Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Best & Worst Engines Ever Made ?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1186  
Old 07-23-2011, 12:43 PM
scottman70's Avatar
scottman70
scottman70 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Louisville Joe
Ouch! Funniest thing I read all day, particularly the bit about the 300 (and they replaced it with what, the 4.2L V-6? What a POS- you think the Triton's got problems....).

In all fairness, the LS's had more than a little piston slap trouble.

Something that works- 4.4" bore spacing is indeed common from the earliest '55 265 to a new LS-7. But, there is one other similarity that will guarantee the popularity of the LS. It has the same bell housing bolt pattern as the old SBC. Hear that, Ford?!? Could you just imagine if all FE's, Windsors, Clevelands, Limas, and Mods could bolt to any Toploader, FMX, C-4, C-6, AOD, AOD-E, E4OD, 4R100......
I own 3 LS motors and an 8.1 motor, and have never had piston slap issues on any of them. 2001-101K miles, 2003-166K miles, 2006-83K miles & 2006 8.1-52K miles......It must not be that common?? Not here to defend GM or bash any other makes, but my LS motors have been problem free, on the 03, it needed an intake manifold gasket replaced, thats it! My 99 454 had piston slap but that was a whole different motor of course....it piston slapped for 213K miles before I sold it.
 
  #1187  
Old 08-03-2011, 05:40 PM
Big Bad's Avatar
Big Bad
Big Bad is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Louisville Joe
The LS and SBF are both 4 stroke 90 degree V-8's, and as such they are bound to have some similarities. There are only 2 possible V-8 firing orders with a 90 degree crank, do you mean to say that every engine that uses an 302 HO/351 firing order was based on an SBF?
Ford Flathead: 1-5-4-8-6-3-7-2
Ford 302: 1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8
Ford 351/4.6/5.4/302HO: 1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8
Ford 5.0 Modular: 1-5-4-8-6-3-7-2

That's 3 different 90 degree V8 firing orders, BTW.
 
  #1188  
Old 08-03-2011, 05:43 PM
Big Bad's Avatar
Big Bad
Big Bad is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by quaddriver
the LS1 head design which begats LS anything is something completely new and while that tall thin port flows well and fast on the street, one that is properly ported is just sick (A number of years back I posted some pics from my work at centroid where Tom Hemphill Racing took a grinder to an LS1 head and made something capable of supporting Nascar requirements) Something that cannot even be attampted on a production head without a recast of the port locations and paths
The cathedral port 241/243s in no way resemble L92/LS3/LS7 intake ports. I'd be curious to see those ported 241 numbers, because a touch over 300 cfm doesn't come close to NASCAR requirements.

Ford, sadly chose not to do the same and instead sentenced us to 15 years of spun bearings, oil starved heads cracked heads, audible piston slap and go knows what else the Curse of the Tritons has run down upon us. (heck, they should all die just for getting rid of the 300-6)
So basically you're out of touch with reality.
 
  #1189  
Old 08-03-2011, 05:45 PM
plumberglen's Avatar
plumberglen
plumberglen is offline
New User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ALBERTA,CANADA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The worst engine i ever had was the 351 M, which was in a 78 Ford -1/2 ton, Guttless and sucked alot of gas
 
  #1190  
Old 08-05-2011, 02:22 PM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350
SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really liked my 300/6
which I drove for 22years, and love my 2008 5.4 2 valve ( in an E350). But, time will tell. People are always talking about how gutless they are but I just dont understand that at all. I've concluded that they just don't rev them enough.
 
  #1191  
Old 08-05-2011, 04:38 PM
charger7022's Avatar
charger7022
charger7022 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would have to say without help all the ford trucks are gutless. i have a v-10 ex now and yeah its gutless compared to my 04 hemi and my 05 cummins and the chevy 6.0 i drive at work yeah the fords are pretty gutless but i havent driven a new new ford we have and 08 5.4 for work trucks to and they are yep gutless but thats the newest ive driven sorry to bash ford here but just stating my personal opinion.
 
  #1192  
Old 08-06-2011, 04:14 PM
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
cheezit is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N. Fort Worth, tx
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
worst ford enigne ever the 2.5l hsc. second in line the 2.5l probe engine(really mazada crap).the 6.4 is currently there worst engine followed by a 5.4 3v.
the best 260,289,302,4.6(2v and 4v)
the one I liek the best are the 2v 4.6 and sadlly I hate to say a 6.0.
 
  #1193  
Old 09-29-2011, 09:36 PM
rjr49's Avatar
rjr49
rjr49 is offline
New User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are all NUTs!!!! 10HP Kohler (K241) most awesome of all time. OK that was a little tongue in cheek. But, until Honda came along it was hard to beat. REALLY!!!!!! How could anyone think that the GM 350 Diesel wasn't the worst mass produced engine of all time. Broken Crankshafts!!! Who ever heard of a broken crank in a passenger car? Especially one driven by little old ladies!!!
 
