Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-10-2006, 08:45 AM
Ringo Fonebone's Avatar
Ringo Fonebone Ringo Fonebone is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,460
Ringo Fonebone is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Question 400M crank in a 351W?

Is a 400M crank in a 351w the cheap way to build a 393 stroker?
I thought I read this somewhere,that the stock-car guys came up with this originally. Will a M series crank even fit a windsor block?

This is for my driver, stock 351w that needs a new seal/speedi sleeve on the front main bearing. I don't want to spend a lot of money on it, since that has all gone into the other truck I am building. But, if I have to yank the engine and pull the pan off, I could swap out the crank, and maybe even the rods in a jif while it's onthe engine stand.

If this will work..
__________________
1927 Roadster Pickup
1964 Mercury M100 project
1983 F150 Supercab
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2006, 08:41 AM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,749
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
I read an article on this years ago, before the mass of stroker kits hit the market. I don't remember all the details, but it intrigued me at the time. The 400 has the same bore spacing and shares the 351W's 3" mains, so it's fits in pretty well (I don't recall if any machining was required) and I don't recall what rods and pistons were used. I'm sure there's someone here who knows...
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2006, 09:18 AM
alxsnmr alxsnmr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St Louis
Posts: 1,547
alxsnmr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
From what I have seen in the 335 engine board is that the 400 crank will fit but I would bet you have to change the rods and piston so you dont drive the pistons into the heads.
__________________
Stock 1978 F250 Custom regular cab 4x4 with 351M and 4 spd.

1991 Bronco silver anniversary, 5.8L EFI, E4OD swapped for C-6, custom trimmed rear fenders finished in rust.

2009 Fusion SE 2.3L 5spd Red/black cloth n leather
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2006, 09:53 AM
wintremute's Avatar
wintremute wintremute is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Graves County, KY
Posts: 537
wintremute is starting off with a positive reputation.
I remember that article, they used dodge rods and chevy pistons IIRC. They had to regrind one end of the crank to fit in the W block.
__________________
77 F150 Ranger 302 c4 2.79

88 F250 XLT Lariat Supercab 4x4 460 C6 4.10's
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2006, 11:19 AM
Ringo Fonebone's Avatar
Ringo Fonebone Ringo Fonebone is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,460
Ringo Fonebone is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
So I am not nuts.
3 of us have seen the same article


anyone got a link?
__________________
1927 Roadster Pickup
1964 Mercury M100 project
1983 F150 Supercab
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2006, 12:21 PM
wintremute's Avatar
wintremute wintremute is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Graves County, KY
Posts: 537
wintremute is starting off with a positive reputation.
IMO you'd be better off just getting a stroker kit.
__________________
77 F150 Ranger 302 c4 2.79

88 F250 XLT Lariat Supercab 4x4 460 C6 4.10's
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:17 PM
BroncoRoadKill's Avatar
BroncoRoadKill BroncoRoadKill is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,195
BroncoRoadKill is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would think after the machine work and rods and pistons you would be over what a stroker kit goes for. I found a 408 kit for my 351w for about 1200 bucks.
__________________
82 Bronco 351w C6
95 f-150 300I6 5spd 2wd

My truck likes mud.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2006, 09:54 PM
fordfan28 fordfan28 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 72
fordfan28 is starting off with a positive reputation.
re:

I recall an article as well- many years ago, probably Superford, even before the net was popular/available - maybe 1990 or so. If I recall correctly they used the 400 crank with 300-6 truck rods and I can't remember which pistons (custom, maybe?) I think it did require some clearance cutting of the block, but I just can't remember for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2006, 11:12 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,749
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
Yes, the 300-6 rods sounds right, and 1990 or so is about the right time for my memory of reading that article...maybe 1992 or 3. I just can't remember the publication. I have a huge pile of magazines from that time in storage, maybe the next time I get over that way I'll try to dig them out. Don't hold your breath...
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-13-2006, 10:59 PM
baddad457 baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 6,579
baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.
One or the other-- 400M crank or 351W has a shoulder just forward of the #1 main, the other doesn't. That's the only sticking point. Clearancing the block, longer rods and shorter pin height pistons are a must for any stroker project. BroncoRoadKill is also correct about the price. Once you do the machinework and buy pistons and reconditioned rods, you've probably spent what a stroker kit goes for. My 331 short block cost me $1500, including the cam. Block was $50 from a local machine shop (the PO abandoned it there) stroker kit, boring, clearancing was $1225, cam was $115. Throw in the oilpump, main girdle and timing set and it added up to around $1500.
__________________
89 Ranger supercab-- 302-4bbl-- 4 speed 68 Mercury Monterey 390 4 bbl C-6 77 F100 400M C-6 67 Mustang fastback 427 2-4
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-05-2006, 04:32 AM
WarWagon WarWagon is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 319
WarWagon is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am in he process of building a 393 stroker. Yes the 400M crank will work, but that's the expensive way to do it. If you are building a performance motor, then go with the many stroker rotating assemblies out there. You will get a steel crank, H beams and forged pistons. I am just building a stock street motor, So I picked up a crank for $325 and am using my 351 rods and 302 pistons. It works out to about $150 over a stock rebuild. Two suggestions, if you decide to go the same route as I did. One, get a good crank. There are a lot of 3.85 stroke cranks out there for as little as $150, but most are junk. Buy from a reputable crank supplier. I got mine from Speed O Motive and it is good all around. Second, if you are shooting for 9 to 1 compression, as I am, You will have to do some work to open up the chambers to around 72cc. You may also have to do some work on the piston. Most guys that build these strokers, are building an aluminum head motor at about 10.5 to 1 comp, so they don't have to deal with the issues I am facing. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-05-2006, 10:25 AM
daveengelson daveengelson is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 4,248
daveengelson has a good reputation on FTE.daveengelson has a good reputation on FTE.daveengelson has a good reputation on FTE.
Came across article in 'Classic Truck Magazine' not sure of any help but may find informative. http://www.classictrucks.com/tech/02...mall_block_v8/ .

dave
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-09-2006, 11:22 AM
gofast68 gofast68 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16
gofast68 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 400m crank will fit in the windsor block. The snout on the two cranks are different. The 400m crank will have be turned down to look like the windsor crank and then they fit just fine. For all the work and effort in machining a factory crank, you can get an awesome aftermarket crank that simply bolts right in.

Modifying the 400m crank was a good option before the aftermarket pitched in and helped out. Nowadays, it's not real cost effective.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-10-2006, 09:03 PM
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221 MustangGT221 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Topsfield, MA
Posts: 14,944
MustangGT221 has a good reputation on FTE.MustangGT221 has a good reputation on FTE.MustangGT221 has a good reputation on FTE.
I'd say you're better off just getting a 3.85 crank, stock 351 rods, and stock 302 pistons...that is probably the cheapest way to make a 393. If you can get some 302 pistons out of an 88-92 mustang they'd be forged...but since they're a stock piston the valve reliefs are not large enough for a 2.02 valve and they are a 4" bore not overbore...

But you can still get a 302 type piston like I did.
__________________
Justin
95' F-150 XLT 4x4, 393ci stroker, 5 spd, 6" lift/35s
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-10-2006, 11:42 PM
GypsyR GypsyR is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 477
GypsyR is starting off with a positive reputation.
Actually a 400M crank WON'T fit into a 351W block. Not quite. The crank throws are a tad too big and must be machined down. I kicked around the idea of doing this before the new stroker cranks started becoming widely available. I still have the crank laying around. I tried a mock up assembly once and the crank just wouldn't go in. It didn't miss by much, but no dice. Keep in mind that after a machine shop cuts down the throws for you (never minding the other machine work) you REALLY need to have your rotating assmbly balanced. Plus the usual procedure is to also offset grind the rod journals too as the stock 400 crank doesn't really offer that much gain in stroke all by itself. This is optional though. Crank shops don't seem to like offset grinding cranks judging by their price quotes.
Add all this stuff up and those new stroker crank prices start looking pretty good. Hence I still have that old 400M crank that's been collecting garage dust for like seven years now.
A cool idea in its time, but now there are better ways to go.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 11:42 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)

Tags
1991, 351, 351w, 393, 400, 400m, 50, block, building, crank, diy, ford, put, sale, stroker

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup