Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-27-2010, 10:09 AM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 939
Bootlegger's Deluxe is starting off with a positive reputation.
8.8 rear disc brake swap

i was looking at putting rear disc brakes on my 87 F150 with the 8.8 rear end. My thoughts were IF the flanges line up, i was going to do a swap off of a 97 - newer F150 with an 8.8. i realize that i'm going to have to re-drill the rotor to fit the correct bolt pattern, but other than this and other minor nuances ( i think i'm going to have to run a 16 inch wheel) does anyone see any issues with this swap?? is there a better swap out there??
__________________
Shifts Happen ...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2010, 11:05 AM
mikeismadness's Avatar
mikeismadness mikeismadness is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: laporte in
Posts: 1,858
mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.
here check this out...seems legit. 8.8 Ford Rear Disc Brake Kit
__________________
2005 F250 CCSB 3V V10, 4.10LS, Flowmaster 44, Diablo Predator on 91 Tune
Stimulating the economy, 9.3 mpg avg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2010, 11:07 AM
mikeismadness's Avatar
mikeismadness mikeismadness is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: laporte in
Posts: 1,858
mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.
also found this too...8.8" 1984-96 Disc Brake Conv.
__________________
2005 F250 CCSB 3V V10, 4.10LS, Flowmaster 44, Diablo Predator on 91 Tune
Stimulating the economy, 9.3 mpg avg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2010, 05:07 PM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 939
Bootlegger's Deluxe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeismadness View Post
also found this too...8.8" 1984-96 Disc Brake Conv.
i had this setup on another car (since burnt to the ground) and i wasn't very pleased with it ... really was hoping to go with the "drum in hat" e-brake, it's a manual transmission, so e-brakes come in handy ...
__________________
Shifts Happen ...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2010, 12:51 AM
xxshine xxshine is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ca.
Posts: 295
xxshine is starting off with a positive reputation.
Why go disk The stock drum brakes are big enough even for towing. My truck has rear anti locks, and i know that disks don't lock up and drums do, ( thus the anti lock design ), but still....why ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2010, 09:33 AM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 939
Bootlegger's Deluxe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxshine View Post
Why go disk The stock drum brakes are big enough even for towing. My truck has rear anti locks, and i know that disks don't lock up and drums do, ( thus the anti lock design ), but still....why ?
I was awaiting the "why not go drum" post ... simply put, i'm going autocrossing. I want to show imports that my old truck can haul more than lumber ...
__________________
Shifts Happen ...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-2010, 10:32 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,168
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Rear disks are far superior to drums..there are good reasons you don't see any drums on the newer trucks. From what I understand the parts from the Explorer 8.8 will bolt right on the F150 axle and of course the rotor has to be drilled for the larger bolt pattern, I have been wanting to do to my truck for some time now but haven't stumbled across the parts yet.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-28-2010, 11:48 AM
zxwut?'s Avatar
zxwut? zxwut? is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Afghanistan!~
Posts: 1,734
zxwut? is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.zxwut? is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I don't understand why when someone brings up the idea of rear discs, at least 1 person has to bring up some crazy theory about drums somehow being superior. Such nonsense.
__________________
2009 Focus
2008 Hayabusa with lots o' engine/suspension/brake stuff done, 190hp, 113ft lbs torque......without the nitrous
2006 Husqvarna SM510R uncorked and unrestricted
2003 Honda 954RR all stock
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-28-2010, 02:07 PM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 939
Bootlegger's Deluxe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
Rear disks are far superior to drums..there are good reasons you don't see any drums on the newer trucks. From what I understand the parts from the Explorer 8.8 will bolt right on the F150 axle and of course the rotor has to be drilled for the larger bolt pattern, I have been wanting to do to my truck for some time now but haven't stumbled across the parts yet.
From my understanding, the Crown vic has the exact same brake parts. I've done this swap before onto cars, but i was concerned that the rotor wouldn't clear the larger F150 axle end ... hmmm ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by zxwut? View Post
I don't understand why when someone brings up the idea of rear discs, at least 1 person has to bring up some crazy theory about drums somehow being superior. Such nonsense.
They were superior .... in the 1950's ... lol.

