Notices

K & N Filters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-26-2005, 11:33 AM
TritonV-10's Avatar
TritonV-10
TritonV-10 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K & N Filters

Has anyone purchased a K&N Filter kit and was there much improvement if any.
 
  #2  
Old 05-26-2005, 01:20 PM
sigma's Avatar
sigma
sigma is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reusable filters are handy and economical. When it gets dirty just pop it out, clean it up, spray a little oil on it, and throw it back in. Do they filter as well? I don’t really know. There is a body of evidence on the Internet that claims this type of filter is not effective at filtering out fine dust which could damage your engine. Of course there is another body of evidence that claims the reusable filters are every bit as effective as anything else on the market. I’ve used them off and on for the last 30 years on everything from street rods to serious off-road trucks and I’ve never had any problems. Do they add more power? Not a chance on a stock engine. Your stock air box and filter easily flows adequate air to support the stock HP and anything you are likely to gain with simple bolt-ons. You have to add a lot of HP before the filter (as long as it’s clean) begins starving the engine and limiting further gains.
 
  #3  
Old 05-26-2005, 02:33 PM
94van's Avatar
94van
94van is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my personal experience, it was a waste of $43. No improvement in mileage, or performance whatsoever.
 
  #4  
Old 05-27-2005, 02:33 AM
Torque1st's Avatar
Torque1st
Torque1st is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 30,255
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 26 Posts
Moved to proper forum.
 
  #5  
Old 05-27-2005, 03:13 AM
Bargod's Avatar
Bargod
Bargod is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita KS.
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I installed an Air Force One intake and reusable filter, and noticed a slight improvement in my mileage, but as far as horsepower goes, I can't see anyone showing any gains with just changing the filter.
 
  #6  
Old 05-27-2005, 08:19 AM
TritonV-10's Avatar
TritonV-10
TritonV-10 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the imput and I have reconsidered buying one, sounds like I'd be throwing my money in the air !
 
  #7  
Old 06-01-2005, 07:27 PM
aggiesailor's Avatar
aggiesailor
aggiesailor is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with exhaust you see inprovement

Well the K&N FIPK with an exhaust helps!
 
  #8  
Old 06-02-2005, 12:07 AM
RomerB2's Avatar
RomerB2
RomerB2 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bixby, OK
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can tell a difference with my Bronco II.. I have a hollowed cat and Flowmaster 40 series. It's not a huge difference, but if you route the air to the outside of the vehicle you gain 1 HP per 7*F lowered. The more mods you put on your truck, and the more HP you release from your engine, the better the K&N will perform.
 
  #9  
Old 06-05-2005, 03:01 PM
Steina's Avatar
Steina
Steina is offline
CO River Rat

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lake Havasu City AZ
Posts: 3,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Triton -

Check out http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest1.htm; it may help you decide not to run a K&N on the street. Also, Sigma forgot to add that reusable filters need to DRY after cleaning before you can oil them; kind of a pain if you need to use your truck right away.

Steve
 
  #10  
Old 06-05-2005, 09:38 PM
TJ-Ranger's Avatar
TJ-Ranger
TJ-Ranger is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 225
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FWIW...from that site...
"For the record, the K&N was the best flowing filter. Of the 3 types of media tested, the cotton gauze type filters flow best. There are other brands besides K&N for sale, of which most are probably made by K&N for resellers. Foam air filters flowed marginally better than paper. "
 
  #11  
Old 06-05-2005, 11:12 PM
MemOrex's Avatar
MemOrex
MemOrex is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: B/CS, Texas!!
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
$45 and I didn't get any stickers!?! WTF!?

lol, j/k. I noticed a lil better acceleration, but I have other mods too, though.
 
  #12  
Old 06-09-2005, 04:11 AM
PW01's Avatar
PW01
PW01 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I WAS a big fan of K&N air filters, ran one for 45,000+ in my Ranger, and for 30,000+ in the Wife's Honda. I just had to replace my IAC to correct a low idle, because it was so dirty that I could not get it even close to clean. It seemed to me (after following many K&N debates) that the only thing that could allow dirt to my IAC was my air filter. I've gone back to paper, maybe high flow does equal poor filtration!
 
  #13  
Old 06-09-2005, 05:43 AM
dschuffert's Avatar
dschuffert
dschuffert is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My experience is that the K&N filters increase potential airflow, which was noticeable to me when changing from a dirty stock filter. My concern is that K&N let too much particulate matter through the filter. It may be within manufacturer specifications, but I personally like to exceed the specifications on something like this. The cost of the filter for the small, if any performance gain, and the poor scrubbing capabilities sent me back to the paper based filters.
 
  #14  
Old 06-10-2005, 12:50 AM
RomerB2's Avatar
RomerB2
RomerB2 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bixby, OK
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dschuffert
My experience is that the K&N filters increase potential airflow, which was noticeable to me when changing from a dirty stock filter. My concern is that K&N let too much particulate matter through the filter. It may be within manufacturer specifications, but I personally like to exceed the specifications on something like this. The cost of the filter for the small, if any performance gain, and the poor scrubbing capabilities sent me back to the paper based filters.
The whole thing about the K&N filters for the power, is it releases any restriction being held at that standpoint. The power difference of just the K&N is nominal because the restriction of airflow of a stock filter isn't much. But when you start adding power chips, headers, messing with your cam, and maximizing horsepower gains, then the stock filter isn't enough.
 
  #15  
Old 06-15-2005, 09:04 PM
b4hntn's Avatar
b4hntn
b4hntn is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the drop in K&N in my '94 Bronco 351w. I replaced the stock air intake tube over the radiator with a '94 F-250 460 inlet tube that now forces air through the air box from the grill area. It was $18 at the dealer. Now on highway going up long moderate hills the engine sounds like it has a big 4bbl kicking in and rarely downshifts.
 


Quick Reply: K & N Filters



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.