When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
from my view of thinking a 3.55 rear ratio would give him better mileage from a lower rpm at highway speeds, correct me if i'm wrong that's what i always thought
from my view of thinking a 3.55 rear ratio would give him better mileage from a lower rpm at highway speeds, correct me if i'm wrong that's what i always thought
That's correct. A numerically bigger number means a higher RPM, but the sweet spot for these engines might be right where the 3.73's hit.
The V10's are like that. They get better MPG with a smaller (numerically higher gear) that gets the truck into the sweet spot of the RPM band easier and quicker.
This is just a guess though. The forum experts will have to chime in on your inquiry.
from my view of thinking a 3.55 rear ratio would give him better mileage from a lower rpm at highway speeds, correct me if i'm wrong that's what i always thought
You're correct.
Originally Posted by Stewart_H
That's correct. A numerically bigger number means a higher RPM, but the sweet spot for these engines might be right where the 3.73's hit.
The V10's are like that. They get better MPG with a smaller (numerically higher gear) that gets the truck into the sweet spot of the RPM band easier and quicker.
This is just a guess though. The forum experts will have to chime in on your inquiry.
Stewart
Stewart, unlike the 6.8L, these trucks seem not to have that mystical "sweet spot". They run about the same regardless of the gear, but the gear does affect the mileage. The 3.55 should return slightly better MPG than that 3.73 like I have. But the 3.73 does get up and move...especially with one of Mike's 93 Perf tunes!