Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

EB mileage levels just like 7.3 PSD levels ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-07-2011, 10:47 AM
jeffdoerr's Avatar
jeffdoerr
jeffdoerr is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MI -- farmboy
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
EB mileage levels just like 7.3 PSD levels ?

Cryptic title. I know.

Seems from what I have been reading and experiencing, there are 2 distinct levels of mileage on the ecoboost trucks, good and bad. Just like what I encountered when I had my 2000 F350 7.3 truck. You either got poor or good and there was no between figures. Some trucks got 13 mpg, some got 18mpg. My F350 was one of the good trucks, but my EB is one of the suckass trucks. I get an average of 15-16mpg, on country paved roads, on freeway, in town, etc. The only time I seen my average climb is when I was driving 54mpg with a stiff tailwind. I have done hand calculations and talked to other EB owners. My truck seems to suck, bad.

I drive empty most of the time, pulled a trailer once since I bought it. Its a 2011 Lariat CC SB 4x4 with a cheap floppy bed cover. I have all of 8000 miles on it and probly wont see a lot more. This is a lot of money to spend for a teeny tiny motor that is sported to get 20+mpg. I have the truck parked for the most part and drive my MB ML500, with a 5.0 v8 that gets 20-22 mpg.

Yes, this is more of a rant than a posting. Just a little pissed off that a $45,000 v6 truck gets worse mileage than the v8 models.
 
  #2  
Old 09-07-2011, 11:00 AM
MCDavis's Avatar
MCDavis
MCDavis is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RVA
Posts: 10,459
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jeffdoerr
Cryptic title. I know.

Seems from what I have been reading and experiencing, there are 2 distinct levels of mileage on the ecoboost trucks, good and bad. Just like what I encountered when I had my 2000 F350 7.3 truck. You either got poor or good and there was no between figures. Some trucks got 13 mpg, some got 18mpg. My F350 was one of the good trucks, but my EB is one of the suckass trucks. I get an average of 15-16mpg, on country paved roads, on freeway, in town, etc. The only time I seen my average climb is when I was driving 54mpg with a stiff tailwind. I have done hand calculations and talked to other EB owners. My truck seems to suck, bad.

I drive empty most of the time, pulled a trailer once since I bought it. Its a 2011 Lariat CC SB 4x4 with a cheap floppy bed cover. I have all of 8000 miles on it and probly wont see a lot more. This is a lot of money to spend for a teeny tiny motor that is sported to get 20+mpg. I have the truck parked for the most part and drive my MB ML500, with a 5.0 v8 that gets 20-22 mpg.

Yes, this is more of a rant than a posting. Just a little pissed off that a $45,000 v6 truck gets worse mileage than the v8 models.

Sig line:
[b]11 F150 CC 4x4 Ecoboost
[b]05 F150 CC 4x4 5.4 - gone
[b]04 MB ML500 Sport - sitting pretty in my driveway
Got 4G ? - Sr Field Lead Tech
Probably time to update your sig line...just sayin
 
  #3  
Old 09-08-2011, 09:09 AM
spdmpo's Avatar
spdmpo
spdmpo is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 2,544
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
So you got rid of the PSD too, huh? I'm the opposite of you, I couldn't break 13mpg on my 2000 PSD no matter what. I'm getting an honest 18mpg on my new truck, and have made 20mph on a road trip (empty).
 
  #4  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:20 PM
Brandon150's Avatar
Brandon150
Brandon150 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spdmpo
So you got rid of the PSD too, huh? I'm the opposite of you, I couldn't break 13mpg on my 2000 PSD no matter what. I'm getting an honest 18mpg on my new truck, and have made 20mph on a road trip (empty).

Same I'm avg 18.5 and at 65 mph all highway can see 20. Scab 3.55 2x4 EB 2.5" level 12 k miles xlt
 
  #5  
Old 09-20-2011, 08:11 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4
efx4 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,058
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mileage seems to depend on the truck size and rear axle ratio. My boss's King Ranch shows around mid 15's, but he has a heavy foot too. It's reported that towing mileage is not stellar due to the turbo's spooling causing more fuel to be injected to keep the engine from running lean, and to keep the turbo's fed.
 
