Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

F150 drivers fuel mileage thread 5.0 and ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #91  
Old 05-13-2014, 06:06 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,431
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
You seem to have already made up your mind Tylus. The GM 6.2 is better than the Ford 6.2, but neither will give you the fuel economy the EcoBoost will. It's a pretty consistent theme, those with 3.31s routinely post outstanding fuel economy numbers while those of us with 3.73s routinely post mid-teens on the highway.

Originally Posted by Tylus
I'm following this motor extremely closely because I'm stupidly considering giving Ford more money for a 2015 Expedition.
To be brutally honest, if buying a Yukon prevents you from coming on FTE complaining about paint and fuel economy issues you should do that. Life's too short to drive something you don't like.
 
  #92  
Old 05-13-2014, 11:25 AM
LM14's Avatar
LM14
LM14 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bloomfield, Iowa
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With 4800 miles on the clock, my '13 Eco SCrew is averaging 19MPG for a mixed driving total.

I have gotten 22 on a 400 mile trip that was mostly 55MPH. I live in rolling hills so there is on and off the gas a lot. Do notice a 2MPG drop if it's 70-75 in Interstate or 4 lane. Mostly rural driving with 4 different day long trips into a city driving situation. Even in town I'm getting 15-17 depending on stop lights and traffic.

Very happy so far with the mileage of the Eco, still much better than my 12MPG V10 I traded off!

SPark
 
  #93  
Old 05-13-2014, 11:32 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,070
Received 443 Likes on 325 Posts
I'm planning to put on 1300 km's of highway driving this weekend. I will monitor and post back.
 
  #94  
Old 05-13-2014, 01:09 PM
GuyGene's Avatar
GuyGene
GuyGene is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Clay Country, GA, NE MS
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Look forward to seeing wha' ye get, seventy. Just please put it USA miles per gallon for us southerners.
 
  #95  
Old 05-13-2014, 04:45 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,199
Received 1,230 Likes on 808 Posts
I'm taking my truck on a trip from SE Virginia to mid coast Maine in June. To date the furthest that I've gone is 250 miles each way so the 867 mile trip each way should tell a pretty good story.

I will be sure to report on my trip. Where I grew up in Maine, it's quite hilly but not mountainous and the MPG's suffer immensely no matter what you're driving. It'll be interesting to see how she does in that environment for a few days.
 
  #96  
Old 05-13-2014, 06:17 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4
efx4 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,058
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 5.4L to Freedom
Hey guys, 12 ecoboost super crew , 3.73's,FX4 with 20's and pirelli scorpions. My truck has seen predominantly highway cruising and I've found if you use Shell 93 and set cruise at 80 I average about 20.2 mpg hand calculated consistently between Novi MI and Louisville, Ky... And 20.8 with cruise set at 70 between Novi and Buffalo, NY. I tried both runs on Speedway 87 and mileage fell to about 17.1- 17.5mph.

So I think on the ecoboost side of things fuel makes a big difference
It's funny you mention about Shell 93 octane getting better mpg on your truck over regular grade, as I use the same brand of fuel and have noticed the mpg difference as well.
 
  #97  
Old 05-13-2014, 11:31 PM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250
CuNmUdF250 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
maybe you guys could try a bottle of Outlaw on fill ups ....I`m kidding ....I don't even know if they still make the stuff
 

Last edited by CuNmUdF250; 05-13-2014 at 11:33 PM. Reason: spelling
  #98  
Old 05-20-2014, 07:04 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,070
Received 443 Likes on 325 Posts
Just got home from my weekend travels. for you American friends, I'll put the US figures in brackets behind the metric. Keep in mind, this was 90% highway driving, with no trailer, and just luggage/golf bags for two. Route was as shown in this link: http://goo.gl/maps/lKDvW
Elevations from 2600 feet to 5300 feet. I have the 3.31 axle and Ecoboost engine.

I traveled 1362 km (846 miles) in 15h 53 min, so that's an average speed of 86 km/h (53.4 MPH). I'm kicking myself, but I lost the receipts, so I have to go by the lie-o-meter.
I started out with some city driving for the first day, I was getting readings of 16 L/100km (14.7MPG). By the third day, it was down to 12L/100km (19.6 MPG) , and it stayed there.

