Ford V10 or Dodge V10
#31
Getting back to the topic at hand. Dodge changes engines like I change my clothes everyday. If Dodge stayed with the V-10 and V-8 gassers instead off going too the hemi. There truck business would be gone by now. Now there going to a 6.1 hemi when the 5.7 hemi came out like 2 years ago if Im right. It will probably go by the wayside in another few years. Dodge deception at its finest. The best thing to do is to avoid Dodges period.
#32
Originally Posted by 150ford
Getting back to the topic at hand. Dodge changes engines like I change my clothes everyday. If Dodge stayed with the V-10 and V-8 gassers instead off going too the hemi. There truck business would be gone by now. Now there going to a 6.1 hemi when the 5.7 hemi came out like 2 years ago if Im right. It will probably go by the wayside in another few years. Dodge deception at its finest. The best thing to do is to avoid Dodges period.
Look back through the 90s. Dodge was sticking with the same engines while Ford was changing, year after year. I don't understand where you are getting this from. It will be a while before the 5.7 is replaced, and the 6.1 isnt even out yet.
Dodge just did a mojor update thats all. They replaced everything they had, except the Cummins.
5.9 went to 5.7 Hemi
5.2 went to 4.7
8.0 dropped completely (soon to be replaced by the 6.1 Hemi)
8.0 Viper V10 went to 8.3
Thats 4 changes in abot 10 years. Where did that post come from ?
#33
And not to mention they changed EVERYTHING about the Cummins in those years, it's not like you get the same one today that you would get back then. Why are they waiting so long to replace the V10? They're just losing sales of people that don't want diesel but know that the Hemi is SEVERELY underpowered in a 3/4 ton truck. (no flames, I also think the 5.4 is not a good fit for a 3/4 ton, neither engine makes enough power, IMO)
#38
#39
Originally Posted by low
There is no replacement for displacement, and the 8.1L, 330 hp@4200, 450 ft-lb@3200 Chevy is hard to beat. And it still makes those great V-8 sounds. The 6.8 would be a better match for the 6.0L.
#42
Originally Posted by bigsnag
Again, the 426 Hemi cars did well, but they did not DOMINATE like Dodge homers would have you believe. Go look it up. Did they get outlawed??? Yes, but so did the 427 Ford's. The Hemi's weren't singled out. It was a displacement limit that was invoked. If you want to see domination, look up the 351 Cleveland. The heads on those were singled out and outlawed from NASCAR because they made too much power and no one else could compete. That is not what happened with the big blocks. They were outlawed as a group because everyone was going too fast.
I usually agree with you...................but the 426 Superbirds had it all over the 427 causing Ford to introduce the SOHC and then the Boss.
Your Cleveland statement confuses the heck outta me. The Yates head CURRENTLY used in NASCAR is a direct relative of the Cleveland. The Cleveland was never outlawed in NASCAR.
In NHRA, however, Cleveland heads were given weight penalties........is that what you're thinking of?
#43
I don't see why everybody thinks that the Hemi, or 5.4 for that matter, is too small for a 3/4 ton pickup. We haul and tow more with our chevys (one with a TBI and one with a Vortec 350) than many of you guys probably do with your diesels. One is a HD 3/4 ton with a flatbed and bale fork, and one is a LD 3/4 ton (6-lug wheels). Of course, with 12,000 pounds behind them, they're workin' pretty hard to pull hills. A little more power would be nice, but it is not really needed. My dad is sceptical about diesels, and doesn't want a gas gussler either (only wish I could talk him into a 496 ).
I just bought an 1st gen Dodge diesel, but I later found that the gooseneck hitch would not work with our horse trailer. When I noticed that it was only clamped to the bed of the box, not attached to the frame, I was glad that it didn't work!!!!!!! Anyway, it will be nice to have that around to do some of the towing.
I just bought an 1st gen Dodge diesel, but I later found that the gooseneck hitch would not work with our horse trailer. When I noticed that it was only clamped to the bed of the box, not attached to the frame, I was glad that it didn't work!!!!!!! Anyway, it will be nice to have that around to do some of the towing.
#44
Originally Posted by MountainHound
The old Dodge V10 was a torque monster. I have the data for it from the 2001 Ram model year. The displacement is 8.0L. That year it was rated for peak 310hp @ 4000rpm and 450lb-ft @ 2200rpm!!
Consider this-the 2003 Ford V10 is taed to make about 375lb-ft at 1500 rpm. The old Dodge V10 for that year was rated for 430lb-ft at 1500rpm!! The whole torque curve is super flat-it makes over 400lb-ft from 800rpm to 5000rpm!!!!! .
Consider this-the 2003 Ford V10 is taed to make about 375lb-ft at 1500 rpm. The old Dodge V10 for that year was rated for 430lb-ft at 1500rpm!! The whole torque curve is super flat-it makes over 400lb-ft from 800rpm to 5000rpm!!!!! .
Somone said somthing about leaning away from deasels. In reality what you are probibly going to be seeing in the next decade is hybrid deasels. I would predict a hybrid of this type to produce probibly 500hp @ 2500rpm and 600ft-lbs @ 2000rpm consuming about 30mpg. Currently dodge puts out the best deasel on the market. I not sure but if i recall it's somthing like 575 horse and 610 ft-lbs. i know it gets around 18 mpg.