Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Modular V8 (4.6L, 5.4L)
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 01:11 PM
HarleyFXDL's Avatar
HarleyFXDL HarleyFXDL is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 141
HarleyFXDL is starting off with a positive reputation.
Horrendous gas milage

I have a 2006 F-350 SB SC 4x4, 5.4, 3.73's and auto. I get about 9-10 mpg's and maybe 11-12 on highway. What pisses me off is I had a 2001 Chevy 2500HD with the 8.1L and 4.10's and I got almost identical mileage. My engine is 50% smaller, much less power, and no significant increase in MPG's. Well I vented and feel a little better.
__________________
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first."
Ronald Regan
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2009, 06:29 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1 LxMan1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 19,988
LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of
Heavier built truck. You are hauling around alot of weight for a small engine.
How many miles on it?
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 05:52 PM
wiscvanman wiscvanman is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: racine wisc
Posts: 48
wiscvanman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarleyFXDL View Post
. My engine is 50% smaller, much less power, and no significant increase in MPG's.
well maybe the 6.0 chev engine might have been the better compromise down from 8l to 5.4.
__________________
05 e 250
4.6 second jasper installed
used for expedited frt devlivery
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 11:31 AM
1ARyan's Avatar
1ARyan 1ARyan is offline
FTE Sponsor
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
1ARyan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sorry to hear about the mileage. At least it gives you an excuse to ride your Harley more often.
__________________

Ryan Scott
1A Auto Parts
Toll Free 888-844-3393
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:52 AM
MDSuperDuty MDSuperDuty is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12
MDSuperDuty is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have 06 250 SC LWB 4x4 and get the same mileage. Again like someone said it is a heavy truck. I had a 05 F-150 with the 5.4 that got 14-15 but the truck weighed a lot less. When I towed it would get maybe 11-12 (can't really remember). My 250 weighs a lot more then the F-150 so the engine is working like the F-150 did with a trailer. Plus I think the SD is less aerodynamic than the F-150 so more drag. My father has a Chevy 6.0L 2500HD SC SWB 4x2 and gets 14-15 highway. Less weight due to no 4x4 = better economy. My only gripe is I would have went with more power with the V-10 and got similar MPG's had I known the 5.4 would get nearly the same mpg. Oh well I'll make a better informed choice next time
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 03:52 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1 LxMan1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 19,988
LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of LxMan1 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiscvanman View Post
well maybe the 6.0 chev engine might have been the better compromise down from 8l to 5.4.
No, the 6.8L V-10 would have been a better compromise

I think the 5.4L loses a lot in the SD due to the loose torque converter around town. We had a 2000 5.4L 2wd at my last job. Ran good, but it stalled a lot higher then my 01 5.4L in my F150 did. This slippage uses more fuel. As a note, my 01 F150 OFFROAD 4x4 with a 5.4L and 3.55 gears got 18mpg on the road 1 time. Usually less. I think it got around 12 or 13 in town.
The SD is a brick in the wind compared to the 97-03 F150 and has a heavier frame and suspension as well.

What gears are in the original truck in question?
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2009, 01:04 AM
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco 78bigbronco is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,376
78bigbronco is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'd normally say if your taking it easy then the size/weight of the truck has more to do with mpg than the engine (thats why often the larger motors are actually same/better mpg). most what I seen the chevy will get a little better mpg and probably alot to do with weight I think. However my dads 2500HD with 6.0 gets as bad or worse mpg as my truck...
But still your milleage is pretty poor if your actually trying to take it easy. That might sound right if you drive it hard, but my V10 in my larger/heavier truck gets better mpg than you are getting. I dont have much city driving on it but combined driving the worse ever I have so far is one tank in the 12's.
__________________

09 F-350 V10 4x4 6spd CC/8' ordered 5/26/09 delivered 7/6/09
99 F-150 4x4 Reg/Short bed
78 Big Bronco 4x4 (a work in progress)
84 Tbird (351W project still in dry dock)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2009, 06:46 PM
maddogken maddogken is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 13
maddogken is starting off with a positive reputation.
i have a 02 short bed, crew cab 4x4 f-250 3:73 gears, just got back from a 250 mile trip and it got 17.8 MPG on the highway.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2009, 02:46 AM
ED Milk ED Milk is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 59
ED Milk is starting off with a positive reputation.
02 F250 supercab 3.73 gears.9 mpg average ,10 if I coast,8 towing a small trailer. 94 F250 5.8 4.10 gears 12.5-13.0 around town.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2004 , 2008 , 2500 , 54 , 9703 , bad , chevy , easiest , engine , f150 , ford , gas , increase , milage , mileage , mpg , poor

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.