Questions on 302 compression ratios
#31
I had some others, "Ford Performance" by Pat Ganahl and another I don't recall the title but it was by George Reid. That's the one that has the most mistakes in it, but it's still useful for a reference. I looked up that head milling chart and was wrong. Removing .040 gets the chambers down to 58 ccs on an E7TE head. Should be the same on the GT40. The GTP heads had smaller chambers, they're listed at 58 to 61 ccs.
#32
#33
If I recall there's only .060" of travel in the lifters , So it's possible you may have to shim the rockers after milling that amount (.040) If you're reusing those stock pistons, I'd be hesitant about milling the heads if using a larger than stock cam. Those reliefs aren't too deep there. The P heads are already about where you need them to be as is.
#34
Ok, understood, thank you. I have Explorer GT40's, not the P's. The whole thing is going to an engine shop for machining/assembly/dyno tuning in a couple weeks time, so I'll let you guys know how it all turns out.
Thanks again for all the help.
Rem
Thanks again for all the help.
Rem
#35
Yep. The closest Ford cam to that Chevy grind is the XR256H-10, select the 35-234-3 to get the HO firing order. With headers of some type the software says it'll be just shy at 294hp at 5000rpm but torque output is very healthy at 300+ across the board and a peak of 335lb/ft at 3500rpm. This assumes exactly 9:1 CR, if you can squeak out 9.3:1 that should put it oven the top.
I'll be back in a couple weeks with dyno results.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
playdopyromaniac
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
01-03-2009 09:45 AM
serving_time
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
02-04-2005 02:35 AM