Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Air Intake and Exhaust Guides
- Cat Back Exhaust System Reviews
Overview of popular modifications to customize your truck
Browse all: Air Intake and Exhaust Guides
2011+ 6.2 Exhaust
#151
The following users liked this post:
#152
True straight pipes have proven to be horsepower-killers on the modern engines, in my experience. They need the back pressure to run well and get good mileage, in addition to making power. May sound good (depending on your taste), but it would lean the mix out too much and you'd probably lose power.
#153
True straight pipes have proven to be horsepower-killers on the modern engines, in my experience. They need the back pressure to run well and get good mileage, in addition to making power. May sound good (depending on your taste), but it would lean the mix out too much and you'd probably lose power.
I was much younger then so maybe I would have enjoyed it then, but no way I would now.
#154
It isn't so much that back-pressure is needed, but flow velocity. There is a difference. Too large a pipe might have the SAME back-pressure(none) as a smaller pipe, but the smaller pipe will get more power because the exhaust gasses are kept moving fast enough to keep the inertia going to "pull" exhaust from the engine(hope that came out right...). Too big a pipe "stalls" the pulses and actually slows the flow. A properly designed muffled system will out-POWER (not necessarily out-flow on a flow bench...) a straight pipe system with too-big pipes
#155
I removed the secondary muffler on my 6.2It gave it a nice deep sound, not too obnoxious, and I just added short downward dumping tip straight off the primary muffler to keep the exhaust hidden. Sounds good. Havent noticed an increase or decrease in the power or MPG. Best of all..... It cost me $20
#156
It isn't so much that back-pressure is needed, but flow velocity. There is a difference. Too large a pipe might have the SAME back-pressure(none) as a smaller pipe, but the smaller pipe will get more power because the exhaust gasses are kept moving fast enough to keep the inertia going to "pull" exhaust from the engine(hope that came out right...). Too big a pipe "stalls" the pulses and actually slows the flow. A properly designed muffled system will out-POWER (not necessarily out-flow on a flow bench...) a straight pipe system with too-big pipes
Good point on the flow rate versus back pressure. I guess I used the term "back pressure" to mean the flow velocity, which is my mistake. Good catch on the physics of it!
I still need to get a vid of mine during a take off and a fly by. I removed the muffler and left both of the factory resonators, and love the sound. I can fetch 15 mpg on the highway, unloaded, going 75 mph. I got the 3.73 rear. Since I did the muffler mod when the truck was brand new (basically), I have nothing to compare the mpgs to, other than others' reports, but mine seems to be on par.
#157
CCSTP, are you meaning you removed one of the resonators? I am unclear, please explain. I am interested in upgrading my exhaust but have concerns after reading this long thread. My thinking was originally to go with a whole new exhaust from the cat back to the rear, but now I am more inclined to just add a magnaflow muffler, perhaps a 28' one at that.
#158
CCSTP, are you meaning you removed one of the resonators? I am unclear, please explain. I am interested in upgrading my exhaust but have concerns after reading this long thread. My thinking was originally to go with a whole new exhaust from the cat back to the rear, but now I am more inclined to just add a magnaflow muffler, perhaps a 28' one at that.
#159
If you removed the largEST metal can before the tailpipe, it was the actual muffler. Just before that is a small can-like resonator, and ahead of that next to the tranny is a larger, oval, dual-inlet resonator where the headpipes combine their efforts. You must have yanked the muffler....
#160
You could also do like me. I removed the small resonator and replaced it with a Y-pipe cutout. That way I can make the truck factory quiet with a cap on the cutout, or have a sexy exhaust tone with the quick removal of the cap. The best of both worlds and extremely cheap.
The small resonator unbolts out the way, no cutting. It serves no purpose either. If you want to see my mod, just good at my pics in my "garage".
The small resonator unbolts out the way, no cutting. It serves no purpose either. If you want to see my mod, just good at my pics in my "garage".
#161
Interesting. With the cut out below the cab is there any drone while underway? How does the cap come on and off? It just seems to me the factory exhaust system is somewhat redundant and restricting. I love the sound of a magnaflow and will likely just add on a large muffler, keeping the system as is and perhaps adding a ss tip welded on. From looking at the magnaflow web site it appears their exhaust system for the 6.2 totally deletes the resonators, unless I am missing something from their illustrations. The local muffler shop is persuading me to dump them as well.
#162
the setup in the picture is when i had the election cutout valve installed. i haven't had much luck with it not failing, so i just pulled it off. with the turndown pipe, there is no drone at all. With the whole valve and turndown removed, it is slightly louder in the cab during accelerations but the drone is very minimum, if any.
#163
I believe the Magnaflow system keeps the first resonator, as it joins the headpipes into the system, then replaces all behind it.
#164
MagnaFlow Exhaust Products - For Trucks, Suv's, American Muscle, Diesel, & Sport Compact Vehicles
With this system keeping to the 3" tubing, you should not have any drop in mpg, as the exhaust scavenging would remain the same.
#165