  #1194  
Old 09-30-2011, 01:27 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by charger7022
i would have to say without help all the ford trucks are gutless. i have a v-10 ex now and yeah its gutless compared to my 04 hemi and my 05 cummins and the chevy 6.0 i drive at work yeah the fords are pretty gutless but i havent driven a new new ford we have and 08 5.4 for work trucks to and they are yep gutless but thats the newest ive driven sorry to bash ford here but just stating my personal opinion.
I am afraid I'll have to be the one to shoot you down here. I've got a 2011 F-150 FX4 with the 5.0L V8 and its far from gutless. It's easily got more juice than my friends Hemi Dodge. As a matter of the fact...I can comfortable say its probably the quickest out of the factory 1/2 ton I've ever driven. The only two that I've driven and personally feel would run a race with it is the 6.2L Powered Silverado and the 5.7L Powered Tundra. But really as of any Ford truck made as of 2011 a newer...You would be crazy to say its underpowered.

As for the pre-2011 models...

Well for almost a decade the 5.4L and 4.6L were Fords weak spot in their 1/2 tons. Although I still will argue that the 5.4L towed better than any 5.3L Chevy I ever drove. The 5.3L Chevy may have generally been faster without a trailer hooked up...But the 5.4L handled extra weight alot better. But the Hemi's, Titans, and Tundra's were always quicker than the 5.4L F-150's.

The V-10's...I don't have to much experience with the V-10's honestly...I have driven a few...But I've never towed any weight with one. Back in highschool my friend had a 1999 F-250 Crew Cab 4X4 with a V-10 and his truck was infact pretty gutless, granted that it had over 200,000 hard worked miles on it. It was slow and it sucked gas about 9mpg avarage. But he drove the living hell out of it and it never faulterd. Never had any issues with it...He traded it in on a Cummins Dodge a few years back, and to this day he wish's he had his old V-10 back...His Cummin's Dodge has proven to be a huge expensive headache.

I drove his V-10 on occasion and as I said it was gutless...I don't know if you have ever driven a 2005+ V-10?...But that was the year they went from 2v to 3v design...I did test drive a new 3v V-10 back in 2006 and it was quite a bit more powerful than my buddies old 2v V-10.

I can carry this all the way back the 1990s...

My first pickup that I got for myself in highscool was a 1990 F-150 2WD XLT Lariat with the 302 V8. At the time another of my friends owned a 1993 Silverado with the TBI 350 V8. One day he and I went to the track to see who was quicker down the 1/4 mile and I beat him by a half second with a 4mph higher trap speed...''For the record my old 1990 also outran my friends F-250 with the V-10.
 
  #1195  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:33 AM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350
SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about the 444 Cummins or any ACERT Cat engine? The ACERT Cats were such a miserable failure that Caterpilar got out of the heavy truck market altogether!
 
  #1196  
Old 10-05-2011, 02:55 AM
wmbeattie's Avatar
wmbeattie
wmbeattie is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crosley Hot Shots had an engine block made out of plates brazed together. Bad idea!
 
  #1197  
Old 10-08-2011, 10:02 PM
fordman141's Avatar
fordman141
fordman141 is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had an 05 F150 with the 4.6L gutless wonder that wouldnt pull your hat off your head. It had the death rattle on a cold start at like 30,000 miles. That was a pitiful excuse for a V8. I used to have a 68 f100 with the 351W and now i have a 74 f100 with a 302 and they will sqaull tires all day long.
 
  #1198  
Old 10-08-2011, 10:56 PM
bondo7's Avatar
bondo7
bondo7 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ill
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My brother has a cummings in his 05 1 ton Dodge, has over 300000 mi never been rebuilt.He spent all his money on tranny.
I've drove about every ford engine in the last 25 years,i like em all!!!!!!!!!!
Don't forget the 4 cly model A,also easey to work on.
 
  #1199  
Old 10-19-2011, 07:55 AM
shortride's Avatar
shortride
shortride is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: 46th State
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
The 255 was in 1980 and 1981 Fox Mustangs was considered one of the worst engine ever built.

8-1/2 years has got to be one of the longest threads. lol
 
  #1200  
Old 10-28-2011, 09:26 AM
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
f100beatertruck is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Too many posts to read through but I would hope someone mentioned the Chevy 262 and 267 from the smog era. They are related to the classic 350 and that motor, along with it's 4" bore cousins the 327 and 302 are among some of the best engines out there.

A couple of Fords off the top of my head would be the 300 I6 and the 5.0 Windsor. 1 it's very compact and fits into anything and 2 you can make a bazzilion HP with one provided you address the block. However with a stock block and EFI you can make 350hp out of 302ci and stick it into your daily driver. Pretty good for an old school 2v OHV engine.

Back to GM, their LS motors are killer and definitely in the running for "Best".
 


Quick Reply: Best & Worst Engines Ever Made ?!?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 AM.