1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

fuel economy - 1999 - 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 09-06-2007, 06:22 PM
dawg 21's Avatar
dawg 21
dawg 21 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just Filled Up The Truck 489 Miles 36.14 Gallions = 13.53 Mpg My Truck Has 166,000 Miles On It It's A 350 Dually With A Utility Bed And Ladder Rack Onlt 1 Ladder Though That Was Mixed City & Hwy. I'm Pretty Happy With That I Don't Drive Like A Girl Thats A Given
 
  #32  
Old 09-06-2007, 07:17 PM
stormyrider's Avatar
stormyrider
stormyrider is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: northern Michigan
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because of the way they make ulsd it has fewer btu's then normal diesel and you should expect to see a loss of around 1 to 1.5 mpg.
 
  #33  
Old 09-06-2007, 08:59 PM
bdrummonds's Avatar
bdrummonds
bdrummonds is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Millbrook Alabama
Posts: 5,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F250_
Danny.... you got me thinking.....

The ULSD is something I haven't thought about in my recent weeks of feeling like I'm going crazy.

You see, I recently changed my oil (changed brand, but stayed with a 5w40 synthetic), and switched over to Stanadyne's Performance Formula where I was using Diesel Kleen. I also found my 6637 a little loose and tightened it back down quite tightly (had only been loose for a couple of days).

Here's the thing... ever since those changes, my mileage has dropped about 1-1.5 mpg for city, mix, and highway driving. I've been going nuts on this. I first thought it was because I of the change from DK to SPF, and am still not sure about that yet (I want to run the SPF at several dosage rates and see if there's a change, and also switch abck to the DK for a double-check as well).

Well, this past weekend, I even pulled and cleaned my EBPV sensor and tubing (and bracket fitting) this weekend, but no change yet. I've upped my Stanadyne slightly... no change yet.

It just might be that my station has finally switched over to the ULSD (I always use the same station and the same pump). I have to ask about this the next time I fill up (tomorrow evening).

Thanks for mentioning the ULSD thing, Danny.
Pete, hate to tell you this, but if you have been buying fuel in AL, it has been ULSD since late December of 06. all the pumps switched over in oct of last year around my area. Ive got a buddy who manages the terminal rack off the Southern Pipeline here in MGM and he told me Alabama was recieving only ULSD through the pipe from december on.
 
  #34  
Old 09-09-2007, 08:05 PM
tlocklear's Avatar
tlocklear
tlocklear is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, that's good to know. I'm running 285 Michelins on my 01 CC PSD 4WD and have never taken tire additional circumference into consideration for mileage. Didn't think it would make that much difference.

Thanks for the heads up.

Originally Posted by JIM ROLAND
Just curious, does everyone take tire size into consideration? My mileage is not nearly as good as some of these reports. My truck is a pure stock 2000, super duty, 7.3, crew cab, 4x4, automatic, except for the fact that I have 285's instead of the stock 265 tires. I went to the Michelin website soon after purchasing the truck and got some information about the difference in the circumference of the two tire sizes. Long story short, it turns out that for every 20 miles traveled on the odometer I need to add 1 mile before calculating the mileage. I usually average about 12 to 13 around town and 21 to 22 on the highway. I towed about 3500 lbs. for 4 hours recently and got only a little over 8 mpg. I do not know what rear end ratio I have. I have gotten as high as 26 mpg in very cold weather on the interstate. Thanks in advance for all responses!
 
  #35  
Old 09-09-2007, 08:41 PM
powerstrokinsmokin's Avatar
powerstrokinsmokin
powerstrokinsmokin is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: altoona wi
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 99 f-350 with auto trans, 4" exhaust, 6 pos chip with k&n intake, stage two injectors, 3.73 gears and i can get about 16.2 mpg empty. pulling 22,000 i get about 11-11.5 going 70 mph. turns like 2050 rpms.
 
