1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Does the 3V 5.4 gets better mpg then the 2V 5.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-12-2009, 05:57 PM
jac08f250's Avatar
jac08f250
jac08f250 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melissa TX
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does the 3V 5.4 gets better mpg then the 2V 5.4?

I talk to a guy at the gas station with a I think a 2000 f-250 2wd reg. cab 6 spd, 4.10 gears and he said he is lucky to see 14 mpg on the highway. I have a 2008 f-250 CC 4X4 auto w/ 3.73 and I have seen 18 mpg on the highway driving 60-65 mph.
 
  #2  
Old 09-12-2009, 07:06 PM
BareBones's Avatar
BareBones
BareBones is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnsville, MN
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Comparisons between the 2-valve and 3-valve engines is complicated by the fact that the 2005+ chassis is so much heavier. In theory since the 3rd valve is on the input side and there is supposed to be better fuel/air mixing with the extra intake valve, maybe the 3-valver gets some better mileage. But you generally won't see it on account of all the extra weight.

Then too, what do I know. I thought you could no longer get a 2005+ with a 3.73 because they were all 4.10's now.....
 
  #3  
Old 09-12-2009, 07:14 PM
jac08f250's Avatar
jac08f250
jac08f250 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melissa TX
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wish they all came with 4.10's.
 
  #4  
Old 09-12-2009, 07:39 PM
kelly67's Avatar
kelly67
kelly67 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Remsen,NY
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ditto on the 4:10 I love the snappyness of my friends. over my 3:73 but he also likes my 3v eng and tranny more.
 
  #5  
Old 09-12-2009, 07:49 PM
Thunderduckie's Avatar
Thunderduckie
Thunderduckie is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
18 MPG?? I have a 2003 250, 4x4, four door short bed with the 5.4 and I am LUCKY to see 12 MPG. I just got back from a 1000 mile trip all highyway and got 13 MPG on one tank and the cruise set on 65. Should I be worried?
 
  #6  
Old 09-12-2009, 08:09 PM
1975StroppeBaja's Avatar
1975StroppeBaja
1975StroppeBaja is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I usually get 13-15mpg, for my normal driving area & style. I keep a spreadsheet on this and my lifetime average is 13.99mpg with a record low of 10.3 and a record high of 17.6.

Recently I got 16.5mpg between Asheboro, NC and Myrtle Beach, SC. Then I got 11.5 all week driving around town. Then 16.0mpg on the reverse trip.
 
  #7  
Old 09-12-2009, 08:13 PM
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
QwkTrip is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jac08f250
I talk to a guy at the gas station with a I think a 2000 f-250 2wd reg. cab 6 spd, 4.10 gears and he said he is lucky to see 14 mpg on the highway. I have a 2008 f-250 CC 4X4 auto w/ 3.73 and I have seen 18 mpg on the highway driving 60-65 mph.
I think a lot of the difference in mileage has to do with the speed you drive. Most people will not travel that slow on a freeway with 65+ mph speed limits.

Now, somebody is bound to claim that you can't possibly get that good mileage and/or can't do basic math. I think you can do that well if you really have enough discipline to set cruise and let everybody pass you. At 64 mph I get 22 mpg with my 7.3L diesel. That's 22% better then your 5.4L which is in the correct ball park for what a diesel should do. 18 mpg with a 5.4L seems doable to me.

However, 14 - 16 mpg is probably more typical of what a 5.4L owner will report. My own fuel economy will drop to 19 mpg at 68 mph which again is 20 some percent better. It all seems to add up compared to my own experience.
 
  #8  
Old 09-12-2009, 08:47 PM
redford's Avatar
redford
redford is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stephensville WI
Posts: 23,082
Received 1,565 Likes on 913 Posts
Further complicating the comparison is the transmission, you get an extra gear with the 3V engine.

Steady hiway cruising unloaded I can get up to 18 MPG, but normally I get around 15 MPG per tank.
 
  #9  
Old 09-12-2009, 08:52 PM
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
QwkTrip is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Is there a difference in the final drive ratio in top gear?
 
  #10  
Old 09-13-2009, 07:33 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,156
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
In my mind, you are doing quite well in MPG's. My '88 F-150 is getting about 13-14 combined and 16-17 hwy. Your trucks are much heavier and twice as capable as mine and my mpg's are no better.

For those of us concerned about axle ratio's, I've seen a ton of '09 SD's with the 6.4L on the lots running 3.55's and smaller diameter tires.

Tim
 
  #11  
Old 09-13-2009, 01:05 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by QwkTrip
Is there a difference in the final drive ratio in top gear?
Not really. The 4R100 and 5R110 both have the same last two ratios. (1:1 and .71:1) The variable will be the tire diameter. For instance a stock tire for a 20" rim will be larger in diameter than a stock tire for a 16" or 17" rim. Overall weight, terrain, driving style, fuel type, method or caluculation and etc all play a role in mpg.
 
  #12  
Old 05-21-2014, 05:43 AM
mount zion's Avatar
mount zion
mount zion is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The most ive seen in my 2006 harley davidson f150 is 18.6, but it wasnt easy. Lots and lots of careful hwy driving, with the use of neutral on downhill slopes when necessary. But hey, 18.6 aint bad for AWD/4x4 w/ 22 inch wheels
 
  #13  
Old 05-21-2014, 05:55 AM
CollinsCD's Avatar
CollinsCD
CollinsCD is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Odessa, Delaware
Posts: 13,361
Received 112 Likes on 108 Posts
I haven't had my 2010 F-250 5.4 on many highway trips but I finally broke the 13MPG mark around town. Of course I drive it like an old lady to get that mileage.
 
  #14  
Old 05-21-2014, 06:02 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
I believe it's the much maligned VCT that's responsible for the fuel economy improvement over the 2V engines. I was able to get 20 MPG in my '07 5.4L F150, so 16-17 in a Super Duty seems reasonable to me. Of course driving style is by far the most important thing.

Originally Posted by tseekins
For those of us concerned about axle ratio's, I've seen a ton of '09 SD's with the 6.4L on the lots running 3.55's and smaller diameter tires.
You couldn't get an SRW PSD truck with 3.73s after '08. But you can't compare gear ratios with an engine that makes nearly double the torque as the other. The 6.7L PSD is rated to tow 16,300 lbs with 3.31 gears. The 6.2L V8 needs 4.30s to have the same capacity.
 
  #15  
Old 05-21-2014, 06:41 AM
mount zion's Avatar
mount zion
mount zion is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CollinsCD
I haven't had my 2010 F-250 5.4 on many highway trips but I finally broke the 13MPG mark around town. Of course I drive it like an old lady to get that mileage.
13mpg in town is not half bad for a big ol 250 though
 


Quick Reply: Does the 3V 5.4 gets better mpg then the 2V 5.4?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.