. My goals are around 350-400 hp and lb./ft torque. I don't want to go overboard. I have thought of getting a positive drive supercharger from a ford lightning though. She's already pretty quick, but I love power.
 
  #5  
Old 09-13-2012, 08:19 PM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know if this helps, but the truck has 150k on it but the engine was rebuilt at 99k.
 
  #6  
Old 09-13-2012, 09:07 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,586
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
Originally Posted by 92f150powell
I didn't pu in the cam. The person I bought it off of purchased it new in 92 and he put it in there. I trust his work, he was a head mechanic at a ford dealership for years. So I'm not sure on the brand but you can hear it and feel it when you get to higher rpm's. My goals are around 350-400 hp and lb./ft torque. I don't want to go overboard. I have thought of getting a positive drive supercharger from a ford lightning though. She's already pretty quick, but I love power.

You are not going to hit those goals with E7 heads and factory 5.8L intake. You will need a 5.8L Lightning intake or aftermarket and better heads. For the price of used GT40 heads and clean up work I would go with aftermarket heads. Then you have to overcome the Speed Density engine control. A blower from a Gen 2 Lightning is going to be a custom fit. Two completely different engines.
 
  #7  
Old 09-13-2012, 09:31 PM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't the gen 1 lightnings have a charger?
 
  #8  
Old 09-13-2012, 09:44 PM
Evan_P's Avatar
Evan_P
Evan_P is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,490
Received 106 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by 92f150powell
Didn't the gen 1 lightnings have a charger?
Not from the factory. Companies used to make supercharges for the 5.8, but stopped years ago... Your best bet for 400hp is going to be a 393 or 408 stroker...
 
  #9  
Old 09-13-2012, 09:55 PM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh ok. I wasn't aware of that. The heads sounds like a great idea. What about upgrading the cam. What would be a good fit? Any gains without changing the engine is what I'm after.
 
  #10  
Old 09-13-2012, 09:57 PM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a centrifugal supercharger that is still made for that engine?
 
  #11  
Old 09-14-2012, 04:22 AM
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
UNTAMND is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 3,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Unless you find a used supercharger kit (last used one I bought was almost $2000) it will run you quite a bit.
Forced induction will almost require aftermarket tuning. The older kits had an MSD 6-btm and an fmu for timing and fuel, but were limited on adjustability.

I really think what you're looking for is fast and fun.
I'd suggest
392/393 "economy" stroker kit. This kit uses stock rods and 302 pistons, and a crank that was designed for those two parts. You can usually get it balanced on eBay for 900-1200 bucks I think. It's good for 500hp or so.
Aluminum heads. Your goal of 400+ is very tricky with iron heads unless you boost it. Most any alum head will work. Procomp is cheap, but beware that people have had a bit of trouble with the older ones. Edelbrock, afr, or any other brand name is preferred, but you can get a cheap set for 500 complete on eBay.
Roller rockers (usually nessisary with aftermarket heads)
Roller cam. I have just been talking with conanski about good roller cams for efi and there are a couple that are pretty healthy.
Intake is restrictive on a 351. The small oval ports were dumb on fords part. Any mustang style intake and tb will be a great upgrade and an easy swap.

Lots of info on this forum. Just start reading.
 
  #12  
Old 09-14-2012, 08:03 AM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you very much for everyones input. I appreciate it! I got a lot of good knowledge.
 
  #13  
Old 09-14-2012, 08:07 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 966 Likes on 764 Posts
Without making any changes to the motor forced induction is the only option that will get you close to your goals. If the cam in the motor now is anything half decent the heads and intake are already restricting the engine, but the next step up is gonna be expensive because it will require larger injectors and tuning so even at $2000-$3000 a blower kit is gonna be cheaper to do.
 
  #14  
Old 09-14-2012, 08:19 AM
92f150powell's Avatar
92f150powell
92f150powell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I think my next step will definitely be the heads and intake. Thanks again!
 
  #15  
Old 09-14-2012, 08:24 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 966 Likes on 764 Posts
Originally Posted by 92f150powell
Well, I think my next step will definitely be the heads and intake.
But dont forget bigger injectors, a larger capacity fuel pump, and a tuner.
 


Quick Reply: 92 f150 5.8 performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.