What would you call it?
#1
09-08-2009, 07:50 PM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
09-08-2009, 08:09 PM
#4
09-08-2009, 10:54 PM
#5
09-10-2009, 10:36 AM
#6
09-21-2009, 05:58 AM
#7
09-21-2009, 11:40 AM
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: E Washington
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#9
09-22-2009, 06:43 AM
#14
09-23-2009, 09:00 PM
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As much as I Cherish the Powerstroke Name
THe Powerstroke reputation took a bad bad hit with the 6.0 and just like those who own a dadge for the Cummins, many WON'T own a Ford because of the PowerStroke. The powerstroke was a Joint venture between Ford and International, This is an all new motor made solely by Ford with probably a larger development cost then any motor before it. My vote is to let the new motor come with a new name and let it stand or crash on its own merit. And "Scorpian" in its own right is a pretty cool name.
THe Powerstroke reputation took a bad bad hit with the 6.0 and just like those who own a dadge for the Cummins, many WON'T own a Ford because of the PowerStroke. The powerstroke was a Joint venture between Ford and International, This is an all new motor made solely by Ford with probably a larger development cost then any motor before it. My vote is to let the new motor come with a new name and let it stand or crash on its own merit. And "Scorpian" in its own right is a pretty cool name.
#15
09-24-2009, 12:41 PM
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From where im standing its purty hard to make an argument against what your saying, but then i think Ford mite place its decision on the long success they had with the ole 7.3. Thats what i wudve done... Also i think the 6.4 seems better to. From what i unnerstand the 6.0 problem was a relative short (albeit costly) mishap.