351m or 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 02-14-2006, 09:54 PM
78fordranger's Avatar
78fordranger
78fordranger is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I knew a guy who had a clevland in his 72 mustang and was really happy with it. I think it is based on opinion and taste of ones motor. Me I like the FEs 390, and the 351C/M and 400 and the 302 wich isnt that bad of a motor either but I like going for cubes in the end
 

Last edited by 78fordranger; 02-14-2006 at 09:58 PM.
  #47  
Old 02-15-2006, 12:44 AM
pud's Avatar
pud
pud is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLKFE
Hmmmm. 400 junk. Cool. 302's are great motors is you have the bajillion $
to spend on them to get the performance on par with a low dollar 400.
if i remeber correctly this was the thread about deciding between the m block or a 302 for a mustang....if so then the 400 is junk for this application. You dont need a bajillion $ to build a 5L, go yank one from a 87 or older mustang and you have 225hp and 300ft/lbs stock...with forged pistons, options are endless. You could take an eaton m90 supercharger off a t-bird supercoupe, buy an intake, pully the hell outta the s/c, carb the engine and have an easy 300hp
 
  #48  
Old 02-15-2006, 12:54 AM
pud's Avatar
pud
pud is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also a good cheap budget junkyard stroker for a 5.L can be had by taking the rods out of a 2.3L (twice) and undersize/offset grinding your cranks rod journals. depending on how much you offset it you can gain up to 15cid making it a 317. The rod journal measurements between the 2 engines are near the same, the 2.3L a hair smaller and a bit longer allowing for the undersize/offset grind, but keeping close the the same rod/stroke ratio except with a little more grunt
 
  #49  
Old 02-15-2006, 12:57 AM
pud's Avatar
pud
pud is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but now that i think about it I vote to go with a windsor, summitracing.com sells cranks that stroke your windsor up to about 370 cid if i remember correctly, they use the stock rods with 5.L pistons, which is great because like i stated before post 87 5Ls came with forged pistons.
 
  #50  
Old 02-15-2006, 10:52 AM
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
rusty70f100 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by pud
also a good cheap budget junkyard stroker for a 5.L can be had by taking the rods out of a 2.3L (twice) and undersize/offset grinding your cranks rod journals. depending on how much you offset it you can gain up to 15cid making it a 317. The rod journal measurements between the 2 engines are near the same, the 2.3L a hair smaller and a bit longer allowing for the undersize/offset grind, but keeping close the the same rod/stroke ratio except with a little more grunt
Just curious, what pistons would you use in that?
 
  #51  
Old 02-15-2006, 11:31 AM
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221
MustangGT221 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Topsfield, MA
Posts: 14,947
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by pud
but now that i think about it I vote to go with a windsor, summitracing.com sells cranks that stroke your windsor up to about 370 cid if i remember correctly, they use the stock rods with 5.L pistons, which is great because like i stated before post 87 5Ls came with forged pistons.
A 3.85 crank in a windsor with stock rods and 302 pistons is a 393ci motor. The windsors can go up to about 427ci.

A 302 is not a windsor. The most I've even seen a 302 go out to is 355, 370 I've never heard of. Most only take it to 347 as it's the most popular. 370 might be for a non-production 302 block. Like a Dart block that has a 4.125 bore and more stroke possibilities (I think they can have different deck heights).
 

Last edited by MustangGT221; 02-15-2006 at 11:33 AM.
  #52  
Old 02-15-2006, 02:14 PM
Torque1st's Avatar
Torque1st
Torque1st is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 30,255
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 26 Posts
For more 302/351W options check with the 302-351W engine forum. There is a ton of information in there.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steve33444
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
12-12-2014 08:33 PM
restoringmy46
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
6
03-19-2009 11:57 AM
restoringmy46
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
16
01-27-2009 05:33 PM
FORD_LOVER
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
14
03-01-2006 02:04 PM
jrfitness
Engine Swaps
11
08-13-2004 07:19 PM



Quick Reply: 351m or 302



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.