Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 07-12-2011, 05:24 PM
6.9idi's Avatar
6.9idi
6.9idi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok maybe not 350 i thought the truck was rated a 220 stock but anways. I know im going to get more than stock hp outta it with a $2000 budget.
 
  #17  
Old 07-12-2011, 05:26 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 971 Likes on 767 Posts
Originally Posted by 6.9idi
ok finding that the engine had 185hp stock maybe my 350hp is a lil off
Right.. so with that reality check your next question is.. "so how much HP can I make within budget?" 300hp isn't that hard or expensive, maybe a little more with GT40 heads or some home porting on the stock E7s. Rebuild the bottom end to stock spec with 0.030" over pistons, get the heads ready, install the Comp 35-349-8(like a HO cam with more lift, and yes it's SD friendly), bolt on headers and a complete exhaust system, and there you go. I'd also suggest installing 4.10 gears in the rear axle and some traction bars, and a shift kit in the trans and then you're all set to go rice hunting.
 
  #18  
Old 07-12-2011, 05:32 PM
6.9idi's Avatar
6.9idi
6.9idi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
Right.. so with that reality check your next question is.. "so how much HP can I make within budget?" 300hp isn't that hard or expensive, maybe a little more with GT40 heads or some home porting on the stock E7s. Rebuild the bottom end to stock spec with 0.030" over pistons, get the heads ready, install the Comp 35-349-8(like a HO cam with more lift, and yes it's SD friendly), bolt on headers and a complete exhaust system, and there you go. I'd also suggest installing 4.10 gears in the rear axle and some traction bars, and a shift kit in the trans and then you're all set to go rice hunting.

I like your thinking. Not too extreme but enough.
 
  #19  
Old 07-12-2011, 05:38 PM
6.9idi's Avatar
6.9idi
6.9idi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pual do you have a link to that comp cam you where talking about?
 
  #20  
Old 07-12-2011, 10:04 PM
Encho's Avatar
Encho
Encho is offline
The Southernmost Mod
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 6,902
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Also he's keeping in mind two important parts: reliability and long run affordability (little to none extra maintenance and a chance you mileage will actually go up a little).
 
  #21  
Old 07-12-2011, 10:44 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 971 Likes on 767 Posts
Originally Posted by 6.9idi
Pual do you have a link to that comp cam you where talking about?
Here you go. BTW... it's the cam I have in my 5.0 right now.

COMP Cams 35-349-8 - COMP Cams Xtreme Energy Camshafts - Overview - SummitRacing.com
 
  #22  
Old 07-13-2011, 10:07 AM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
You're not, but the 5.8 will make a 100 ft/lbs more TQ at 2000rpm. Same goes for a 347 but then you're back to needing a 5.8 computer or possibly a MAF upgrade depending how well the motor breaths.
You don't need the 351 computer, just "Cross-wire" the injectors, and they use the same plug for the distributors. Thats what I did. I had a 5.0 in a 89, and I put in a 351 and kept the same computer.
 
  #23  
Old 07-13-2011, 10:10 AM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also from what research I have done. You can take a SD 351w, add good heads, headers, intake, throttle body, and larger injectors and get +-330hp, without even camming it up, or boring it out.
 
  #24  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:16 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 971 Likes on 767 Posts
Originally Posted by SCRebel
You don't need the 351 computer, just "Cross-wire" the injectors, Thats what I did. I had a 5.0 in a 89, and I put in a 351 and kept the same computer.
You messed up then, the injectors are batch fired and should not be altered at all, the only thing that has to change is the spark plug wiring order.
 
  #25  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:20 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 971 Likes on 767 Posts
Originally Posted by SCRebel
Also from what research I have done. You can take a SD 351w, add good heads, headers, intake, throttle body, and larger injectors and get +-330hp, without even camming it up, or boring it out.
Sorry but.. larger injectors will not cooperate with a stock SD computer, and if someone did all that and only got 330hp they wasted their money because you can get nearly 300hp without the heads, intake, TB, and injectors.
 
  #26  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:56 PM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
You messed up then, the injectors are batch fired and should not be altered at all, the only thing that has to change is the spark plug wiring order.
What do you mean "batch" fired?
 
  #27  
Old 07-13-2011, 01:02 PM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
They'll fire in sets of 4....or, in batches.....

The first batch will fire in sequence, then the second batch will fire, and it wall repeats....
 
  #28  
Old 07-13-2011, 01:29 PM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
They'll fire in sets of 4....or, in batches.....

The first batch will fire in sequence, then the second batch will fire, and it wall repeats....
Do you know the specific order? or what injectors are in each batch?. It would seem 5.0 or 5.8 wouldn't really matter if they fire in batches
 
  #29  
Old 07-13-2011, 01:43 PM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
My assumptions on that would be, the firing order....Go 1-4, then 5-8...Whatever the firing order is....

I assume that the firing order would be the same as the injector sequence....As it wouldn't make sense to squirt fuel on a non-firing piston....
 
  #30  
Old 07-13-2011, 01:53 PM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
My assumptions on that would be, the firing order....Go 1-4, then 5-8...Whatever the firing order is....

I assume that the firing order would be the same as the injector sequence....As it wouldn't make sense to fire fuel on a non-firing piston....
I did some searching, and the firing order and the injector firing order do not match,. 5.0 firing is 1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8. & injector firing order is #1-(1-4-5-8), #2-(2-3-6-7).

Its supposed to evenly distribute fuel in the intake

Because of this, Why should it matter 5.0 or 5.8?
 


Quick Reply: 5.0 rebuild



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.