302 vs 4.6
#1
01-20-2004, 12:01 PM
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
01-20-2004, 03:25 PM
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure if the 4.6 has changed much since 97, but here's my 2 cents:
I had an 88 XLT SCAB 4x4 with manual transmission. The 302 did ok, but struggled when I was towing my bassboat uphill...a lot of 3rd gear driving. My 97 XLT SCAB 2WD has auto trans and does a better job at towing at highway speeds. It also seems to do better around town. I love that engine.
With the higher weight on the 2004 F150, I'd be a little bit skeptical about the 4.6. I have a 2004 FX4 SCAB on order, and I'm glad it has the 5.4.
I had an 88 XLT SCAB 4x4 with manual transmission. The 302 did ok, but struggled when I was towing my bassboat uphill...a lot of 3rd gear driving. My 97 XLT SCAB 2WD has auto trans and does a better job at towing at highway speeds. It also seems to do better around town. I love that engine.
With the higher weight on the 2004 F150, I'd be a little bit skeptical about the 4.6. I have a 2004 FX4 SCAB on order, and I'm glad it has the 5.4.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redone
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
19
02-06-2020 10:11 AM
Pastmaster
Modular V8 (4.6L, 5.4L)
21
02-17-2016 05:56 PM