Worst GM engine ever made?
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
I've forgotten all about the 350 diesels, those were awful motors.
Originally Posted by JoeBlow
Th 2.8 is a durable motor. Gm sure mad a lot of them for a long time. Couldn't have been so bad.
The Ponitac 265 and 301 were horrible engines. But most engines created in the late 70's early 80's were. But my personal pick for the worst Gm engine has to be the 350 diesel.
The Ponitac 265 and 301 were horrible engines. But most engines created in the late 70's early 80's were. But my personal pick for the worst Gm engine has to be the 350 diesel.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Found it. 2300cc 4cyl aluminum Vega motor (thanks PolarBear)
http://yarchive.net/car/vega.html
High silicone (SAND) content aluminum block with the aluminum removed from the bores. So the pistons are rubbing on silicone which in my experience has a delicate crystaline structure. How would you bore such a thing out to refurbish it? Oh yea, you can't that's why it's junk.
http://yarchive.net/car/vega.html
High silicone (SAND) content aluminum block with the aluminum removed from the bores. So the pistons are rubbing on silicone which in my experience has a delicate crystaline structure. How would you bore such a thing out to refurbish it? Oh yea, you can't that's why it's junk.
Last edited by 76supercab2; 08-18-2005 at 03:33 PM.
#10
#11
I hear alot of good things about the Oldsmobile 307's, weren't they also used on Chevrolet's back in the late 60's/early 70's?
Does anybody remember the Chevrolet 260 (4.3 Liter V8) that was used on the Chevrolet Monza's back in the mid 70's?
Does anybody remember the Chevrolet 260 (4.3 Liter V8) that was used on the Chevrolet Monza's back in the mid 70's?
Originally Posted by JoeBlow
307 was durable though. You could beat on it and it would keep starting up and running.
Last edited by Beast12; 08-18-2005 at 07:14 PM.
#12
Originally Posted by 76supercab2
Found it. 2300cc 4cyl aluminum Vega motor (thanks PolarBear)
http://yarchive.net/car/vega.html
High silicone (SAND) content aluminum block with the aluminum removed from the bores. So the pistons are rubbing on silicone which in my experience has a delicate crystaline structure. How would you bore such a thing out to refurbish it? Oh yea, you can't that's why it's junk.
http://yarchive.net/car/vega.html
High silicone (SAND) content aluminum block with the aluminum removed from the bores. So the pistons are rubbing on silicone which in my experience has a delicate crystaline structure. How would you bore such a thing out to refurbish it? Oh yea, you can't that's why it's junk.
#15
How good is the 'Iron Duke' motors? I hear alot of good comments about the motors, they may not have alot of power but they are pretty indestructible.
Originally Posted by JoeBlow
Th 2.8 is a durable motor. Gm sure mad a lot of them for a long time. Couldn't have been so bad.
The Ponitac 265 and 301 were horrible engines. But most engines created in the late 70's early 80's were. But my personal pick for the worst Gm engine has to be the 350 diesel.
The Ponitac 265 and 301 were horrible engines. But most engines created in the late 70's early 80's were. But my personal pick for the worst Gm engine has to be the 350 diesel.