2019 - 2023 Ranger Everything about the new 2019-2023 Ford Ranger.

It's coming BACK!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-18-2017, 07:52 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,432
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
It's coming BACK!!!

New Ford Ranger - Ford Ranger Compact Pickup Returns for 2020

Now that it's officially announced, we'll all see lots of speculation on what we're going to get in two years. The Ranger has remained in production in other parts of the world and has gotten routine updates. Thinking it'll be another evolution of the global design that we never got.

Here's the version currently sold in the UK:



Ford Ranger 2016 - Robust Pick-Up Truck | Ford UK
 
  #2  
Old 01-18-2017, 01:25 PM
Strokin-A-2010's Avatar
Strokin-A-2010
Strokin-A-2010 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
With fuel prices probably going up very soon this will probably be a big hit when it comes out. Probably will have a small diesel engine to compete with Gm's mid size diesel truck.
 
  #3  
Old 01-19-2017, 01:36 PM
scottscott's Avatar
scottscott
scottscott is online now
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wildwood Pa
Posts: 1,284
Received 196 Likes on 136 Posts
The best part of all is that they will be made in the USA for this market.

Following the 2016 link.... Then models...... The ones shown in white from the side are darn ugly. Maybe with some upscale trim & better colors they will be more appealing.
 
  #4  
Old 01-19-2017, 04:05 PM
2.7EcoBoost's Avatar
2.7EcoBoost
2.7EcoBoost is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 183
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Make the 2.7 EcoBoost available and it will embarrass every other midsize from a performance perspective. 7,700+ lbs and 30+ inches of water Fording....in the UK model.
 
  #5  
Old 01-19-2017, 04:06 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,432
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by 2.7EcoBoost
Make the 2.7 EcoBoost available and it will embarrass every other midsize from a performance perspective.
No kidding! The F150 is a rocketship with the 2.7L, imagine a truck 1,000 lbs lighter...
 
  #6  
Old 01-19-2017, 04:58 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,236
Received 1,233 Likes on 809 Posts
My daughter intends to get one when she returns from the her deployment next year. I'll be with her every step of the way.
 
  #7  
Old 01-20-2017, 08:02 AM
Christian's1988Ford's Avatar
Christian's1988Ford
Christian's1988Ford is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
I'm looking forward to seeing how this one turns out.

Other than needing a facelift and some beefier trim options, I think it will fit right in with the competition. I wonder how fast it will become the best-selling small chassis truck in America, alongside the F150?
 
  #8  
Old 01-20-2017, 09:31 AM
nova801428's Avatar
nova801428
nova801428 is online now
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: OR
Posts: 183
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I just hope it's actually a midsized truck and not a 7/8 size Tacoma. I'd rather not see the 2.7 ecocrap. I want to see the 5.0!
 
  #9  
Old 01-20-2017, 09:34 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,432
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by nova801428
I'd rather not see the 2.7 ecocrap. I want to see the 5.0!
Ha ha...you've obviously never driven one.
 
  #10  
Old 01-20-2017, 09:52 AM
Christian's1988Ford's Avatar
Christian's1988Ford
Christian's1988Ford is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
Ha ha...you've obviously never driven one.
It's funny how some people base their idea of what an engine is like based solely on displacement. I've ridden in a 3.5 F150 myself, it's not exactly a slouch, and the 2.7 is actually incrementally faster!!!

I would guess that some of the new smaller engines the 2018 F150 will have will be found in the Ranger. A big deal-breaker for the average person to buy a smaller truck would be much better gas mileage; the 5.0 isn't a big seller, even in a full-sized truck.
 
  #11  
Old 01-20-2017, 10:03 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,236
Received 1,233 Likes on 809 Posts
That new 3.3L seems like it'll be a hoss for sure and it'll likely find it's way into the Ranger stable. That could be a good reason why we're seeing this engine new for 2018.

The 2.7L EB would be a fricken scream!!!!!!!
 
  #12  
Old 01-20-2017, 11:39 AM
FORD COASTIE's Avatar
FORD COASTIE
FORD COASTIE is offline
Supporter of Patriotism
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 9,587
Received 2,375 Likes on 1,719 Posts
I'm excited about this new Ranger and look forward to seeing what Ford does with it.

I think the 2.7 Ecoboost would be awesome in this truck.
 
  #13  
Old 01-20-2017, 03:52 PM
got2bjoester's Avatar
got2bjoester
got2bjoester is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 516
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I would like to see a Shelby version.
Jump into the market with a screamer nobody expected.

If I hit the lottery.........
 
  #14  
Old 01-20-2017, 07:31 PM
nova801428's Avatar
nova801428
nova801428 is online now
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: OR
Posts: 183
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
Ha ha...you've obviously never driven one.
I sure have. And, while sure you can make power with a twin turbo anything there is still a saying I live by...There is no replacement for displacement. Let's slap a turbo on a 5.0 and compare some numbers


Originally Posted by Christian's1988Ford
It's funny how some people base their idea of what an engine is like based solely on displacement. I've ridden in a 3.5 F150 myself, it's not exactly a slouch, and the 2.7 is actually incrementally faster!!!
I was thinking about ordering an F150 but decided I like no payments instead. In the process I test drove a 2.7 ecoboost and It had more power than anything I've ever driven except motorcycles. It is impressive what a turbo can do. I just would prefer a 5.0. Not that I think turbos are unreliable or anything.
 
  #15  
Old 01-20-2017, 07:40 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,432
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by nova801428
I sure have. And, while sure you can make power with a twin turbo anything there is still a saying I live by...There is no replacement for displacement. Let's slap a turbo on a 5.0 and compare some numbers
1995 called, and they want their engine back.

Nothing against the 5.0L engine, but it's pretty unlikely that you'll see it in a compact pickup. The little 2.7L engine makes more power than the 5.4L V8 ever did, without the penalties of aftermarket forced induction. That means it survives forced induction day in and day out, even pulling heavy things up hills. You can't get that with aftermarket conversions.

I like the Coyote 5.0L, I had one in my Mustang and it was a rocketship. That doesn't make the turbocharged V6es "ecocrap".
 


Quick Reply: It's coming BACK!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.