I didn't start a thread to discuss whether or not it's a good idea, i've already made up my mind to do the swap, i'm just looking for the right set of parts ...
__________________
Shifts Happen ...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-28-2010, 02:37 PM
zxwut?'s Avatar
zxwut? zxwut? is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Afghanistan!~
Posts: 1,734
zxwut? is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.zxwut? is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bootlegger's Deluxe View Post
They were superior .... in the 1950's ... lol.

I didn't start a thread to discuss whether or not it's a good idea, i've already made up my mind to do the swap, i'm just looking for the right set of parts ...
Cool man. Let us know what you end up with.
__________________
2009 Focus
2008 Hayabusa with lots o' engine/suspension/brake stuff done, 190hp, 113ft lbs torque......without the nitrous
2006 Husqvarna SM510R uncorked and unrestricted
2003 Honda 954RR all stock
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-28-2010, 09:16 PM
mikeismadness's Avatar
mikeismadness mikeismadness is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: laporte in
Posts: 1,858
mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.mikeismadness has a good reputation on FTE.
i've always wanted to try it myself...never got around to it...im thinkin the best way to do it might be the explorer option since they used the 15" rims
__________________
2005 F250 CCSB 3V V10, 4.10LS, Flowmaster 44, Diablo Predator on 91 Tune
Stimulating the economy, 9.3 mpg avg
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-28-2010, 09:49 PM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 939
Bootlegger's Deluxe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeismadness View Post
i've always wanted to try it myself...never got around to it...im thinkin the best way to do it might be the explorer option since they used the 15" rims
As i stated before, my only concern with that setup is clearing the axle flange. if someone verified that i could do it with that setup, i'd be all over it! I'm kinda odd in the fact that i dont like going aftermarket when there's a factory swap out there, the main reason being when it comes time to replace a pad, rotor, or caliper, i don't need to go searching across the cyber universe to find it, i can go to my friendly NAPA store...
__________________
Shifts Happen ...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-29-2010, 07:37 AM
Scndsin's Avatar
Scndsin Scndsin is offline
MS Sweet Magnolia Blues
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 4,195
Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.Scndsin has a spectacular reputation.
The explorer rotor won't clear the 150 axle flange as is. The flange has to be turned down just a bit. The hub opening might need enlarging a fraction. Everything else (after drilling 5x51/2 pattern) is bolt on.
__________________
David- Mississippi Chapter Leader
94 F-150 XLT 5.8/E4OD SuperCab, 2WD
Join the Mississippi Chapter, HERE
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-29-2010, 08:44 AM
hav24wheel's Avatar
hav24wheel hav24wheel is online now
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 9,400
hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zxwut? View Post
I don't understand why when someone brings up the idea of rear discs, at least 1 person has to bring up some crazy theory about drums somehow being superior. Such nonsense.

Maybe that one person figures if all wheel drums are good enough for a 80,000 pound semi, they are good enough for a pickup....

(I like all wheel disks on pickups, expecally if off roading, they work way better when wet then a drum)
__________________


Dave

2003 Excursion Limited, V10, 4.88s, 315/75R16s on 16x10s
100% posting from iPhone
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-29-2010, 08:46 AM
hav24wheel's Avatar
hav24wheel hav24wheel is online now
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 9,400
hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.hav24wheel has a spectacular reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scndsin View Post
The explorer rotor won't clear the 150 axle flange as is. The flange has to be turned down just a bit. The hub opening might need enlarging a fraction. Everything else (after drilling 5x51/2 pattern) is bolt on.

Any idea if there is a different off the shelf rotor that will fit without mods?
__________________


Dave

2003 Excursion Limited, V10, 4.88s, 315/75R16s on 16x10s
100% posting from iPhone
Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2010, 08:46 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Tags
1986, 1994, 88, 94, brake, bronco, clip, conversion, disc, disk, elimnator, f150, ford, rear, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disc/Disc M/C flattie39 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 8 03-23-2014 11:57 AM
disk brake conversion for the 8.8 rear axle shore 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco 2 10-20-2013 01:01 AM
Rear disc brake swap?? rangergirl94 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 9 12-12-2012 09:03 AM
Need help with brakes for 1988 F-250 LD axle swap (possible disc swap??) Bugzturbo Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels 3 12-06-2012 12:03 AM
Need help with brakes for 1988 F-250 LD axle swap (possible disc swap??) Bugzturbo Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case 0 11-20-2012 11:27 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup