Ford, Chevy or Toyota
#151
Originally Posted by Vmax2007
Right, I did not endorse the video or say it was not biased, did I? I simply stated that in your mind, the Toyoyo cannot be inferior in any way.
Where exactly did I state anything about test being fake because the Tundra is inferior?
Originally Posted by Vmax2007
This is based on your defense of every claim made towards any potential inferiority on the Tundra. You are a Toyoyo Fanboy, whether you admit it or not.
Must be the "ME" in you coming out.
#152
[QUOTE=Vmax2007]
In certain areas, yes it does. I brought it up only because I was accused of not being able to form an opinion by looking at a frame's construction, when in reality, I design machine frames and have been doing so for 18 years. No, not automotive frames, but structural frames nonetheless.
Keep up the hard work, maybe someday you'll be promoted to Chief Fry Maker.
lol! hahahaha
Originally Posted by DOHCmarauder
In certain areas, yes it does. I brought it up only because I was accused of not being able to form an opinion by looking at a frame's construction, when in reality, I design machine frames and have been doing so for 18 years. No, not automotive frames, but structural frames nonetheless.
Keep up the hard work, maybe someday you'll be promoted to Chief Fry Maker.
lol! hahahaha
#153
[QUOTE=Vmax2007]
In certain areas, yes it does. I brought it up only because I was accused of not being able to form an opinion by looking at a frame's construction, when in reality, I design machine frames and have been doing so for 18 years. No, not automotive frames, but structural frames nonetheless.
Keep up the hard work, maybe someday you'll be promoted to Chief Fry Maker.
Excuse me, chief fry maker was 2 promotions ago.....should have been able to Google that.
Here's the thang.......before the Getta M echanicComing
fan club arrived, it was mostly US Ford boys discussing how Toy has raised the bar (frame notwithstanding....1 word??)
Kudos to GM for also stepping up......I "personally" like the Toy over GM; it's 100% subjective. I "personally" want Ford to respond to both truck makers.
I'm glad your vast experience allows you to intelligently discuss the Toy's incredibly inept frame.....it makes me ponder how up to just a few short years ago we ever got along without hydroforming and boxed rails...actually GM is only 1 year removed from a boxed frame.....all those poor GM owners!!
Hmmmm.....I think a class action lawsuit may be warranted here!!!
Just like I'd like my Super Duty with Dmax/Allison power, (if I ever switched to diesel) I want my Ford with non-warping brakes, (because it's not just about the towing) I want class leading power available, I want a double OD trans so that my 400HP gets 20MPG, I want to tow my 5,000 pound big block tunnel boat up major grades without breaking a sweat. (measured sometimes by 0-60 times)
Oh, and I want a truck that makes me smile when I get on it at a stop light.
In other words; everything that the Toy has RIGHT NOW!!!
Originally Posted by DOHCmarauder
In certain areas, yes it does. I brought it up only because I was accused of not being able to form an opinion by looking at a frame's construction, when in reality, I design machine frames and have been doing so for 18 years. No, not automotive frames, but structural frames nonetheless.
Keep up the hard work, maybe someday you'll be promoted to Chief Fry Maker.
Here's the thang.......before the Getta M echanicComing
fan club arrived, it was mostly US Ford boys discussing how Toy has raised the bar (frame notwithstanding....1 word??)
Kudos to GM for also stepping up......I "personally" like the Toy over GM; it's 100% subjective. I "personally" want Ford to respond to both truck makers.
I'm glad your vast experience allows you to intelligently discuss the Toy's incredibly inept frame.....it makes me ponder how up to just a few short years ago we ever got along without hydroforming and boxed rails...actually GM is only 1 year removed from a boxed frame.....all those poor GM owners!!
Hmmmm.....I think a class action lawsuit may be warranted here!!!
Just like I'd like my Super Duty with Dmax/Allison power, (if I ever switched to diesel) I want my Ford with non-warping brakes, (because it's not just about the towing) I want class leading power available, I want a double OD trans so that my 400HP gets 20MPG, I want to tow my 5,000 pound big block tunnel boat up major grades without breaking a sweat. (measured sometimes by 0-60 times)
Oh, and I want a truck that makes me smile when I get on it at a stop light.
In other words; everything that the Toy has RIGHT NOW!!!
Last edited by DOHCmarauder; 06-06-2007 at 02:41 PM.
#154
[QUOTE=DOHCmarauder]
Excuse me, chief fry maker was 2 promotions ago.....should have been able to Google that.
Here's the thang.......before the Getta M echanicComing
fan club arrived, it was mostly US Ford boys discussing how Toy has raised the bar (frame notwithstanding....1 word??)
Kudos to GM for also stepping up......I "personally" like the Toy over GM; it's 100% subjective. I "personally" want Ford to respond to both truck makers.
I'm glad your vast experience allows you to intelligently discuss the Toy's incredibly inept frame.....it makes me ponder how up to just a few short years ago we ever got along without hydroforming and boxed rails...actually GM is only 1 year removed from a boxed frame.....all those poor GM owners!!
Hmmmm.....I think a class action lawsuit may be warranted here!!!
Just like I'd like my Super Duty with Dmax/Allison power, (if I ever switched to diesel) I want my Ford with non-warping brakes, (because it's not just about the towing) I want class leading power available, I want a double OD trans so that my 400HP gets 20MPG, I want to tow my 5,000 pound big block tunnel boat up major grades without breaking a sweat. (measured sometimes by 0-60 times)
Oh, and I want a truck that makes me smile when I get on it at a stop light.
In other words; everything that the Toy has RIGHT NOW!!!
Then go buy one, what are you waiting for? My approval?
BTW, the rest of this post was just too stupid to even respond to.
Originally Posted by Vmax2007
Excuse me, chief fry maker was 2 promotions ago.....should have been able to Google that.
Here's the thang.......before the Getta M echanicComing
fan club arrived, it was mostly US Ford boys discussing how Toy has raised the bar (frame notwithstanding....1 word??)
Kudos to GM for also stepping up......I "personally" like the Toy over GM; it's 100% subjective. I "personally" want Ford to respond to both truck makers.
I'm glad your vast experience allows you to intelligently discuss the Toy's incredibly inept frame.....it makes me ponder how up to just a few short years ago we ever got along without hydroforming and boxed rails...actually GM is only 1 year removed from a boxed frame.....all those poor GM owners!!
Hmmmm.....I think a class action lawsuit may be warranted here!!!
Just like I'd like my Super Duty with Dmax/Allison power, (if I ever switched to diesel) I want my Ford with non-warping brakes, (because it's not just about the towing) I want class leading power available, I want a double OD trans so that my 400HP gets 20MPG, I want to tow my 5,000 pound big block tunnel boat up major grades without breaking a sweat. (measured sometimes by 0-60 times)
Oh, and I want a truck that makes me smile when I get on it at a stop light.
In other words; everything that the Toy has RIGHT NOW!!!
BTW, the rest of this post was just too stupid to even respond to.
#156
[QUOTE=Vmax2007]
Then go buy one, what are you waiting for? My approval?
BTW, the rest of this post was just too stupid to even respond to.
Why, because he posted "actual real life experiences" and he didn't have to google anything to prove his point?
I'm sure YugoLovers.com would love to have ya........
Originally Posted by DOHCmarauder
Then go buy one, what are you waiting for? My approval?
BTW, the rest of this post was just too stupid to even respond to.
I'm sure YugoLovers.com would love to have ya........
#157
[QUOTE=SMIGGS]
Why, because he posted "actual real life experiences" and he didn't have to google anything to prove his point?
I'm sure YugoLovers.com would love to have ya........
No, because he asked how we ever got by without FBF's. Same way we got by without 99% of the new technology we have today vs 10-20 years ago. DUH!!! That was a moronic statement.
Originally Posted by Vmax2007
Why, because he posted "actual real life experiences" and he didn't have to google anything to prove his point?
I'm sure YugoLovers.com would love to have ya........
#158
[QUOTE=Vmax2007]
No, because he asked how we ever got by without FBF's. Same way we got by without 99% of the new technology we have today vs 10-20 years ago. DUH!!! That was a moronic statement.
That was a sarcastic statement. ( somewhat funny )
What was wrong with the rest of his post? I guess your stating that the rest of his post, which is his opinion, is stupid?
Those damn Toyoyo Fanboys!
Originally Posted by SMIGGS
No, because he asked how we ever got by without FBF's. Same way we got by without 99% of the new technology we have today vs 10-20 years ago. DUH!!! That was a moronic statement.
