General Automotive Discussion

Worst GM engine ever made?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-18-2005, 02:34 PM
Dariand1's Avatar
Dariand1
Dariand1 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Worst GM engine ever made?

What was the worst GM engine ever made? I hear alot of bad things about the 2.3 Liter 4 cylinder engine that was used in the Vega/Monza and the 2.8 Liter V6 that used was in the X body cars, the A body cars and the Chevy S-10/GMC S-15 pickups.
 
  #2  
Old 08-18-2005, 02:36 PM
76supercab2's Avatar
76supercab2
76supercab2 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
ALL of them? Had to say it. Wasn't there an aluminum block chevy engine without cylinder liners so the pistons were rubbing the aluminum cylinder walls causing the block to wear out in a short time?
 
  #3  
Old 08-18-2005, 02:38 PM
Dariand1's Avatar
Dariand1
Dariand1 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not that I know of to be honest with you.



Originally Posted by 76supercab2
ALL of them? Had to say it. Wasn't there an aluminum block chevy engine without cylinder liners so the pistons were rubbing the aluminum cylinder walls causing the block to wear out in a short time?
 
  #4  
Old 08-18-2005, 02:59 PM
JoeBlow's Avatar
JoeBlow
JoeBlow is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bayonne NJ
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Th 2.8 is a durable motor. Gm sure mad a lot of them for a long time. Couldn't have been so bad.

The Ponitac 265 and 301 were horrible engines. But most engines created in the late 70's early 80's were. But my personal pick for the worst Gm engine has to be the 350 diesel.
 
  #5  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:03 PM
Dariand1's Avatar
Dariand1
Dariand1 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've forgotten all about the 350 diesels, those were awful motors.

Originally Posted by JoeBlow
Th 2.8 is a durable motor. Gm sure mad a lot of them for a long time. Couldn't have been so bad.

The Ponitac 265 and 301 were horrible engines. But most engines created in the late 70's early 80's were. But my personal pick for the worst Gm engine has to be the 350 diesel.
 
  #6  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:04 PM
polarbear's Avatar
polarbear
polarbear is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Posts: 10,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep- strong tie between the Aluminum 4-banger in the Vega and the 350 diesel. they were both as durable as a potato chip.

BTW- I really liked that 301 in the Pontiac- got great gas mileage, had more power than the 305 chebbie at the time.
 
  #7  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:25 PM
JoeBlow's Avatar
JoeBlow
JoeBlow is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bayonne NJ
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but the 301 was inherently flawed with very thin block castings, there was no room to bore. Lots of oiling problems and face it, the turbo, while a novel concept at the time, was pretty worthless. I forgot about the chevy 267 V8. That was a dog.
 
  #8  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:29 PM
76supercab2's Avatar
76supercab2
76supercab2 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Found it. 2300cc 4cyl aluminum Vega motor (thanks PolarBear)

http://yarchive.net/car/vega.html

High silicone (SAND) content aluminum block with the aluminum removed from the bores. So the pistons are rubbing on silicone which in my experience has a delicate crystaline structure. How would you bore such a thing out to refurbish it? Oh yea, you can't that's why it's junk.
 

Last edited by 76supercab2; 08-18-2005 at 03:33 PM.
  #9  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:38 PM
ARMORER's Avatar
ARMORER
ARMORER is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My friend had a buick station wagon with a 307 v-8 in it. Worthless. Had ZERO power.
 
  #10  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:39 PM
JoeBlow's Avatar
JoeBlow
JoeBlow is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bayonne NJ
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
307 was durable though. You could beat on it and it would keep starting up and running.
 

Last edited by Beast12; 08-18-2005 at 07:13 PM. Reason: inappropriate comment
  #11  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:52 PM
Dariand1's Avatar
Dariand1
Dariand1 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear alot of good things about the Oldsmobile 307's, weren't they also used on Chevrolet's back in the late 60's/early 70's?

Does anybody remember the Chevrolet 260 (4.3 Liter V8) that was used on the Chevrolet Monza's back in the mid 70's?


Originally Posted by JoeBlow
307 was durable though. You could beat on it and it would keep starting up and running.
 

Last edited by Beast12; 08-18-2005 at 07:14 PM.
  #12  
Old 08-18-2005, 04:14 PM
polarbear's Avatar
polarbear
polarbear is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Posts: 10,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 76supercab2
Found it. 2300cc 4cyl aluminum Vega motor (thanks PolarBear)

http://yarchive.net/car/vega.html

High silicone (SAND) content aluminum block with the aluminum removed from the bores. So the pistons are rubbing on silicone which in my experience has a delicate crystaline structure. How would you bore such a thing out to refurbish it? Oh yea, you can't that's why it's junk.
No- it wasn't that. Mercedes used the same process- around the same time- for their 3.5 and 4.5L V8 motors, and I don't think anyone knows the outer life expectancy of those engines. It was GM, i'm afraid.
 
  #13  
Old 08-18-2005, 04:18 PM
bertha66's Avatar
bertha66
bertha66 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 7,946
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
How about the Quad 4 Olds engine.
 
  #14  
Old 08-18-2005, 04:21 PM
JoeBlow's Avatar
JoeBlow
JoeBlow is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bayonne NJ
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what? the quad 4 was a great engine. Lots of power potential.
 
  #15  
Old 08-18-2005, 04:29 PM
Dariand1's Avatar
Dariand1
Dariand1 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How good is the 'Iron Duke' motors? I hear alot of good comments about the motors, they may not have alot of power but they are pretty indestructible.



Originally Posted by JoeBlow
Th 2.8 is a durable motor. Gm sure mad a lot of them for a long time. Couldn't have been so bad.

The Ponitac 265 and 301 were horrible engines. But most engines created in the late 70's early 80's were. But my personal pick for the worst Gm engine has to be the 350 diesel.
 


Quick Reply: Worst GM engine ever made?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.