1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

223 6 cylinder ?? 8.5 mpg ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 09-21-2009, 01:11 AM
DeanS63's Avatar
DeanS63
DeanS63 is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by hiball3985
The OD tranny from the 80's can not be used without major modification. Different input shaft length, diameter, bell housing, drive shaft length etc etc..
Really?
I thought the 300 was just a newer version of the 223 (i.e., same engine family).



Dean
 
  #32  
Old 09-21-2009, 04:42 AM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
jowilker is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 24,552
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by DeanS63
Really?
I thought the 300 was just a newer version of the 223 (i.e., same engine family). Dean
NOT, The 223 has the intake on one side and the 300 the other.




John
 
  #33  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:41 AM
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
hiball3985 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: tujunga, calif
Posts: 3,758
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by DeanS63
Really?
I thought the 300 was just a newer version of the 223 (i.e., same engine family).



Dean
300 was a totally different engine. I doubt that there is one part that interchange with a 223.
 
  #34  
Old 09-21-2009, 12:38 PM
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Col Flashman is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: La Verne, California
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DeanS63
Really?
I thought the 300 was just a newer version of the 223 (i.e., same engine family).



Dean
Whoa there, boy-o!
Here's the Skinny & I made a previous statement that should have put paid to that belief if you'd have not just skimmed through it. lol
None of these FoMoCo I-6 Family's of engines are related to each other.

Intro'd in 1952, 215/223/262 I-6 family of mid-size engines w/ Intake & Exhaust manifolds on the Driver-side. Mid-size Cars & Lt. Trucks

Intro'd in 1960, 144/170 Special/200/250 I-6 Family of small block engines w/ Intake & Exhast manifolds on the Passenger-side. Comet/Econoline/Falcon/Maverick/Mustang.

Intro'd in 1965, 240/300 I-6 Family of big block engines w/ Intake & Exhaust on the Passenger-side. Mid-size Cars & Lt. Trucks.
 
  #35  
Old 02-25-2012, 03:31 PM
darray's Avatar
darray
darray is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
223 6 Cylinder

This message is directed to Jowilker....

I have a 1960 F-100 with the 223 and I am looking to upgrade the truck.
I have a 73 F-250 that was built with the 300 and I changed it to the 4.9 injected and like it very much..

In one of your posts in this forum I understood you to recommend a 4.6 and get-er -done. Could you elaborate more on that suggestion or let me know what model year and best car to take a 4.6 from...


I would not mind talking more on this subject, as I am wanting to have dependable service and mileage performance..

Thank You
 
  #36  
Old 02-25-2012, 03:58 PM
darray's Avatar
darray
darray is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good engine for 1960 F-100

Can anyone in this forum advise as to a good modern engine I can install into my 1960 F-100 truck for good economy as well as power...

Thank you
 
  #37  
Old 02-25-2012, 05:54 PM
OldHarley's Avatar
OldHarley
OldHarley is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Newbie, post a new thread so we don't have to read thru one 2 1/2 years old.
 
  #38  
Old 02-25-2012, 08:06 PM
C G B's Avatar
C G B
C G B is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sauk City, WI
Posts: 707
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OldHarley
Newbie, post a new thread so we don't have to read thru one 2 1/2 years old.
Dont mind Greg

But yeah, start a new thread if you have questions about a 4.6/AOD into a slick, please.
 
  #39  
Old 02-26-2012, 09:24 PM
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Col Flashman is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: La Verne, California
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by darray
Can anyone in this forum advise as to a good modern engine I can install into my 1960 F-100 truck for good economy as well as power...

Thank you
The 300 Inline 6.
 
  #40  
Old 02-26-2012, 10:38 PM
darray's Avatar
darray
darray is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the 300/4.9 in my F-250 and it is real strong and does well with mileage considering the weight she hauls..

Thankx for the input

Chuck
 
  #41  
Old 02-27-2012, 09:36 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Col Flashman
Here's the Skinny & I made a previous statement that should have put paid to that belief if you'd have not just skimmed through it. lol
None of these FoMoCo I-6 Family's of engines are related to each other.

Intro'd in 1952, 215/223/262 I-6 family of mid-size engines w/ Intake & Exhaust manifolds on the Driver-side. Mid-size Cars & Lt. Trucks.

Intro'd in 1960, 144/170/200/250 I-6 Family of small block engines w/ Intake & Exhaust manifolds on the Passenger-side. Comet/Econoline/Falcon/Maverick/Mustang and etc, etc, etc.

Intro'd in 1965, 240/300 I-6 Family of big block engines w/ Intake & Exhaust on the Passenger-side. Mid-size Cars & Lt. Trucks.
Flashy, no mid-sized car ever came with a 215, 223 or 240. No Passenger Car ever came w/a 300.

What do you consider a Lt. Truck?

What FoMoCo engine was ever referred to as a mid-size or a small or big block? None.
 
  #42  
Old 02-27-2012, 10:30 AM
arctic y block's Avatar
arctic y block
arctic y block is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Island Southeast Alaska
Posts: 14,325
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Bill I took an I6 out of a 58 sedan and put it into a 57 sedan. This was in the late 60's. I remember it being BIG and was told it was an Edsel I6. What do you think is was? It bolted in where the Y-block came out.
 
  #43  
Old 02-27-2012, 04:34 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by arctic y block
Bill I took an I6 out of a 58 sedan and put it into a 57 sedan. This was in the late 60's. I remember it being BIG and was told it was an Edsel I6. What do you think is was? It bolted in where the Y-block came out.
223 I-6 shared by both 1954/64 Ford and 1958/60 Edsel Passenger Cars. I'd hardly call these mid-sized...unless you compare them the 3 ton + elephantine behemoth 1958/60 Lincoln/Continentals.
 
  #44  
Old 02-28-2012, 11:08 AM
robertr2D's Avatar
robertr2D
robertr2D is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Worden
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vacuum advance

I agree with Jim. Most likely bad vacuum advance or carb. My 223 gets around 20 mpg at 55 mph. Apply vacuum at line where in goes in to top of carb and watch distributor plate. If advance is moving through range of motion then hook line back up and install timing light, When engine revs up the timing should move about 1 1/2 inches on the damper. If not then the carb passage is plugged. Also check to make sure the distributor plate moves freely and that the springs pull the plate back all the way. Rob
 
  #45  
Old 08-26-2012, 04:45 PM
timgort's Avatar
timgort
timgort is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Marquette, Mich.
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gas and fuel questions

Hi Everyone -

This is my second post but I thought it relevant to all of this talk about mileage. I've got a 1960 F100 with the smaller six cylinder (assuming its 223 that you all are referring to).

I just replaced the brake cylinders, changed the oil (to 10w-40 cuz she smoked a bit once she warmed up) and am getting it road-ready.

While I don't know my gas mileage yet, I wondering what kind of fuel I should run. Should I run the higher octane gas from the pump or the regular and with a lead additive?

My transmission has been changed to the four-speed so I have the 'over-drive' but she runs out of juice on hills and I have to down shift. I'm not sure if a tire-change would help or not (as I saw recommended). Don't mind driving her slow and would appreciate any advice.

Tim
 


Quick Reply: 223 6 cylinder ?? 8.5 mpg ??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.