What was wrong with the rest of his post? I guess your stating that the rest of his post, which is his opinion, is stupid?
Those damn Toyoyo Fanboys!
#159
[QUOTE=SMIGGS]
That was a sarcastic statement. ( somewhat funny )
What was wrong with the rest of his post? I guess your stating that the rest of his post, which is his opinion, is stupid?
Those damn Toyoyo Fanboys!
You said it, not me.
Originally Posted by Vmax2007
That was a sarcastic statement. ( somewhat funny )
What was wrong with the rest of his post? I guess your stating that the rest of his post, which is his opinion, is stupid?
Those damn Toyoyo Fanboys!
#160
[QUOTE=SMIGGS]
That was a sarcastic statement. ( somewhat funny )
What was wrong with the rest of his post? I guess your stating that the rest of his post, which is his opinion, is stupid?
Those damn Toyoyo Fanboys!
you guys have no idea how hard i'm trying to bite my tongue and not get involved.. but ya'll doing a good job of making me laugh
Originally Posted by Vmax2007
That was a sarcastic statement. ( somewhat funny )
What was wrong with the rest of his post? I guess your stating that the rest of his post, which is his opinion, is stupid?
Those damn Toyoyo Fanboys!
#161
[QUOTE=bigdaddy52107]
you guys have no idea how hard i'm trying to bite my tongue and not get involved.. but ya'll doing a good job of making me laugh
I'm getting a good chuckle out of this also. Happy to hear I'm not the only one being entertained.
Originally Posted by SMIGGS
you guys have no idea how hard i'm trying to bite my tongue and not get involved.. but ya'll doing a good job of making me laugh
#162
VMAX2007, sounds as if a couple others are backed into a corner and can"t seem to
back up any of there claims as you have. Im sure toyota would pay for there own
rebuttles on certain claims, of course only if they could actually prove what Ford/chevy did was not true. Oh and that comercial that has toy truck pullin that
container up (you know the one) well my escort could pull it up if it were'nt for the
light weight of the car. The pulleys do wonder's.
back up any of there claims as you have. Im sure toyota would pay for there own
rebuttles on certain claims, of course only if they could actually prove what Ford/chevy did was not true. Oh and that comercial that has toy truck pullin that
container up (you know the one) well my escort could pull it up if it were'nt for the
light weight of the car. The pulleys do wonder's.
#163
Originally Posted by i1dery
VMAX2007, sounds as if a couple others are backed into a corner and can"t seem to
back up any of there claims as you have. Im sure toyota would pay for there own
rebuttles on certain claims, of course only if they could actually prove what Ford/chevy did was not true. Oh and that comercial that has toy truck pullin that
container up (you know the one) well my escort could pull it up if it were'nt for the
light weight of the car. The pulleys do wonder's.
back up any of there claims as you have. Im sure toyota would pay for there own
rebuttles on certain claims, of course only if they could actually prove what Ford/chevy did was not true. Oh and that comercial that has toy truck pullin that
container up (you know the one) well my escort could pull it up if it were'nt for the
light weight of the car. The pulleys do wonder's.
#164
Originally Posted by i1dery
VMAX2007, sounds as if a couple others are backed into a corner and can"t seem to
back up any of there claims as you have. Im sure toyota would pay for there own
rebuttles on certain claims, of course only if they could actually prove what Ford/chevy did was not true. Oh and that comercial that has toy truck pullin that
container up (you know the one) well my escort could pull it up if it were'nt for the
light weight of the car. The pulleys do wonder's.
back up any of there claims as you have. Im sure toyota would pay for there own
rebuttles on certain claims, of course only if they could actually prove what Ford/chevy did was not true. Oh and that comercial that has toy truck pullin that
container up (you know the one) well my escort could pull it up if it were'nt for the
light weight of the car. The pulleys do wonder's.
What facts would you care for me to back up? I would happily ablige ( sp? ) your request.
#165
Originally Posted by Vmax2007
Yep, they could no longer argue, so they attack me and my credentials instead. Typical reaction I have gotten from several Toyoyo fanboys on quite few different forums. Amazing how similar these people are, makes me wonder if they are the same people sometimes. I enjoy this...is that wrong of me? lol
You are so bringing this onto yourself and yet find a way to tip toe around it.
I find it rather amusing also.