For reference, I had pretty good records on my 2005 with the 5.4 engine, and in mixed city/highway driving it got about 24L/100km (9.8 MPG). I never did such a long trip without a load, so it's not a direct comparison.

I'm pretty pleased, especially considering that with the big fuel tank, I'll have a range of over 1000km's on the highway. That's excellent.

I plan to do some towing later in the summer, so I can post up after that.
 
  #99  
Old 05-20-2014, 07:24 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,199
Received 1,230 Likes on 808 Posts
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
Just got home from my weekend travels. for you American friends, I'll put the US figures in brackets behind the metric. Keep in mind, this was 90% highway driving, with no trailer, and just luggage/golf bags for two. Route was as shown in this link: http://goo.gl/maps/lKDvW
Elevations from 2600 feet to 5300 feet. I have the 3.31 axle and Ecoboost engine.

I traveled 1362 km (846 miles) in 15h 53 min, so that's an average speed of 86 km/h (53.4 MPH). I'm kicking myself, but I lost the receipts, so I have to go by the lie-o-meter.
I started out with some city driving for the first day, I was getting readings of 16 L/100km (14.7MPG). By the third day, it was down to 12L/100km (19.6 MPG) , and it stayed there.

For reference, I had pretty good records on my 2005 with the 5.4 engine, and in mixed city/highway driving it got about 24L/100km (9.8 MPG). I never did such a long trip without a load, so it's not a direct comparison.

I'm pretty pleased, especially considering that with the big fuel tank, I'll have a range of over 1000km's on the highway. That's excellent.

I plan to do some towing later in the summer, so I can post up after that.
Considering the elevations, that's incredible for any engine.
 
  #100  
Old 05-20-2014, 07:46 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,070
Received 443 Likes on 325 Posts
This was pretty much a best case scenario, even though we did see some high elevations (that would be kicking horse pass if you are interested), it is mostly gentle grades.
 
  #101  
Old 05-22-2014, 01:31 PM
5.4L to Freedom's Avatar
5.4L to Freedom
5.4L to Freedom is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Spring Lake
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great news, finally had my truck back long enough to do a recent 50/50 city highway economy experiment-- so I can say consistently (with 3.73) I can go 150 miles to 1/4 tank (36 gallon) my best is 164 miles to 9.3 gallons including remote starts. I guess we can add that to the log.
 
  #102  
Old 06-11-2014, 12:20 AM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250
CuNmUdF250 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
been awhile since I posted on this thread (laziness)....last 1,005 miles 17.9 average mpg, mostly commuting to work and back with a few shorter trips here and there
 
  #103  
Old 06-12-2014, 04:20 PM
billybobzia's Avatar
billybobzia
billybobzia is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First trip of summer..

Denver, CO to Durango, CO.. 325 miles or so.. mostly 55-70 mpg, cross wind or head wind most of the way, two big mountain passes, two construction stops idling for 10-15 minutes each.

Computer says 21.9 mpg.. gas guage not quite to half a tank.. not bad..
 
  #104  
Old 06-12-2014, 04:49 PM
Turbo Dog's Avatar
Turbo Dog
Turbo Dog is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Laramie, WY
Posts: 3,013
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
2013 FX4 5.0 3.55 gears and only 15K miles on it with a fresh oil change. Drove about 2 hours at 7000 ft elevation with the truck empty showing 20.3 mpg. Added an empty U-Haul car hauler trailer and drove 1500 miles to NY with an overall average of 15.7 mpg. Loaded a 1967 F100 onto that trailer and drove back. First half of the return trip showed 14.3 mpg, but the land starts to rise up once you get to Iowa and after that it averaged 12.3 mpg.Did all that milage in 3 1/2 days, sleeping in the back and driving driving driving...felt like I was part of the seat by the time I got home.The truck I hauled with and the truck I brought back: 1967 F100 Ranger Camper Special 460/C6, p/s and p/b
 
  #105  
Old 06-12-2014, 11:29 PM
blueovelboy's Avatar
blueovelboy
blueovelboy is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: sunnyvale
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
turbo dog I had a 1970 ranger F250 camper special and it was a great truck. it didn't look near as nice as yours but it was a truck! and I always knew what my MPG was going to be 8.5 empty, loaded, pulling, going up hill, coasting down hill, with a tail wind or a head wind it was always 8.5

 


Quick Reply: F150 drivers fuel mileage thread 5.0 and ecoboost



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.