my gears, guess what!!!!!!!!
#17
whats up guys....i just got in from work....thanks for the support. to texas guy 001 i am going to keep the tire size and to andyman7931 i did talk to the shop that installed the gears and the owner said that he would come out to my place to look at the gears and give me and answer this friday afternoon. the owner asked me what happened and i told him what happened and he sounded shocked that it broke. to lcam-01xa my trans has a metal plate on it that says aode/w on it. to andyman7931 and 6cyl bill i will think about the 4.10 gears. to skyfox10 what does it mean when you said the rpms are so low that it keeps the computer in an open loop. i drive on the freeway to and from work around 7 miles so i don't want too much gear in it to where it will start to put a damper on my gas and mileage.....thanks for reading my post guys and for the support.........talk to guys later........time to have me some dinner..............
#18
Here is a quote from our beloved conanski:
The last comment here is key to why appropriate gearing for the engine/vehicle/tire combo is necessary for best milage. If the engine has to work less to move the vehicle it will use less gas it's as simple as that. For example there is a 6-8 mpg difference in instantanious fuel consumption between closed and open loop operation as calculated by the tuning software I have. Cruising at 55mph on level ground it reports 18-20mpg with the engine turing 1750rpm but as soon as a grade is encountered and engine load goes above 60% it drops out of closed loop and milage goes down to about 12mpg. If the hill is big and it has to drop a gear milage goes down even further to about 8mpg. Interestingly if I select drive engine speed jumps to about 2500rpm and the computer stays in closed loop up the hills because engine load is much lower, but because the rpms are higher fuel milage is still down around 12mpg. My calculations would seem to indicate the happy medium for a 5.0 in my truck would be gearing that produces about 2200rpm at 70mph cruising speed. Right now it is about 2000rpm and that puts the motor under too much load most of the time, but my 5.8 had no problem with the exact same tire/gear combo(3.55/30") as evidenced by it's ability to regularly achieve 13 city and 17+ mpg highway.
#19
I must really be the odd man out.
I LOVE the 3.08 gears with the 5 speed, and the 302 in my old half ton. I can go over 100mph (not like i do often though!) and while cruising the highway (speed limit 110km/h here) I can average 20 mpg. (hand calculated, with filling the tank to the brim).
I can spin the tires on pavement in first and second gear, and do a pretty mean burn out (not like i do that often either) if needed!
Mind you the last thing my old truck towed was a fishing boat, and now the only thing that goes in the box is a few bags of garbage, so I dont use it as heavy as some of you may.
I LOVE the 3.08 gears with the 5 speed, and the 302 in my old half ton. I can go over 100mph (not like i do often though!) and while cruising the highway (speed limit 110km/h here) I can average 20 mpg. (hand calculated, with filling the tank to the brim).
I can spin the tires on pavement in first and second gear, and do a pretty mean burn out (not like i do that often either) if needed!
Mind you the last thing my old truck towed was a fishing boat, and now the only thing that goes in the box is a few bags of garbage, so I dont use it as heavy as some of you may.
#20
I can go over 100mph (not like i do often though!) and while cruising the highway (speed limit 110km/h here) I can average 20 mpg. (hand calculated, with filling the tank to the brim).
I can spin the tires on pavement in first and second gear, and do a pretty mean burn out (not like i do that often either) if needed!
I can spin the tires on pavement in first and second gear, and do a pretty mean burn out (not like i do that often either) if needed!
#21
I dont run over 100 very often, just tried to make the point that the truck seems to have all the speed and power I personally need! (all while getting pretty kickass economy when need be!)
I live in Saskatchewan, Canada, we dont have grades here! Pure flat land!
How do i calculate mileage? Well i fill the truck up, drive it till near empty, fill it up again, write down the miles ive went and the fuel I used, then do the simple math.
Then I repeat a few times over, to get a reasonable average.
I live in Saskatchewan, Canada, we dont have grades here! Pure flat land!
How do i calculate mileage? Well i fill the truck up, drive it till near empty, fill it up again, write down the miles ive went and the fuel I used, then do the simple math.
Then I repeat a few times over, to get a reasonable average.
#22
I guess I might be happy with the 3.08 gears if they raised the speed limit to 80mph and I never drove though any mountains. Hit a hill at 1700rpm and you gotta downshift. Hit that same incline at 80mph, getting over 2k rpm, and she just keeps gaining speed.
#23
Aerodynamically speaking, These trucks are a nightmare. I own a 3.08 truck with a 351 and I still think the 3.08 is a lame gear. In my opinion 3.55 should be the minimum gear period. It's been said that the 3.08 gear can run the RPM's so low on the highway, that it actually hurts fuel economy by keeping the computer in open loop.