  #36  
Old 09-09-2007, 08:56 PM
tlocklear's Avatar
tlocklear
tlocklear is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you say pulling 22,000, that the tow vehicle and trailer, yes? (sorry for the stupid question...newbie, you know)
Originally Posted by powerstrokinsmokin
I have a 99 f-350 with auto trans, 4" exhaust, 6 pos chip with k&n intake, stage two injectors, 3.73 gears and i can get about 16.2 mpg empty. pulling 22,000 i get about 11-11.5 going 70 mph. turns like 2050 rpms.
 
  #37  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:16 PM
powerstrokinsmokin's Avatar
powerstrokinsmokin
powerstrokinsmokin is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: altoona wi
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes truck, trailer and cargo are about 22,000lbs
 
  #38  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:55 AM
F250_'s Avatar
F250_
F250_ is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Looking towards Greenvill
Posts: 11,224
Received 199 Likes on 107 Posts
Thanks for the details, Brandon, but that really doesn't encourage me, especially given the shift in mileage, except I guess it may really mean that I can find some other culprit and regain my losses. The pumps I'm filling up at are all still labelled LSD... don't know why - it's a BP truck stop that has very heavy traffic.

Oh well.
 
  #39  
Old 09-10-2007, 11:09 AM
just another truck's Avatar
just another truck
just another truck is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sterling Heights,Mi
Posts: 10,471
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Dont know how many might have this toy, but you can use your GPS normally to find out how fast you are actually going. then use that for figureing out your GPM. Say you set the Cruise at 70, GPS says you are doing 73. Divide the 70 into 73, you end up with 1.04. Multiply that by you trip odometer, then divide your gallons into that.
 
  #40  
Old 10-22-2008, 03:04 PM
Adelina's Avatar
Adelina
Adelina is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummm.. stupid question.. how do you adjust for the addition tire size? getting average 350 miles to a 25 gallon tank of ULSD and running 285/75R16? could someone give me that formula for this?
 
  #41  
Old 10-22-2008, 03:23 PM
oldgameandfishdiesel's Avatar
oldgameandfishdiesel
oldgameandfishdiesel is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tire size calculator go here and it will give you a percentage difference and multiply your millage by that. 1.037 if your old tire size was 265 75 16. if so your getting 14.518mpg. if they are right didnt check any other sites to confirm.
 
  #42  
Old 10-22-2008, 04:03 PM
bdrummonds's Avatar
bdrummonds
bdrummonds is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Millbrook Alabama
Posts: 5,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adelina
Ummm.. stupid question.. how do you adjust for the addition tire size? getting average 350 miles to a 25 gallon tank of ULSD and running 285/75R16? could someone give me that formula for this?
It really all depends on if your speedo is off or not. FoMOCO allows for a 3 MPH variation. you'll need to check your mph on a flat measured mile (i.e. 2 mile markers with no exits around them on a straight HWY), set cruise at 60MPH and time the distance between the mile markers, (or just use a GPS). 60 seconds to a mile at 60MPH. If it takes you more than 60 seconds then your speedo is reading faster than you are going, if it takes less than 60 seconds then your speedo is reading slower than you are going. Of course this test is to judge whether or not you need to have your PCM recalibrated for a larger tire.
 
  #43  
Old 10-22-2008, 04:33 PM
bkcowboss's Avatar
bkcowboss
bkcowboss is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Herndon KY
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blksiryder
lucas gave me like 3-4 on the hwy, but i still think it was a fulke(?) i have done it a few more times with little gain. but if you can find the good diesel not the ulsd it will yield better mpg also

Ryder
in the independant test result that I saw Lucas actually decreased fuel lubricity.....PM me and I will send you the link to that discussion this weekend
 
  #44  
Old 10-25-2008, 11:47 PM
Neil64's Avatar
Neil64
Neil64 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
285/75/16

I thought I read somewhere on this site that most of our speedos were off when using 265/75/16s but were right on when using 285/75/16s. Anyone remember the thread?

Neil
 
  #45  
Old 10-25-2008, 11:51 PM
empiretc's Avatar
empiretc
empiretc is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,201
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
i do remember that, but only one person was claiming that. trucks and terrains differ greatly.

mine is pretty spot on running the stock size.
 


Quick Reply: fuel economy - 1999 - 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.