  #6  
Old 09-21-2011, 02:26 AM
Mach1's Avatar
Mach1
Mach1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Spicewood, TX.
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get 19mpg every tank in my 7.3, same as the 6.0L and the EB gets 22-23mpg...and looking to get more..

You have to keep the turbos from boosting to get any kind of mileage..

I was this close to getting a 6.7(since I am a diesel guy). But with the EB getting 30% better mileage and diesel $.30 more a gallon, it was a no brainer..

All of mine are 2WD, cause the 4X4's lose at least 3mpg..
 
  #7  
Old 09-22-2011, 12:20 AM
jimmyb08SD's Avatar
jimmyb08SD
jimmyb08SD is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, Fl
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
17 -19 local and 20-23 highway consistently now for almost 6000 miles.
 
  #8  
Old 09-23-2011, 02:29 AM
Eric Landstrom's Avatar
Eric Landstrom
Eric Landstrom is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jeffdoerr
Cryptic title. I know.

Seems from what I have been reading and experiencing, there are 2 distinct levels of mileage on the ecoboost trucks, good and bad. Just like what I encountered when I had my 2000 F350 7.3 truck. You either got poor or good and there was no between figures. Some trucks got 13 mpg, some got 18mpg. My F350 was one of the good trucks, but my EB is one of the suckass trucks. I get an average of 15-16mpg, on country paved roads, on freeway, in town, etc. The only time I seen my average climb is when I was driving 54mpg with a stiff tailwind. I have done hand calculations and talked to other EB owners. My truck seems to suck, bad.

I drive empty most of the time, pulled a trailer once since I bought it. Its a 2011 Lariat CC SB 4x4 with a cheap floppy bed cover. I have all of 8000 miles on it and probly wont see a lot more. This is a lot of money to spend for a teeny tiny motor that is sported to get 20+mpg. I have the truck parked for the most part and drive my MB ML500, with a 5.0 v8 that gets 20-22 mpg.

Yes, this is more of a rant than a posting. Just a little pissed off that a $45,000 v6 truck gets worse mileage than the v8 models.
I'm getting 17-18 with my EB screw long bed 4x4. My MB, on the other hand, gets about 15 at best. My thoughts are that I don't care about fuel economy. I purchased the EB for its capabilities.
 
  #9  
Old 09-23-2011, 07:31 AM
96sherm's Avatar
96sherm
96sherm is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yorkton Sask
Posts: 20,099
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jeffdoerr
Cryptic title. I know.

Seems from what I have been reading and experiencing, there are 2 distinct levels of mileage on the ecoboost trucks, good and bad. Just like what I encountered when I had my 2000 F350 7.3 truck. You either got poor or good and there was no between figures. Some trucks got 13 mpg, some got 18mpg. My F350 was one of the good trucks, but my EB is one of the suckass trucks. I get an average of 15-16mpg, on country paved roads, on freeway, in town, etc. The only time I seen my average climb is when I was driving 54mpg with a stiff tailwind. I have done hand calculations and talked to other EB owners. My truck seems to suck, bad.

I drive empty most of the time, pulled a trailer once since I bought it. Its a 2011 Lariat CC SB 4x4 with a cheap floppy bed cover. I have all of 8000 miles on it and probly wont see a lot more. This is a lot of money to spend for a teeny tiny motor that is sported to get 20+mpg. I have the truck parked for the most part and drive my MB ML500, with a 5.0 v8 that gets 20-22 mpg.

Yes, this is more of a rant than a posting. Just a little pissed off that a $45,000 v6 truck gets worse mileage than the v8 models.
Try having someone check for bad tunes, misaligned wheels, dragging brakes, a bearing too tight somewhere... There's possibly something mechanically hindering the truck from "free rolling" and making your engine labor all the time. Another thing is ditch that "cheap floppy bed cover"... I have something similar on mine and notice better mileage and less drag without the cover. Unless its a hard shell cover, tonneau covers will do nothing for your mpg.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bills86f150
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
7
03-21-2012 04:23 PM
TexasTroop
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
218
03-24-2007 01:33 PM
new2dsl
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
03-23-2004 01:00 PM
woodnut
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
12
02-16-2004 09:22 PM
chegg439
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
19
11-29-2002 12:36 PM



Quick Reply: EB mileage levels just like 7.3 PSD levels ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.