I LOVE the 3.08 gears with the 5 speed, and the 302 in my old half ton. I can go over 100mph (not like i do often though!) and while cruising the highway (speed limit 110km/h here) I can average 20 mpg. (hand calculated, with filling the tank to the brim).
I can spin the tires on pavement in first and second gear, and do a pretty mean burn out (not like i do that often either) if needed!.
I can spin the tires on pavement in first and second gear, and do a pretty mean burn out (not like i do that often either) if needed!.
I think you misread his post - he was simply stating that he can go faster than 100 mph without revving the **** outta the engine, his 20mpg economy actually happens at his freeway speed limit of 110km/h which is 70 mph - I dunno about you, but if I had a halfton with OD gear and it didn't get at least 20 mpg on the freeway I'd be tearing into it the first paycheck available. And hand calculations is done like this - fill up tank, drive to empty, fill up again, drive to empty again, and keep repeating this from the UP to the Gulf of Mexico, then you divide the distance you traveled by the total amount of fuel you dumped into the tank and here's your 20mph fuel economy. It's the same way I know my old Chev would get 20 mpg from Detroit to Dallas and back, and that my diesel averages between 18 and 20 mpg as long as I keep her in OD at 1900 rpms.
#24
the 3.08 or 3.07 rear gears were a blessing, she would pull steady 20 mpg running with the big rigs on the freeway....yes I know mine was no Ford but the principle is the same - with these pathetic power outputs the factory gave us you pretty much have to chose gears to negate the engine's deficiencies instead of complementing its strong areas.
And hand calculations is done like this - fill up tank, drive to empty, fill up again, drive to empty again, and keep repeating this from the UP to the Gulf of Mexico, then you divide the distance you traveled by the total amount of fuel you dumped into the tank and here's your 20mph fuel economy. It's the same way I know my old Chev would get 20 mpg from Detroit to Dallas and back, and that my diesel averages between 18 and 20 mpg as long as I keep her in OD at 1900 rpms.
#25
I'm actually quite familiar with this method of finding fuel economy. I was asking how preppypyro was calculating his mileage.
#26
Actually it does, this is a common thing when the engine load increases, even carburetors do it - whether it's power piston (Q-jets and Edelbrocks), power valves (Holleys and such), or ECM running off the MAP signal, the moment the vacuum goes down the fuel delivered to the cylinders increases.
But my beef was with the rather restricted factory calibrations (whether it's a GM or a Ford, they all do it) that operate the engines in a way that we can't use them to their full potential - once you're past these limitations new driveline combinations become possible, in other words my comment was directed towards those people who said 3.08s do not belong in a pickup truck and that we should all be running 3.55s and more...
I suppose you are right that every gear ratio has it's purpose, maybe my idea of a trucks purpose is a little biased.
Btw, what engine were you running it that Chevy? I wouldn't mind seeing mileage in the 20's with my truck, but I'd settle for over 15.
#27
Skyfox said something I think is interesting. The slower I go when I hit a hill, the more gear I need. If I hit a big hill going 35- 45, I have to put the truck in second gear. However I can hit a MASSIVE hill going 60 and not come out of OD. Take the same MASSIVE hill going 70 and the truck has an even easier time.
Considering the low revving I6 and low gears, you would think it would be opposite!!
Considering the low revving I6 and low gears, you would think it would be opposite!!
#28
Got a question for y'all...I got a 95 with the 300 and I'm running 31x10.5R15 mud tires on mine. I"m not sure what gears i have in the rear end but whatever they are they are stock. What would be the best gears to run in this setup? I do pull trailers occasionally, up to 5000lbs, but mostly do a lot of highway driving and used as a farm truck off road as well. Any advice would be awesome!
#29
Hi jjarboe01. I have the same size tires and type and I have a 300. I made the mistake of installing a 4.11 gear set. Way too low.
Since you pull heavy loads, I recomend 3.73.. But no lower than that. The 4.11 really narrows down the 300's powerband. It kills highway power the milage.
3.73 sounds spot on for your application. If you didn't tow, I would say 3.55.
Since you pull heavy loads, I recomend 3.73.. But no lower than that. The 4.11 really narrows down the 300's powerband. It kills highway power the milage.
3.73 sounds spot on for your application. If you didn't tow, I would say 3.55.
#30
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,978
Likes: 0
Received 995 Likes
on
784 Posts
You think these trucks are bad aerodynamically, try mid- to late-'70s fullsize Chevy trucks, like pushing a brick wall through the air. I had one of those a few years back, with the TH350 trans the 3.08 or 3.07 rear gears were a blessing, she would pull steady 20 mpg running with the big rigs on the freeway. So don't kick the 3.08s to the curb quite yet, they have their place and use
So for anybody that has a 5.0 truck with 3.08 gears keep it out of OD unless you're cruising on a flat freeway.. it will actually return better milage.